Menu

Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › 4s Ranch and New Development

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 121 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 11, 2009 at 10:43 PM #468308
    Eugene
    Participant

    [quote=captcha]

    Do you think the scores will be on the higher end?[/quote]

    Most likely, yes. I expect the scores to be substantially better than Mt Carmel and possibly rivalling Westview and Torrey Pines.

    October 12, 2009 at 10:07 AM #467587
    Sandiagon
    Participant

    Generally new development will not help prices go down. Only existing homes will help prices goes down.

    October 12, 2009 at 10:07 AM #467768
    Sandiagon
    Participant

    Generally new development will not help prices go down. Only existing homes will help prices goes down.

    October 12, 2009 at 10:07 AM #468124
    Sandiagon
    Participant

    Generally new development will not help prices go down. Only existing homes will help prices goes down.

    October 12, 2009 at 10:07 AM #468196
    Sandiagon
    Participant

    Generally new development will not help prices go down. Only existing homes will help prices goes down.

    October 12, 2009 at 10:07 AM #468408
    Sandiagon
    Participant

    Generally new development will not help prices go down. Only existing homes will help prices goes down.

    October 12, 2009 at 10:28 AM #467592
    an
    Participant

    They’re finally building smaller houses on larger lots again. That’s definitely a good sign in my eyes. ~2200 sq-ft on a 6900 sq-ft lot sounds great to me. The question then becomes, would they help pay the MR too?

    October 12, 2009 at 10:28 AM #467773
    an
    Participant

    They’re finally building smaller houses on larger lots again. That’s definitely a good sign in my eyes. ~2200 sq-ft on a 6900 sq-ft lot sounds great to me. The question then becomes, would they help pay the MR too?

    October 12, 2009 at 10:28 AM #468129
    an
    Participant

    They’re finally building smaller houses on larger lots again. That’s definitely a good sign in my eyes. ~2200 sq-ft on a 6900 sq-ft lot sounds great to me. The question then becomes, would they help pay the MR too?

    October 12, 2009 at 10:28 AM #468201
    an
    Participant

    They’re finally building smaller houses on larger lots again. That’s definitely a good sign in my eyes. ~2200 sq-ft on a 6900 sq-ft lot sounds great to me. The question then becomes, would they help pay the MR too?

    October 12, 2009 at 10:28 AM #468413
    an
    Participant

    They’re finally building smaller houses on larger lots again. That’s definitely a good sign in my eyes. ~2200 sq-ft on a 6900 sq-ft lot sounds great to me. The question then becomes, would they help pay the MR too?

    October 13, 2009 at 12:15 PM #468138
    sdcellar
    Participant

    The 2200 square foot model looks to be a single level, so it would seem that the lots will still be pretty small for what’s on them.

    California West appears to be the same builder that did the Serramar development in the southern-most reaches of La Mesa.

    It’d be interesting to understand the financials behind them as well as the substance behind rumors regarding Fieldstone (and StanPac to a lesser extent).

    Getting builders back to shouldering more of the infrastructure costs would be great. M-R has become a bubble of it’s own sort, especially in PSD.

    October 13, 2009 at 12:15 PM #468321
    sdcellar
    Participant

    The 2200 square foot model looks to be a single level, so it would seem that the lots will still be pretty small for what’s on them.

    California West appears to be the same builder that did the Serramar development in the southern-most reaches of La Mesa.

    It’d be interesting to understand the financials behind them as well as the substance behind rumors regarding Fieldstone (and StanPac to a lesser extent).

    Getting builders back to shouldering more of the infrastructure costs would be great. M-R has become a bubble of it’s own sort, especially in PSD.

    October 13, 2009 at 12:15 PM #468679
    sdcellar
    Participant

    The 2200 square foot model looks to be a single level, so it would seem that the lots will still be pretty small for what’s on them.

    California West appears to be the same builder that did the Serramar development in the southern-most reaches of La Mesa.

    It’d be interesting to understand the financials behind them as well as the substance behind rumors regarding Fieldstone (and StanPac to a lesser extent).

    Getting builders back to shouldering more of the infrastructure costs would be great. M-R has become a bubble of it’s own sort, especially in PSD.

    October 13, 2009 at 12:15 PM #468751
    sdcellar
    Participant

    The 2200 square foot model looks to be a single level, so it would seem that the lots will still be pretty small for what’s on them.

    California West appears to be the same builder that did the Serramar development in the southern-most reaches of La Mesa.

    It’d be interesting to understand the financials behind them as well as the substance behind rumors regarding Fieldstone (and StanPac to a lesser extent).

    Getting builders back to shouldering more of the infrastructure costs would be great. M-R has become a bubble of it’s own sort, especially in PSD.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 121 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
  • The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.