[Zeitgeist]

Not trying to kill the thread, but probably will by using the Hitler analogy. He demonized the Jewish bankers and the Dems. demonize wallstreet, yet voted for the bail outs! Huh? The government is the problem. Wake up and smell the corruption of both parties. Bush started it and no one is stopping it. Where is the change? Where is the transperancy?

[Zeitgeist]

Not trying to kill the thread, but probably will by using the Hitler analogy. He demonized the Jewish bankers and the Dems. demonize wallstreet, yet voted for the bail outs! Huh? The government is the problem. Wake up and smell the corruption of both parties. Bush started it and no one is stopping it. Where is the change? Where is the transperancy?

[Zeitgeist]

Not trying to kill the thread, but probably will by using the Hitler analogy. He demonized the Jewish bankers and the Dems. demonize wallstreet, yet voted for the bail outs! Huh? The government is the problem. Wake up and smell the corruption of both parties. Bush started it and no one is stopping it. Where is the change? Where is the transperancy?

[Zeitgeist]

Not trying to kill the thread, but probably will by using the Hitler analogy. He demonized the Jewish bankers and the Dems. demonize wallstreet, yet voted for the bail outs! Huh? The government is the problem. Wake up and smell the corruption of both parties. Bush started it and no one is stopping it. Where is the change? Where is the transperancy?

[Zeitgeist]

Not trying to kill the thread, but probably will by using the Hitler analogy. He demonized the Jewish bankers and the Dems. demonize wallstreet, yet voted for the bail outs! Huh? The government is the problem. Wake up and smell the corruption of both parties. Bush started it and no one is stopping it. Where is the change? Where is the transperancy?

[Zeitgeist]

Does THE PLAN exempt federal OFFICIALS from COURT REVIEW? HR3200[img_assist|nid=11722|title=fishy|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=70]

What it says, page 124, Section 223, PAYMENT RATES FOR ITEMS AND SERVICES:

(f) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review of a payment rate or methodology established under this section or under section 224.

And, page 256, SEC. 1123. PAYMENTS FOR EFFICIENT AREAS.

‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1869, 1878, or otherwise, respecting—

‘‘(i) the identification of a county or other area under subparagraph (A); or

‘‘(ii) the assignment of a postal ZIP Code to a county or other area under subparagraph (B).

EVALUATION OF THE PASSAGES:

1. Sec. 1123 amends the Social Security Act, to allow the Secretary to identify areas of the country that underutilize the government’s plan “based on per capita spending.”

2. Parts of the plan are set above the review of the courts.

[Zeitgeist]

Does THE PLAN exempt federal OFFICIALS from COURT REVIEW? HR3200[img_assist|nid=11722|title=fishy|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=70]

What it says, page 124, Section 223, PAYMENT RATES FOR ITEMS AND SERVICES:

(f) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review of a payment rate or methodology established under this section or under section 224.

And, page 256, SEC. 1123. PAYMENTS FOR EFFICIENT AREAS.

‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1869, 1878, or otherwise, respecting—

‘‘(i) the identification of a county or other area under subparagraph (A); or

‘‘(ii) the assignment of a postal ZIP Code to a county or other area under subparagraph (B).

EVALUATION OF THE PASSAGES:

1. Sec. 1123 amends the Social Security Act, to allow the Secretary to identify areas of the country that underutilize the government’s plan “based on per capita spending.”

2. Parts of the plan are set above the review of the courts.

[Zeitgeist]

Does THE PLAN exempt federal OFFICIALS from COURT REVIEW? HR3200[img_assist|nid=11722|title=fishy|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=70]

What it says, page 124, Section 223, PAYMENT RATES FOR ITEMS AND SERVICES:

(f) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review of a payment rate or methodology established under this section or under section 224.

And, page 256, SEC. 1123. PAYMENTS FOR EFFICIENT AREAS.

‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1869, 1878, or otherwise, respecting—

‘‘(i) the identification of a county or other area under subparagraph (A); or

‘‘(ii) the assignment of a postal ZIP Code to a county or other area under subparagraph (B).

EVALUATION OF THE PASSAGES:

1. Sec. 1123 amends the Social Security Act, to allow the Secretary to identify areas of the country that underutilize the government’s plan “based on per capita spending.”

2. Parts of the plan are set above the review of the courts.

[Zeitgeist]

Does THE PLAN exempt federal OFFICIALS from COURT REVIEW? HR3200[img_assist|nid=11722|title=fishy|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=70]

What it says, page 124, Section 223, PAYMENT RATES FOR ITEMS AND SERVICES:

(f) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review of a payment rate or methodology established under this section or under section 224.

And, page 256, SEC. 1123. PAYMENTS FOR EFFICIENT AREAS.

‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1869, 1878, or otherwise, respecting—

‘‘(i) the identification of a county or other area under subparagraph (A); or

‘‘(ii) the assignment of a postal ZIP Code to a county or other area under subparagraph (B).

EVALUATION OF THE PASSAGES:

1. Sec. 1123 amends the Social Security Act, to allow the Secretary to identify areas of the country that underutilize the government’s plan “based on per capita spending.”

2. Parts of the plan are set above the review of the courts.

[Zeitgeist]

Does THE PLAN exempt federal OFFICIALS from COURT REVIEW? HR3200[img_assist|nid=11722|title=fishy|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=70]

What it says, page 124, Section 223, PAYMENT RATES FOR ITEMS AND SERVICES:

(f) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review of a payment rate or methodology established under this section or under section 224.

And, page 256, SEC. 1123. PAYMENTS FOR EFFICIENT AREAS.

‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review under section 1869, 1878, or otherwise, respecting—

‘‘(i) the identification of a county or other area under subparagraph (A); or

‘‘(ii) the assignment of a postal ZIP Code to a county or other area under subparagraph (B).

EVALUATION OF THE PASSAGES:

1. Sec. 1123 amends the Social Security Act, to allow the Secretary to identify areas of the country that underutilize the government’s plan “based on per capita spending.”

2. Parts of the plan are set above the review of the courts.

[Zeitgeist]

Never piss off flu:

What Mr. Mueller discovered is that sodium silicate is the designated agent of death for cars surrendered under the federal cash-for-clunkers program. To receive government reimbursement, auto dealers who offer rebates on new cars in exchange for so-called clunkers must agree to “kill” the old models, using a method the government outlines in great detail in its 136-page manual for dealers: Drain the engine of oil and replace it with two quarts of a sodium-silicate solution.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124934376942503053.html

[Zeitgeist]

Never piss off flu:

What Mr. Mueller discovered is that sodium silicate is the designated agent of death for cars surrendered under the federal cash-for-clunkers program. To receive government reimbursement, auto dealers who offer rebates on new cars in exchange for so-called clunkers must agree to “kill” the old models, using a method the government outlines in great detail in its 136-page manual for dealers: Drain the engine of oil and replace it with two quarts of a sodium-silicate solution.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124934376942503053.html

[Zeitgeist]

Never piss off flu:

What Mr. Mueller discovered is that sodium silicate is the designated agent of death for cars surrendered under the federal cash-for-clunkers program. To receive government reimbursement, auto dealers who offer rebates on new cars in exchange for so-called clunkers must agree to “kill” the old models, using a method the government outlines in great detail in its 136-page manual for dealers: Drain the engine of oil and replace it with two quarts of a sodium-silicate solution.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124934376942503053.html

[Zeitgeist]

Never piss off flu:

What Mr. Mueller discovered is that sodium silicate is the designated agent of death for cars surrendered under the federal cash-for-clunkers program. To receive government reimbursement, auto dealers who offer rebates on new cars in exchange for so-called clunkers must agree to “kill” the old models, using a method the government outlines in great detail in its 136-page manual for dealers: Drain the engine of oil and replace it with two quarts of a sodium-silicate solution.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124934376942503053.html

[Zeitgeist]

Never piss off flu:

What Mr. Mueller discovered is that sodium silicate is the designated agent of death for cars surrendered under the federal cash-for-clunkers program. To receive government reimbursement, auto dealers who offer rebates on new cars in exchange for so-called clunkers must agree to “kill” the old models, using a method the government outlines in great detail in its 136-page manual for dealers: Drain the engine of oil and replace it with two quarts of a sodium-silicate solution.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124934376942503053.html

[Author]

Posts