- This topic has 565 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by
urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 25, 2008 at 12:02 AM #159744February 25, 2008 at 7:08 AM #159377
Bugs
ParticipantIf I remember correctly, the borrower in question is employed in the financial services business. I can see why negative opinions about his financial acumen and his ethical conduct might cut into his employment.
February 25, 2008 at 7:08 AM #159675ParticipantIf I remember correctly, the borrower in question is employed in the financial services business. I can see why negative opinions about his financial acumen and his ethical conduct might cut into his employment.
February 25, 2008 at 7:08 AM #159689ParticipantIf I remember correctly, the borrower in question is employed in the financial services business. I can see why negative opinions about his financial acumen and his ethical conduct might cut into his employment.
February 25, 2008 at 7:08 AM #159693ParticipantIf I remember correctly, the borrower in question is employed in the financial services business. I can see why negative opinions about his financial acumen and his ethical conduct might cut into his employment.
February 25, 2008 at 7:08 AM #159768ParticipantIf I remember correctly, the borrower in question is employed in the financial services business. I can see why negative opinions about his financial acumen and his ethical conduct might cut into his employment.
February 25, 2008 at 7:35 AM #159382bsrsharma
ParticipantConnecting address and tax records gave a name
It is not clear to me if OCRenter published the name or a reader could infer it from his own research. If OCR didn't publish the name, I think he is on pretty strong ground. If he did, that was probably not a good idea. His story would be equally interesting if he just said "Joe Smith " (or even F*D Borrower!) without revealing buyer's identity.
February 25, 2008 at 7:35 AM #159680ParticipantConnecting address and tax records gave a name
It is not clear to me if OCRenter published the name or a reader could infer it from his own research. If OCR didn't publish the name, I think he is on pretty strong ground. If he did, that was probably not a good idea. His story would be equally interesting if he just said "Joe Smith " (or even F*D Borrower!) without revealing buyer's identity.
February 25, 2008 at 7:35 AM #159694ParticipantConnecting address and tax records gave a name
It is not clear to me if OCRenter published the name or a reader could infer it from his own research. If OCR didn't publish the name, I think he is on pretty strong ground. If he did, that was probably not a good idea. His story would be equally interesting if he just said "Joe Smith " (or even F*D Borrower!) without revealing buyer's identity.
February 25, 2008 at 7:35 AM #159698ParticipantConnecting address and tax records gave a name
It is not clear to me if OCRenter published the name or a reader could infer it from his own research. If OCR didn't publish the name, I think he is on pretty strong ground. If he did, that was probably not a good idea. His story would be equally interesting if he just said "Joe Smith " (or even F*D Borrower!) without revealing buyer's identity.
February 25, 2008 at 7:35 AM #159773ParticipantConnecting address and tax records gave a name
It is not clear to me if OCRenter published the name or a reader could infer it from his own research. If OCR didn't publish the name, I think he is on pretty strong ground. If he did, that was probably not a good idea. His story would be equally interesting if he just said "Joe Smith " (or even F*D Borrower!) without revealing buyer's identity.
February 25, 2008 at 7:42 AM #159387JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Pretty sure he mentioned the name. I agree, it probably would have been wiser to not name the person, but I don’t what the legal ramifications are as a result if any.
February 25, 2008 at 7:42 AM #159685ParticipantJWM in SD
Pretty sure he mentioned the name. I agree, it probably would have been wiser to not name the person, but I don’t what the legal ramifications are as a result if any.
February 25, 2008 at 7:42 AM #159699ParticipantJWM in SD
Pretty sure he mentioned the name. I agree, it probably would have been wiser to not name the person, but I don’t what the legal ramifications are as a result if any.
February 25, 2008 at 7:42 AM #159703ParticipantJWM in SD
Pretty sure he mentioned the name. I agree, it probably would have been wiser to not name the person, but I don’t what the legal ramifications are as a result if any.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.