Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Apparently SD is UNDERvalued right now, by alot
- This topic has 75 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM #411297June 4, 2009 at 4:09 PM #410608
PadreBrian
ParticipantI feel price vs rent is just about right. The high-end stuff needs to fall a bit more, but for the most part, prices in the SD area should fall to pre-bubble prices.
June 4, 2009 at 4:09 PM #410847ParticipantI feel price vs rent is just about right. The high-end stuff needs to fall a bit more, but for the most part, prices in the SD area should fall to pre-bubble prices.
June 4, 2009 at 4:09 PM #411094ParticipantI feel price vs rent is just about right. The high-end stuff needs to fall a bit more, but for the most part, prices in the SD area should fall to pre-bubble prices.
June 4, 2009 at 4:09 PM #411158ParticipantI feel price vs rent is just about right. The high-end stuff needs to fall a bit more, but for the most part, prices in the SD area should fall to pre-bubble prices.
June 4, 2009 at 4:09 PM #411311ParticipantI feel price vs rent is just about right. The high-end stuff needs to fall a bit more, but for the most part, prices in the SD area should fall to pre-bubble prices.
June 4, 2009 at 5:18 PM #410638(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant[quote=paranoid]4 years ago, their methodology would predict that housing price would never fall.[/quote]
Wrong.
The first sentence in the article indicates that it was overpriced by about 40% according to their method.
Also, the chart indicates that their expected value for the price was just above 350K in 2005, while the median was just above 500K.
June 4, 2009 at 5:18 PM #410877Participant[quote=paranoid]4 years ago, their methodology would predict that housing price would never fall.[/quote]
Wrong.
The first sentence in the article indicates that it was overpriced by about 40% according to their method.
Also, the chart indicates that their expected value for the price was just above 350K in 2005, while the median was just above 500K.
June 4, 2009 at 5:18 PM #411124Participant[quote=paranoid]4 years ago, their methodology would predict that housing price would never fall.[/quote]
Wrong.
The first sentence in the article indicates that it was overpriced by about 40% according to their method.
Also, the chart indicates that their expected value for the price was just above 350K in 2005, while the median was just above 500K.
June 4, 2009 at 5:18 PM #411189Participant[quote=paranoid]4 years ago, their methodology would predict that housing price would never fall.[/quote]
Wrong.
The first sentence in the article indicates that it was overpriced by about 40% according to their method.
Also, the chart indicates that their expected value for the price was just above 350K in 2005, while the median was just above 500K.
June 4, 2009 at 5:18 PM #411341Participant[quote=paranoid]4 years ago, their methodology would predict that housing price would never fall.[/quote]
Wrong.
The first sentence in the article indicates that it was overpriced by about 40% according to their method.
Also, the chart indicates that their expected value for the price was just above 350K in 2005, while the median was just above 500K.
June 4, 2009 at 8:18 PM #410718Bob
ParticipantAs others have pointed out, this article is garbage and not worth responding to.
June 4, 2009 at 8:18 PM #410957ParticipantAs others have pointed out, this article is garbage and not worth responding to.
June 4, 2009 at 8:18 PM #411203ParticipantAs others have pointed out, this article is garbage and not worth responding to.
June 4, 2009 at 8:18 PM #411268ParticipantAs others have pointed out, this article is garbage and not worth responding to.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.