Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Anyone considering Buying FNM now?
- This topic has 160 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 6, 2008 at 10:35 AM #267313September 8, 2008 at 7:12 AM #267589CoronitaParticipant
FSD and others,
What do you think about buying FNM now? It’s less than a starbucks latte per share. I figure if I stop going to starbucks frequently. π
Seriously, though. I don’t know what being a “shareholder” in FNM common stock would mean anymore. Not like you have voting power….
September 8, 2008 at 7:12 AM #267810CoronitaParticipantFSD and others,
What do you think about buying FNM now? It’s less than a starbucks latte per share. I figure if I stop going to starbucks frequently. π
Seriously, though. I don’t know what being a “shareholder” in FNM common stock would mean anymore. Not like you have voting power….
September 8, 2008 at 7:12 AM #267825CoronitaParticipantFSD and others,
What do you think about buying FNM now? It’s less than a starbucks latte per share. I figure if I stop going to starbucks frequently. π
Seriously, though. I don’t know what being a “shareholder” in FNM common stock would mean anymore. Not like you have voting power….
September 8, 2008 at 7:12 AM #267873CoronitaParticipantFSD and others,
What do you think about buying FNM now? It’s less than a starbucks latte per share. I figure if I stop going to starbucks frequently. π
Seriously, though. I don’t know what being a “shareholder” in FNM common stock would mean anymore. Not like you have voting power….
September 8, 2008 at 7:12 AM #267903CoronitaParticipantFSD and others,
What do you think about buying FNM now? It’s less than a starbucks latte per share. I figure if I stop going to starbucks frequently. π
Seriously, though. I don’t know what being a “shareholder” in FNM common stock would mean anymore. Not like you have voting power….
September 8, 2008 at 8:04 AM #267604(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI have no clue. Too many bureaucrats involved in the decision-making.
September 8, 2008 at 8:04 AM #267824(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI have no clue. Too many bureaucrats involved in the decision-making.
September 8, 2008 at 8:04 AM #267840(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI have no clue. Too many bureaucrats involved in the decision-making.
September 8, 2008 at 8:04 AM #267888(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI have no clue. Too many bureaucrats involved in the decision-making.
September 8, 2008 at 8:04 AM #267918(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI have no clue. Too many bureaucrats involved in the decision-making.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.