[XBoxBoy]

Scaredy,

Whatever you think, just remember it’s your fault.

http://www.jamesaltucher.com/2011/05/its-your-fault/

[XBoxBoy]

Scaredy,

Whatever you think, just remember it’s your fault.

http://www.jamesaltucher.com/2011/05/its-your-fault/

[XBoxBoy]

Scaredy,

Whatever you think, just remember it’s your fault.

http://www.jamesaltucher.com/2011/05/its-your-fault/

[XBoxBoy]

I have no idea which one will actually get the nomination, but one things for sure. Whoever does will have to raise buckets of money, and so will be heavily indebted to the bankers, big pharm, and other special interest groups that are raping our country. I pretty much guarantee that whoever runs, and regardless of whoever wins, we’ll still get more of the same crap that passes for governing in this country.

[XBoxBoy]

I have no idea which one will actually get the nomination, but one things for sure. Whoever does will have to raise buckets of money, and so will be heavily indebted to the bankers, big pharm, and other special interest groups that are raping our country. I pretty much guarantee that whoever runs, and regardless of whoever wins, we’ll still get more of the same crap that passes for governing in this country.

[XBoxBoy]

I have no idea which one will actually get the nomination, but one things for sure. Whoever does will have to raise buckets of money, and so will be heavily indebted to the bankers, big pharm, and other special interest groups that are raping our country. I pretty much guarantee that whoever runs, and regardless of whoever wins, we’ll still get more of the same crap that passes for governing in this country.

[XBoxBoy]

I have no idea which one will actually get the nomination, but one things for sure. Whoever does will have to raise buckets of money, and so will be heavily indebted to the bankers, big pharm, and other special interest groups that are raping our country. I pretty much guarantee that whoever runs, and regardless of whoever wins, we’ll still get more of the same crap that passes for governing in this country.

[XBoxBoy]

I have no idea which one will actually get the nomination, but one things for sure. Whoever does will have to raise buckets of money, and so will be heavily indebted to the bankers, big pharm, and other special interest groups that are raping our country. I pretty much guarantee that whoever runs, and regardless of whoever wins, we’ll still get more of the same crap that passes for governing in this country.

[XBoxBoy]

[quote=njtosd]All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem.[/quote]

SDLookup does not list them once they are pending. (They do list contingent though. And in case you’re not aware, contingent and pending are different)

[quote=njtosd]And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .[/quote]

There is an option for the realtor to check that signals this listing is NOT to be put on the internet. That could be because the agent prefers to find a buyer and thus get both halves of the commission, or because the agent doesn’t want to hassle with internet shoppers (wanting instead buyers represented by other agents) or because the seller doesn’t want the fact they are selling or the info about the listing to be publicly available. At other times agents don’t list on the mls at all, (so called pocket listings) in hopes that they can get both sides of the deal.

While I agree that it would be in the sellers interest to have the listing out on the internet as soon as possible, I’ve seen/heard lots of things done/said that are not in the seller’s interest by their agents.

[XBoxBoy]

[quote=njtosd]All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem.[/quote]

SDLookup does not list them once they are pending. (They do list contingent though. And in case you’re not aware, contingent and pending are different)

[quote=njtosd]And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .[/quote]

There is an option for the realtor to check that signals this listing is NOT to be put on the internet. That could be because the agent prefers to find a buyer and thus get both halves of the commission, or because the agent doesn’t want to hassle with internet shoppers (wanting instead buyers represented by other agents) or because the seller doesn’t want the fact they are selling or the info about the listing to be publicly available. At other times agents don’t list on the mls at all, (so called pocket listings) in hopes that they can get both sides of the deal.

While I agree that it would be in the sellers interest to have the listing out on the internet as soon as possible, I’ve seen/heard lots of things done/said that are not in the seller’s interest by their agents.

[XBoxBoy]

[quote=njtosd]All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem.[/quote]

SDLookup does not list them once they are pending. (They do list contingent though. And in case you’re not aware, contingent and pending are different)

[quote=njtosd]And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .[/quote]

There is an option for the realtor to check that signals this listing is NOT to be put on the internet. That could be because the agent prefers to find a buyer and thus get both halves of the commission, or because the agent doesn’t want to hassle with internet shoppers (wanting instead buyers represented by other agents) or because the seller doesn’t want the fact they are selling or the info about the listing to be publicly available. At other times agents don’t list on the mls at all, (so called pocket listings) in hopes that they can get both sides of the deal.

While I agree that it would be in the sellers interest to have the listing out on the internet as soon as possible, I’ve seen/heard lots of things done/said that are not in the seller’s interest by their agents.

[XBoxBoy]

[quote=njtosd]All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem.[/quote]

SDLookup does not list them once they are pending. (They do list contingent though. And in case you’re not aware, contingent and pending are different)

[quote=njtosd]And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .[/quote]

There is an option for the realtor to check that signals this listing is NOT to be put on the internet. That could be because the agent prefers to find a buyer and thus get both halves of the commission, or because the agent doesn’t want to hassle with internet shoppers (wanting instead buyers represented by other agents) or because the seller doesn’t want the fact they are selling or the info about the listing to be publicly available. At other times agents don’t list on the mls at all, (so called pocket listings) in hopes that they can get both sides of the deal.

While I agree that it would be in the sellers interest to have the listing out on the internet as soon as possible, I’ve seen/heard lots of things done/said that are not in the seller’s interest by their agents.

[XBoxBoy]

[quote=njtosd]All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem.[/quote]

SDLookup does not list them once they are pending. (They do list contingent though. And in case you’re not aware, contingent and pending are different)

[quote=njtosd]And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .[/quote]

There is an option for the realtor to check that signals this listing is NOT to be put on the internet. That could be because the agent prefers to find a buyer and thus get both halves of the commission, or because the agent doesn’t want to hassle with internet shoppers (wanting instead buyers represented by other agents) or because the seller doesn’t want the fact they are selling or the info about the listing to be publicly available. At other times agents don’t list on the mls at all, (so called pocket listings) in hopes that they can get both sides of the deal.

While I agree that it would be in the sellers interest to have the listing out on the internet as soon as possible, I’ve seen/heard lots of things done/said that are not in the seller’s interest by their agents.

[XBoxBoy]

Second the suggestion of checking the La Jolla Light and Village News. You have boxes where you can pick them up for free all around the village.

Also, there are lots of open houses on saturdays lately, so drive around a bit on saturday.

[XBoxBoy]

Second the suggestion of checking the La Jolla Light and Village News. You have boxes where you can pick them up for free all around the village.

Also, there are lots of open houses on saturdays lately, so drive around a bit on saturday.

[Author]

Posts