Better watch out for those crazy veterans, way OT

[Veritas]

scaredycat,
How convenient to cloak your cowardice in patriotism. I am certain you would not have been successful in the military. You probably are not very athletic and you certainly have no heart. Perhaps you would not have passed any psychological tests given either. Sergeant York was a conscientious objector because of his religious beliefs and yet he served with great honor. You are nothing but a coward. I am sure Russ will come to your defense because of his weltanschauung. Allan is under attack because he does not fit the left’s definition of the military because of his literacy (an intelligent warrior). Navy Doc does not count either to them because he is a physician. I salute both of you. The military in the United States continues to be a stalwart institution over the generations despite the constant barrage from the left. May it always be so.

“War will exist until the distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige as the warrior does today.”
– John F. Kennedy (1917-1963), the thirty-fifth President of the United States, letter to a Navy friend

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Rus: You and Scaredy both lack the ability to understand facts or compose a coherent argument. My point, Russell, is that you were engaging in the same Attack, Get Walloped, and cry Foul nonsense as you’ve done with me in the past. I was illustrating a recurring pattern of behavior on your part.

When the discourse between you, sdr and SDR started going south, you immediately resorted to name calling and invective, ending with your trademark, “Gee, can’t we all get along” sign-off, which is nothing other than a thinly veiled attempt to retreat while dropping smoke behind you.

It is perfectly acceptable to you to profess hate and pillory others who don’t share your views, but you lack even the basic understanding of someone else’s point of view if it doesn’t conform to your own. You, Scaredy and TheBreeze are too thin skinned to accept criticism or an opposing view, which is why you fall back on name calling and blame shifting, you lack the ability to counter opposing arguments with fact and fall back on your own “indoctrinated” views.

That’s the kind of “enlightenment” that gave us the Inquistion, witch burnings and concentration camps.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Rus: You and Scaredy both lack the ability to understand facts or compose a coherent argument. My point, Russell, is that you were engaging in the same Attack, Get Walloped, and cry Foul nonsense as you’ve done with me in the past. I was illustrating a recurring pattern of behavior on your part.

When the discourse between you, sdr and SDR started going south, you immediately resorted to name calling and invective, ending with your trademark, “Gee, can’t we all get along” sign-off, which is nothing other than a thinly veiled attempt to retreat while dropping smoke behind you.

It is perfectly acceptable to you to profess hate and pillory others who don’t share your views, but you lack even the basic understanding of someone else’s point of view if it doesn’t conform to your own. You, Scaredy and TheBreeze are too thin skinned to accept criticism or an opposing view, which is why you fall back on name calling and blame shifting, you lack the ability to counter opposing arguments with fact and fall back on your own “indoctrinated” views.

That’s the kind of “enlightenment” that gave us the Inquistion, witch burnings and concentration camps.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Rus: You and Scaredy both lack the ability to understand facts or compose a coherent argument. My point, Russell, is that you were engaging in the same Attack, Get Walloped, and cry Foul nonsense as you’ve done with me in the past. I was illustrating a recurring pattern of behavior on your part.

When the discourse between you, sdr and SDR started going south, you immediately resorted to name calling and invective, ending with your trademark, “Gee, can’t we all get along” sign-off, which is nothing other than a thinly veiled attempt to retreat while dropping smoke behind you.

It is perfectly acceptable to you to profess hate and pillory others who don’t share your views, but you lack even the basic understanding of someone else’s point of view if it doesn’t conform to your own. You, Scaredy and TheBreeze are too thin skinned to accept criticism or an opposing view, which is why you fall back on name calling and blame shifting, you lack the ability to counter opposing arguments with fact and fall back on your own “indoctrinated” views.

That’s the kind of “enlightenment” that gave us the Inquistion, witch burnings and concentration camps.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Rus: You and Scaredy both lack the ability to understand facts or compose a coherent argument. My point, Russell, is that you were engaging in the same Attack, Get Walloped, and cry Foul nonsense as you’ve done with me in the past. I was illustrating a recurring pattern of behavior on your part.

When the discourse between you, sdr and SDR started going south, you immediately resorted to name calling and invective, ending with your trademark, “Gee, can’t we all get along” sign-off, which is nothing other than a thinly veiled attempt to retreat while dropping smoke behind you.

It is perfectly acceptable to you to profess hate and pillory others who don’t share your views, but you lack even the basic understanding of someone else’s point of view if it doesn’t conform to your own. You, Scaredy and TheBreeze are too thin skinned to accept criticism or an opposing view, which is why you fall back on name calling and blame shifting, you lack the ability to counter opposing arguments with fact and fall back on your own “indoctrinated” views.

That’s the kind of “enlightenment” that gave us the Inquistion, witch burnings and concentration camps.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Rus: You and Scaredy both lack the ability to understand facts or compose a coherent argument. My point, Russell, is that you were engaging in the same Attack, Get Walloped, and cry Foul nonsense as you’ve done with me in the past. I was illustrating a recurring pattern of behavior on your part.

When the discourse between you, sdr and SDR started going south, you immediately resorted to name calling and invective, ending with your trademark, “Gee, can’t we all get along” sign-off, which is nothing other than a thinly veiled attempt to retreat while dropping smoke behind you.

It is perfectly acceptable to you to profess hate and pillory others who don’t share your views, but you lack even the basic understanding of someone else’s point of view if it doesn’t conform to your own. You, Scaredy and TheBreeze are too thin skinned to accept criticism or an opposing view, which is why you fall back on name calling and blame shifting, you lack the ability to counter opposing arguments with fact and fall back on your own “indoctrinated” views.

That’s the kind of “enlightenment” that gave us the Inquistion, witch burnings and concentration camps.

[afx114]

[quote=Veritas]Allan is under attack because he does not fit the left’s definition of the military because of his literacy (an intelligent warrior).[/quote]

I am a lefty and I wish that we had more intelligent warriors. Might by itself is dangerous, but might combined with wisdom is desirable. It is not the might that makes the warrior great — it is the wisdom of when and when not to use it.

[afx114]

[quote=Veritas]Allan is under attack because he does not fit the left’s definition of the military because of his literacy (an intelligent warrior).[/quote]

I am a lefty and I wish that we had more intelligent warriors. Might by itself is dangerous, but might combined with wisdom is desirable. It is not the might that makes the warrior great — it is the wisdom of when and when not to use it.

[afx114]

[quote=Veritas]Allan is under attack because he does not fit the left’s definition of the military because of his literacy (an intelligent warrior).[/quote]

I am a lefty and I wish that we had more intelligent warriors. Might by itself is dangerous, but might combined with wisdom is desirable. It is not the might that makes the warrior great — it is the wisdom of when and when not to use it.

[afx114]

[quote=Veritas]Allan is under attack because he does not fit the left’s definition of the military because of his literacy (an intelligent warrior).[/quote]

I am a lefty and I wish that we had more intelligent warriors. Might by itself is dangerous, but might combined with wisdom is desirable. It is not the might that makes the warrior great — it is the wisdom of when and when not to use it.

[afx114]

[quote=Veritas]Allan is under attack because he does not fit the left’s definition of the military because of his literacy (an intelligent warrior).[/quote]

I am a lefty and I wish that we had more intelligent warriors. Might by itself is dangerous, but might combined with wisdom is desirable. It is not the might that makes the warrior great — it is the wisdom of when and when not to use it.

[Veritas]

Then perhaps you should talk to more veterans and lose some more of your stereotypes. One of my best friends is an extreme left, anti-war, socialist. We remain friends because I look beyond the politics. We also avoid most political discussions because never the twain shall meet. Allan’s service is praise worthy.

[Veritas]

Then perhaps you should talk to more veterans and lose some more of your stereotypes. One of my best friends is an extreme left, anti-war, socialist. We remain friends because I look beyond the politics. We also avoid most political discussions because never the twain shall meet. Allan’s service is praise worthy.

[Veritas]

Then perhaps you should talk to more veterans and lose some more of your stereotypes. One of my best friends is an extreme left, anti-war, socialist. We remain friends because I look beyond the politics. We also avoid most political discussions because never the twain shall meet. Allan’s service is praise worthy.

[Veritas]

Then perhaps you should talk to more veterans and lose some more of your stereotypes. One of my best friends is an extreme left, anti-war, socialist. We remain friends because I look beyond the politics. We also avoid most political discussions because never the twain shall meet. Allan’s service is praise worthy.

[Author]

Posts