- This topic has 120 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 18, 2009 at 7:53 PM #331548January 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM #331030CA renterParticipant
I think the lowball listings are exactly what’s needed to fix the housing mess.
If a house is priced low, we have ample evidence to show it gets quickly bid up to market price: what buyers are willing and able to pay at that particular time.
Why would that be a bad strategy? Seems like the banks could clear their inventory, we could get true price discovery, and strong buyers would be able to buy homes for their families — instead of waiting for years as all the stuck flippers and banks come to the realization that the bubble isn’t coming back to save them.
January 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM #331366CA renterParticipantI think the lowball listings are exactly what’s needed to fix the housing mess.
If a house is priced low, we have ample evidence to show it gets quickly bid up to market price: what buyers are willing and able to pay at that particular time.
Why would that be a bad strategy? Seems like the banks could clear their inventory, we could get true price discovery, and strong buyers would be able to buy homes for their families — instead of waiting for years as all the stuck flippers and banks come to the realization that the bubble isn’t coming back to save them.
January 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM #331444CA renterParticipantI think the lowball listings are exactly what’s needed to fix the housing mess.
If a house is priced low, we have ample evidence to show it gets quickly bid up to market price: what buyers are willing and able to pay at that particular time.
Why would that be a bad strategy? Seems like the banks could clear their inventory, we could get true price discovery, and strong buyers would be able to buy homes for their families — instead of waiting for years as all the stuck flippers and banks come to the realization that the bubble isn’t coming back to save them.
January 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM #331471CA renterParticipantI think the lowball listings are exactly what’s needed to fix the housing mess.
If a house is priced low, we have ample evidence to show it gets quickly bid up to market price: what buyers are willing and able to pay at that particular time.
Why would that be a bad strategy? Seems like the banks could clear their inventory, we could get true price discovery, and strong buyers would be able to buy homes for their families — instead of waiting for years as all the stuck flippers and banks come to the realization that the bubble isn’t coming back to save them.
January 18, 2009 at 8:51 PM #331558CA renterParticipantI think the lowball listings are exactly what’s needed to fix the housing mess.
If a house is priced low, we have ample evidence to show it gets quickly bid up to market price: what buyers are willing and able to pay at that particular time.
Why would that be a bad strategy? Seems like the banks could clear their inventory, we could get true price discovery, and strong buyers would be able to buy homes for their families — instead of waiting for years as all the stuck flippers and banks come to the realization that the bubble isn’t coming back to save them.
January 18, 2009 at 9:27 PM #331045jimg111ParticipantBecause if one sells for below market closings in that area they have to answer to the investors who own the paper as to why they accepted a price significantly below market value. I agree it’s not a bad strategy but many times asset managers will take the first offer in if it’s at the listed price and move on to another file, in that instance the listing agent did a disservice to the owner of the asset.
January 18, 2009 at 9:27 PM #331382jimg111ParticipantBecause if one sells for below market closings in that area they have to answer to the investors who own the paper as to why they accepted a price significantly below market value. I agree it’s not a bad strategy but many times asset managers will take the first offer in if it’s at the listed price and move on to another file, in that instance the listing agent did a disservice to the owner of the asset.
January 18, 2009 at 9:27 PM #331459jimg111ParticipantBecause if one sells for below market closings in that area they have to answer to the investors who own the paper as to why they accepted a price significantly below market value. I agree it’s not a bad strategy but many times asset managers will take the first offer in if it’s at the listed price and move on to another file, in that instance the listing agent did a disservice to the owner of the asset.
January 18, 2009 at 9:27 PM #331486jimg111ParticipantBecause if one sells for below market closings in that area they have to answer to the investors who own the paper as to why they accepted a price significantly below market value. I agree it’s not a bad strategy but many times asset managers will take the first offer in if it’s at the listed price and move on to another file, in that instance the listing agent did a disservice to the owner of the asset.
January 18, 2009 at 9:27 PM #331572jimg111ParticipantBecause if one sells for below market closings in that area they have to answer to the investors who own the paper as to why they accepted a price significantly below market value. I agree it’s not a bad strategy but many times asset managers will take the first offer in if it’s at the listed price and move on to another file, in that instance the listing agent did a disservice to the owner of the asset.
January 18, 2009 at 9:58 PM #331050SD RealtorParticipantHi Jim
My bad for wording my postings so poorly. So let me try to word it better, does the listing agent have any input into the lender for the original list price? Since I do not get any REO listings I don’t want to post something that I do not know about. You seem to be more connected with obtaining REO listings and per your earlier post it seems that the appraisal and BPO are 100% the determining factors.
So with that said it seems that the Chapalita list price was way way way out of whack. I don’t see how the heck a BPO or appraisal could have come in at 360k.
Now I am positive the listing will sell for much higher but would you classify the list price on that home as a boner by the appraiser and BPO? Also if you check out the other Greg Scott listing (search by list agent) would you say the same thing?
January 18, 2009 at 9:58 PM #331387SD RealtorParticipantHi Jim
My bad for wording my postings so poorly. So let me try to word it better, does the listing agent have any input into the lender for the original list price? Since I do not get any REO listings I don’t want to post something that I do not know about. You seem to be more connected with obtaining REO listings and per your earlier post it seems that the appraisal and BPO are 100% the determining factors.
So with that said it seems that the Chapalita list price was way way way out of whack. I don’t see how the heck a BPO or appraisal could have come in at 360k.
Now I am positive the listing will sell for much higher but would you classify the list price on that home as a boner by the appraiser and BPO? Also if you check out the other Greg Scott listing (search by list agent) would you say the same thing?
January 18, 2009 at 9:58 PM #331464SD RealtorParticipantHi Jim
My bad for wording my postings so poorly. So let me try to word it better, does the listing agent have any input into the lender for the original list price? Since I do not get any REO listings I don’t want to post something that I do not know about. You seem to be more connected with obtaining REO listings and per your earlier post it seems that the appraisal and BPO are 100% the determining factors.
So with that said it seems that the Chapalita list price was way way way out of whack. I don’t see how the heck a BPO or appraisal could have come in at 360k.
Now I am positive the listing will sell for much higher but would you classify the list price on that home as a boner by the appraiser and BPO? Also if you check out the other Greg Scott listing (search by list agent) would you say the same thing?
January 18, 2009 at 9:58 PM #331493SD RealtorParticipantHi Jim
My bad for wording my postings so poorly. So let me try to word it better, does the listing agent have any input into the lender for the original list price? Since I do not get any REO listings I don’t want to post something that I do not know about. You seem to be more connected with obtaining REO listings and per your earlier post it seems that the appraisal and BPO are 100% the determining factors.
So with that said it seems that the Chapalita list price was way way way out of whack. I don’t see how the heck a BPO or appraisal could have come in at 360k.
Now I am positive the listing will sell for much higher but would you classify the list price on that home as a boner by the appraiser and BPO? Also if you check out the other Greg Scott listing (search by list agent) would you say the same thing?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.