Menu

Home › Forums › Housing › 33% loss (single family home) in Mira Mesa

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 76 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 30, 2007 at 11:25 AM #105721
    Eugene
    Participant

    Aren’t some homes in this area already in the 300’s?

    Not in this specific neighborhood. Some homes in 92126 are, but this area is considerably newer than most of 92126 (built in 1989 as opposed to early 70’s). Better comparison is vs. 92121 (Sorrento Valley) or south 92129 (RP south of 56) and you’ll have a hard time finding a 4br house there for less than 600k.

    November 30, 2007 at 11:41 AM #105585
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    What do you mean by carrying coast?
    Sorry I meant costs: PITI. The mortgage is only P&I. You still have to account for about $450 per month in property tax and about 75-100 bucks for insurance.

    November 30, 2007 at 11:41 AM #105676
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    What do you mean by carrying coast?
    Sorry I meant costs: PITI. The mortgage is only P&I. You still have to account for about $450 per month in property tax and about 75-100 bucks for insurance.

    November 30, 2007 at 11:41 AM #105709
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    What do you mean by carrying coast?
    Sorry I meant costs: PITI. The mortgage is only P&I. You still have to account for about $450 per month in property tax and about 75-100 bucks for insurance.

    November 30, 2007 at 11:41 AM #105717
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    What do you mean by carrying coast?
    Sorry I meant costs: PITI. The mortgage is only P&I. You still have to account for about $450 per month in property tax and about 75-100 bucks for insurance.

    November 30, 2007 at 11:41 AM #105735
    (former)FormerSanDiegan
    Participant

    What do you mean by carrying coast?
    Sorry I meant costs: PITI. The mortgage is only P&I. You still have to account for about $450 per month in property tax and about 75-100 bucks for insurance.

    November 30, 2007 at 12:51 PM #105614
    an
    Participant

    If you account for property tax, then you also have to account for tax deduction as well.

    November 30, 2007 at 12:51 PM #105703
    an
    Participant

    If you account for property tax, then you also have to account for tax deduction as well.

    November 30, 2007 at 12:51 PM #105738
    an
    Participant

    If you account for property tax, then you also have to account for tax deduction as well.

    November 30, 2007 at 12:51 PM #105747
    an
    Participant

    If you account for property tax, then you also have to account for tax deduction as well.

    November 30, 2007 at 12:51 PM #105763
    an
    Participant

    If you account for property tax, then you also have to account for tax deduction as well.

    November 30, 2007 at 12:54 PM #105623
    ibjames
    Participant

    Even though it is approaching rental numbers, don’t you guys think that this area could depreciate more?

    November 30, 2007 at 12:54 PM #105713
    ibjames
    Participant

    Even though it is approaching rental numbers, don’t you guys think that this area could depreciate more?

    November 30, 2007 at 12:54 PM #105748
    ibjames
    Participant

    Even though it is approaching rental numbers, don’t you guys think that this area could depreciate more?

    November 30, 2007 at 12:54 PM #105757
    ibjames
    Participant

    Even though it is approaching rental numbers, don’t you guys think that this area could depreciate more?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 76 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.