A home is a lousy investment (wsj)

[eavesdropper]

[quote=carlsbadworker][quote=eavesdropper] TG, don’t you think you’re being a little picky over the whole data thing?[/quote]

Excuse me, but I only wish I could be as funny as TG. We are not the same person although we do live in the same city.[/quote]

carlsbad, thank you for the heads-up on my misidentification. I would not want to give credit for being picky to TG when it rightfully belongs to you.

However, your post did cause me to notice the glaring absence of a similar notification from TG. Since he lives in your city, I think that you should march right on over to his house, and demand to know why he’s taking credit for an insult that rightfully belongs to you.

Seriously, sorry about the error. But it was 4:30 a.m. EST, and I really should have known better than to still be responding to Piggs posts, given my level of extreme fatigue. And you’re not really picky. It’s just that the WSJ has been turned another version of the London Daily Mail, with meaningless graphs instead of pictures of 8 year-olds who use Botox.

[temeculaguy]

ED, I was just alerted to this thread by a friend, I assure you carlsbadworker and I are not the same person. While an enticing social experiment, I am way too narcissistic to use two screen names for fear of losing credit. I’m also not a big fan of the WSJ, so much so that I didn’t even read the article because I’m so arrogant (I prefer the word confidant) that I can already assume what it says and it’s beneath me. Of course once the WSJ and Time and other sources say that housing is a bad investment, that’s when I think it is a good one.

[temeculaguy]

ED, I was just alerted to this thread by a friend, I assure you carlsbadworker and I are not the same person. While an enticing social experiment, I am way too narcissistic to use two screen names for fear of losing credit. I’m also not a big fan of the WSJ, so much so that I didn’t even read the article because I’m so arrogant (I prefer the word confidant) that I can already assume what it says and it’s beneath me. Of course once the WSJ and Time and other sources say that housing is a bad investment, that’s when I think it is a good one.

[temeculaguy]

ED, I was just alerted to this thread by a friend, I assure you carlsbadworker and I are not the same person. While an enticing social experiment, I am way too narcissistic to use two screen names for fear of losing credit. I’m also not a big fan of the WSJ, so much so that I didn’t even read the article because I’m so arrogant (I prefer the word confidant) that I can already assume what it says and it’s beneath me. Of course once the WSJ and Time and other sources say that housing is a bad investment, that’s when I think it is a good one.

[temeculaguy]

ED, I was just alerted to this thread by a friend, I assure you carlsbadworker and I are not the same person. While an enticing social experiment, I am way too narcissistic to use two screen names for fear of losing credit. I’m also not a big fan of the WSJ, so much so that I didn’t even read the article because I’m so arrogant (I prefer the word confidant) that I can already assume what it says and it’s beneath me. Of course once the WSJ and Time and other sources say that housing is a bad investment, that’s when I think it is a good one.

[temeculaguy]

ED, I was just alerted to this thread by a friend, I assure you carlsbadworker and I are not the same person. While an enticing social experiment, I am way too narcissistic to use two screen names for fear of losing credit. I’m also not a big fan of the WSJ, so much so that I didn’t even read the article because I’m so arrogant (I prefer the word confidant) that I can already assume what it says and it’s beneath me. Of course once the WSJ and Time and other sources say that housing is a bad investment, that’s when I think it is a good one.

[Author]

Posts