- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 7 months ago by powayseller.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 16, 2006 at 4:06 PM #6417March 16, 2006 at 4:27 PM #23697sdrebearParticipant
Almost forgot to touch on the one stat that NAR considered more important than any other; The Mortgage Servicing Cost to Income Ratio.
They said it was a little high, but not as high as in the early 1980’s (like it was a GOOD thing!) Unless they were only referring to the one spike in 1981 when the Prime Rate was pegged at 20%+, then we are now in fact well above any other point on their nice little graph. We are well above even though we have historically low interest rates and loan points! Ah, but home prices are not too high. If rates and points (the other small factors in calculating the mortgage servicing cost) return to more “normal” levels, then I’m sure those home prices will hold firm, right? Not.
March 16, 2006 at 9:32 PM #23698powaysellerParticipantIf we eliminated interest only and option ARM financing, and compared our mortgage costs on the basis of the payment on a 30 yr fixed loan, then the mortgage servicing costs today would be much much higher.
Funny post.
I would write the NAR, but it would be just a waste of time. Think of it this way: if we worked for them, what would we say? If we spoke the truth, we’d be fired. Their job is promoting real estate, not being an economic forecaster. Unfortunately, they’ve done an excellent job of convincing us that they know it all. Each time I tell someone not to buy RE now because it’s overvalued, I get the question, “Are you a realtor?” I’m going to start saying, “No, I can’t. I know too much…”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.