- This topic has 340 replies, 29 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 11 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 25, 2008 at 3:26 PM #160110February 25, 2008 at 10:20 PM #159937
patientrenter
ParticipantIf you can get Rex and Co to pay you $200K for some future gains on your property, go for it. It may be a good deal for you.
The people behind Rex and Co may be very smart, just as Mr Mozilo was. I doubt that $200K they’re promising you is coming from them. Are the investors putting up that $200K very smart? Haha! Were the investors putting up $2 trillion in the last few years to lend against buying homes all over California and Florida and Nevada smart? Just because you can get someone to pay you $200k for future home appreciation doesn’t mean it’s worth that much. It may just mean there are a few dumb investors left, falling for the next bait.
Patient renter in OC
February 25, 2008 at 10:20 PM #160233patientrenter
ParticipantIf you can get Rex and Co to pay you $200K for some future gains on your property, go for it. It may be a good deal for you.
The people behind Rex and Co may be very smart, just as Mr Mozilo was. I doubt that $200K they’re promising you is coming from them. Are the investors putting up that $200K very smart? Haha! Were the investors putting up $2 trillion in the last few years to lend against buying homes all over California and Florida and Nevada smart? Just because you can get someone to pay you $200k for future home appreciation doesn’t mean it’s worth that much. It may just mean there are a few dumb investors left, falling for the next bait.
Patient renter in OC
February 25, 2008 at 10:20 PM #160249patientrenter
ParticipantIf you can get Rex and Co to pay you $200K for some future gains on your property, go for it. It may be a good deal for you.
The people behind Rex and Co may be very smart, just as Mr Mozilo was. I doubt that $200K they’re promising you is coming from them. Are the investors putting up that $200K very smart? Haha! Were the investors putting up $2 trillion in the last few years to lend against buying homes all over California and Florida and Nevada smart? Just because you can get someone to pay you $200k for future home appreciation doesn’t mean it’s worth that much. It may just mean there are a few dumb investors left, falling for the next bait.
Patient renter in OC
February 25, 2008 at 10:20 PM #160252patientrenter
ParticipantIf you can get Rex and Co to pay you $200K for some future gains on your property, go for it. It may be a good deal for you.
The people behind Rex and Co may be very smart, just as Mr Mozilo was. I doubt that $200K they’re promising you is coming from them. Are the investors putting up that $200K very smart? Haha! Were the investors putting up $2 trillion in the last few years to lend against buying homes all over California and Florida and Nevada smart? Just because you can get someone to pay you $200k for future home appreciation doesn’t mean it’s worth that much. It may just mean there are a few dumb investors left, falling for the next bait.
Patient renter in OC
February 25, 2008 at 10:20 PM #160330patientrenter
ParticipantIf you can get Rex and Co to pay you $200K for some future gains on your property, go for it. It may be a good deal for you.
The people behind Rex and Co may be very smart, just as Mr Mozilo was. I doubt that $200K they’re promising you is coming from them. Are the investors putting up that $200K very smart? Haha! Were the investors putting up $2 trillion in the last few years to lend against buying homes all over California and Florida and Nevada smart? Just because you can get someone to pay you $200k for future home appreciation doesn’t mean it’s worth that much. It may just mean there are a few dumb investors left, falling for the next bait.
Patient renter in OC
February 26, 2008 at 7:23 AM #160061dontfollowtheherd
Participantkewp,
I think you’re right on as far as this going on for a while. It’s been running in cycles for 100 years or so – as long as the government started keeping records it’s been averaging nine year cycles. Supply and demand along with market psychology play a large part in it. Getting the financing won’t be that easy after the billions lost this time around. Anyone betting on a much shorter time line might want to invest in a pair of these Kevlar babies:
[img_assist|nid=6659|title=Knife Catchers|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=356]
dfth
February 26, 2008 at 7:23 AM #160358dontfollowtheherd
Participantkewp,
I think you’re right on as far as this going on for a while. It’s been running in cycles for 100 years or so – as long as the government started keeping records it’s been averaging nine year cycles. Supply and demand along with market psychology play a large part in it. Getting the financing won’t be that easy after the billions lost this time around. Anyone betting on a much shorter time line might want to invest in a pair of these Kevlar babies:
[img_assist|nid=6659|title=Knife Catchers|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=356]
dfth
February 26, 2008 at 7:23 AM #160374dontfollowtheherd
Participantkewp,
I think you’re right on as far as this going on for a while. It’s been running in cycles for 100 years or so – as long as the government started keeping records it’s been averaging nine year cycles. Supply and demand along with market psychology play a large part in it. Getting the financing won’t be that easy after the billions lost this time around. Anyone betting on a much shorter time line might want to invest in a pair of these Kevlar babies:
[img_assist|nid=6659|title=Knife Catchers|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=356]
dfth
February 26, 2008 at 7:23 AM #160377dontfollowtheherd
Participantkewp,
I think you’re right on as far as this going on for a while. It’s been running in cycles for 100 years or so – as long as the government started keeping records it’s been averaging nine year cycles. Supply and demand along with market psychology play a large part in it. Getting the financing won’t be that easy after the billions lost this time around. Anyone betting on a much shorter time line might want to invest in a pair of these Kevlar babies:
[img_assist|nid=6659|title=Knife Catchers|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=356]
dfth
February 26, 2008 at 7:23 AM #160455dontfollowtheherd
Participantkewp,
I think you’re right on as far as this going on for a while. It’s been running in cycles for 100 years or so – as long as the government started keeping records it’s been averaging nine year cycles. Supply and demand along with market psychology play a large part in it. Getting the financing won’t be that easy after the billions lost this time around. Anyone betting on a much shorter time line might want to invest in a pair of these Kevlar babies:
[img_assist|nid=6659|title=Knife Catchers|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=356]
dfth
February 26, 2008 at 7:46 AM #1600814plexowner
Participantdontfollowtheherd – do you recommend the ‘slap the knife blade between two palms’ technique or do you prefer the ‘stop the knife point with your palm and grab the blade with your free hand’ method?
February 26, 2008 at 7:46 AM #1603784plexowner
Participantdontfollowtheherd – do you recommend the ‘slap the knife blade between two palms’ technique or do you prefer the ‘stop the knife point with your palm and grab the blade with your free hand’ method?
February 26, 2008 at 7:46 AM #1603944plexowner
Participantdontfollowtheherd – do you recommend the ‘slap the knife blade between two palms’ technique or do you prefer the ‘stop the knife point with your palm and grab the blade with your free hand’ method?
February 26, 2008 at 7:46 AM #1603974plexowner
Participantdontfollowtheherd – do you recommend the ‘slap the knife blade between two palms’ technique or do you prefer the ‘stop the knife point with your palm and grab the blade with your free hand’ method?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.