A fresh sign of delusion

[barnaby33]

Its not a super high price but it certainly isn’t a deal. Its in the heart of Clairemont. I lived close to that area in BayHo a few years ago. Not a bad area at all, but a tough sell for half a million dollars.

[PadreBrian]

LOL, the only reason they aren’t using a Realtor, is because he/she laughed at the price they wanted. They must think it’s 2006, “Accepting Offers $550,000-$600,000″…indeed. They wouldn’t be a bad price for a newish energy efficient house and USABLE land.

BTW, F them for protesting against the Regents road bridge.

[PadreBrian]

LOL, the only reason they aren’t using a Realtor, is because he/she laughed at the price they wanted. They must think it’s 2006, “Accepting Offers $550,000-$600,000″…indeed. They wouldn’t be a bad price for a newish energy efficient house and USABLE land.

BTW, F them for protesting against the Regents road bridge.

[PadreBrian]

LOL, the only reason they aren’t using a Realtor, is because he/she laughed at the price they wanted. They must think it’s 2006, “Accepting Offers $550,000-$600,000″…indeed. They wouldn’t be a bad price for a newish energy efficient house and USABLE land.

BTW, F them for protesting against the Regents road bridge.

[PadreBrian]

LOL, the only reason they aren’t using a Realtor, is because he/she laughed at the price they wanted. They must think it’s 2006, “Accepting Offers $550,000-$600,000″…indeed. They wouldn’t be a bad price for a newish energy efficient house and USABLE land.

BTW, F them for protesting against the Regents road bridge.

[PadreBrian]

LOL, the only reason they aren’t using a Realtor, is because he/she laughed at the price they wanted. They must think it’s 2006, “Accepting Offers $550,000-$600,000″…indeed. They wouldn’t be a bad price for a newish energy efficient house and USABLE land.

BTW, F them for protesting against the Regents road bridge.

[UCGal]

The price isn’t totally delusional – they’re not trying to get the 7/07 pricing. It is a pretty nice location – a nicer part of Clairemont with Canyon views and nice breezes. (I’m on the other side of the canyon from them.)

Yes the lot is probably largely sloped/unusable. But it’s still a HUGE lot by city of SD standards.

I don’t know if they’ll get the price within their range – but it’s not completely wacked.

From an estate tax point of view – they have to sell or get an appraisal within 6 months of the death. So they’ll either sell or know what an appraiser thinks the property is worth pretty soon.

Not sure about the comment on the Regents Rd bridge… I’m one of the few UC residents strongly in FAVOR of the bridge… but I live closer to Genessee. I don’t see how you could discern if these people tried to block it. It wouldn’t make sense – the bridge will cause traffic through UC going to 52… not so much the Clairemont side of things.

[UCGal]

The price isn’t totally delusional – they’re not trying to get the 7/07 pricing. It is a pretty nice location – a nicer part of Clairemont with Canyon views and nice breezes. (I’m on the other side of the canyon from them.)

Yes the lot is probably largely sloped/unusable. But it’s still a HUGE lot by city of SD standards.

I don’t know if they’ll get the price within their range – but it’s not completely wacked.

From an estate tax point of view – they have to sell or get an appraisal within 6 months of the death. So they’ll either sell or know what an appraiser thinks the property is worth pretty soon.

Not sure about the comment on the Regents Rd bridge… I’m one of the few UC residents strongly in FAVOR of the bridge… but I live closer to Genessee. I don’t see how you could discern if these people tried to block it. It wouldn’t make sense – the bridge will cause traffic through UC going to 52… not so much the Clairemont side of things.

[UCGal]

The price isn’t totally delusional – they’re not trying to get the 7/07 pricing. It is a pretty nice location – a nicer part of Clairemont with Canyon views and nice breezes. (I’m on the other side of the canyon from them.)

Yes the lot is probably largely sloped/unusable. But it’s still a HUGE lot by city of SD standards.

I don’t know if they’ll get the price within their range – but it’s not completely wacked.

From an estate tax point of view – they have to sell or get an appraisal within 6 months of the death. So they’ll either sell or know what an appraiser thinks the property is worth pretty soon.

Not sure about the comment on the Regents Rd bridge… I’m one of the few UC residents strongly in FAVOR of the bridge… but I live closer to Genessee. I don’t see how you could discern if these people tried to block it. It wouldn’t make sense – the bridge will cause traffic through UC going to 52… not so much the Clairemont side of things.

[UCGal]

The price isn’t totally delusional – they’re not trying to get the 7/07 pricing. It is a pretty nice location – a nicer part of Clairemont with Canyon views and nice breezes. (I’m on the other side of the canyon from them.)

Yes the lot is probably largely sloped/unusable. But it’s still a HUGE lot by city of SD standards.

I don’t know if they’ll get the price within their range – but it’s not completely wacked.

From an estate tax point of view – they have to sell or get an appraisal within 6 months of the death. So they’ll either sell or know what an appraiser thinks the property is worth pretty soon.

Not sure about the comment on the Regents Rd bridge… I’m one of the few UC residents strongly in FAVOR of the bridge… but I live closer to Genessee. I don’t see how you could discern if these people tried to block it. It wouldn’t make sense – the bridge will cause traffic through UC going to 52… not so much the Clairemont side of things.

[UCGal]

The price isn’t totally delusional – they’re not trying to get the 7/07 pricing. It is a pretty nice location – a nicer part of Clairemont with Canyon views and nice breezes. (I’m on the other side of the canyon from them.)

Yes the lot is probably largely sloped/unusable. But it’s still a HUGE lot by city of SD standards.

I don’t know if they’ll get the price within their range – but it’s not completely wacked.

From an estate tax point of view – they have to sell or get an appraisal within 6 months of the death. So they’ll either sell or know what an appraiser thinks the property is worth pretty soon.

Not sure about the comment on the Regents Rd bridge… I’m one of the few UC residents strongly in FAVOR of the bridge… but I live closer to Genessee. I don’t see how you could discern if these people tried to block it. It wouldn’t make sense – the bridge will cause traffic through UC going to 52… not so much the Clairemont side of things.

[sdrealtor]

Still waiting for our own Mr Clairemontduuddde to weigh in on this one.

[sdrealtor]

Still waiting for our own Mr Clairemontduuddde to weigh in on this one.

[sdrealtor]

Still waiting for our own Mr Clairemontduuddde to weigh in on this one.

[sdrealtor]

Still waiting for our own Mr Clairemontduuddde to weigh in on this one.

[Author]

Posts