- This topic has 495 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 1 month ago by
equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 2, 2008 at 1:09 PM #14353November 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM #296726
blahblahblah
ParticipantThe news has been running lots of stories lately about why exit polls are inaccurate. Never mind the fact that they are the standard for monitoring election fairness in countries around the world. Just know that they are inaccurate and not to be trusted, unlike the electronic machines of course which can never be wrong, because they’re — ummm, electronic, yeah that’s why.
November 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM #297070blahblahblah
ParticipantThe news has been running lots of stories lately about why exit polls are inaccurate. Never mind the fact that they are the standard for monitoring election fairness in countries around the world. Just know that they are inaccurate and not to be trusted, unlike the electronic machines of course which can never be wrong, because they’re — ummm, electronic, yeah that’s why.
November 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM #297086blahblahblah
ParticipantThe news has been running lots of stories lately about why exit polls are inaccurate. Never mind the fact that they are the standard for monitoring election fairness in countries around the world. Just know that they are inaccurate and not to be trusted, unlike the electronic machines of course which can never be wrong, because they’re — ummm, electronic, yeah that’s why.
November 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM #297099blahblahblah
ParticipantThe news has been running lots of stories lately about why exit polls are inaccurate. Never mind the fact that they are the standard for monitoring election fairness in countries around the world. Just know that they are inaccurate and not to be trusted, unlike the electronic machines of course which can never be wrong, because they’re — ummm, electronic, yeah that’s why.
November 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM #297143blahblahblah
ParticipantThe news has been running lots of stories lately about why exit polls are inaccurate. Never mind the fact that they are the standard for monitoring election fairness in countries around the world. Just know that they are inaccurate and not to be trusted, unlike the electronic machines of course which can never be wrong, because they’re — ummm, electronic, yeah that’s why.
November 2, 2008 at 2:00 PM #296731Kilohana
ParticipantIf what you say is true, there is a lot of money to be made here.
Good luck!
November 2, 2008 at 2:00 PM #297074Kilohana
ParticipantIf what you say is true, there is a lot of money to be made here.
Good luck!
November 2, 2008 at 2:00 PM #297091Kilohana
ParticipantIf what you say is true, there is a lot of money to be made here.
Good luck!
November 2, 2008 at 2:00 PM #297104Kilohana
ParticipantIf what you say is true, there is a lot of money to be made here.
Good luck!
November 2, 2008 at 2:00 PM #297148Kilohana
ParticipantIf what you say is true, there is a lot of money to be made here.
Good luck!
November 2, 2008 at 2:10 PM #296736partypup
ParticipantI don’t need the luck. I don’t bet on anything that can be fixed, including the stock market.
In any event, the gamblers at inTrade are simply looking at the poll results and not their methodology.
November 2, 2008 at 2:10 PM #297080partypup
ParticipantI don’t need the luck. I don’t bet on anything that can be fixed, including the stock market.
In any event, the gamblers at inTrade are simply looking at the poll results and not their methodology.
November 2, 2008 at 2:10 PM #297097partypup
ParticipantI don’t need the luck. I don’t bet on anything that can be fixed, including the stock market.
In any event, the gamblers at inTrade are simply looking at the poll results and not their methodology.
November 2, 2008 at 2:10 PM #297109partypup
ParticipantI don’t need the luck. I don’t bet on anything that can be fixed, including the stock market.
In any event, the gamblers at inTrade are simply looking at the poll results and not their methodology.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
