Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
XBoxBoy
ParticipantScaredy,
Whatever you think, just remember it’s your fault.
XBoxBoy
ParticipantScaredy,
Whatever you think, just remember it’s your fault.
April 26, 2011 at 12:13 PM in reply to: OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side? #689362XBoxBoy
ParticipantI have no idea which one will actually get the nomination, but one things for sure. Whoever does will have to raise buckets of money, and so will be heavily indebted to the bankers, big pharm, and other special interest groups that are raping our country. I pretty much guarantee that whoever runs, and regardless of whoever wins, we’ll still get more of the same crap that passes for governing in this country.
April 26, 2011 at 12:13 PM in reply to: OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side? #689428XBoxBoy
ParticipantI have no idea which one will actually get the nomination, but one things for sure. Whoever does will have to raise buckets of money, and so will be heavily indebted to the bankers, big pharm, and other special interest groups that are raping our country. I pretty much guarantee that whoever runs, and regardless of whoever wins, we’ll still get more of the same crap that passes for governing in this country.
April 26, 2011 at 12:13 PM in reply to: OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side? #690043XBoxBoy
ParticipantI have no idea which one will actually get the nomination, but one things for sure. Whoever does will have to raise buckets of money, and so will be heavily indebted to the bankers, big pharm, and other special interest groups that are raping our country. I pretty much guarantee that whoever runs, and regardless of whoever wins, we’ll still get more of the same crap that passes for governing in this country.
April 26, 2011 at 12:13 PM in reply to: OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side? #690186XBoxBoy
ParticipantI have no idea which one will actually get the nomination, but one things for sure. Whoever does will have to raise buckets of money, and so will be heavily indebted to the bankers, big pharm, and other special interest groups that are raping our country. I pretty much guarantee that whoever runs, and regardless of whoever wins, we’ll still get more of the same crap that passes for governing in this country.
April 26, 2011 at 12:13 PM in reply to: OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side? #690537XBoxBoy
ParticipantI have no idea which one will actually get the nomination, but one things for sure. Whoever does will have to raise buckets of money, and so will be heavily indebted to the bankers, big pharm, and other special interest groups that are raping our country. I pretty much guarantee that whoever runs, and regardless of whoever wins, we’ll still get more of the same crap that passes for governing in this country.
XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=njtosd]All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem.[/quote]
SDLookup does not list them once they are pending. (They do list contingent though. And in case you’re not aware, contingent and pending are different)
[quote=njtosd]And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .[/quote]
There is an option for the realtor to check that signals this listing is NOT to be put on the internet. That could be because the agent prefers to find a buyer and thus get both halves of the commission, or because the agent doesn’t want to hassle with internet shoppers (wanting instead buyers represented by other agents) or because the seller doesn’t want the fact they are selling or the info about the listing to be publicly available. At other times agents don’t list on the mls at all, (so called pocket listings) in hopes that they can get both sides of the deal.
While I agree that it would be in the sellers interest to have the listing out on the internet as soon as possible, I’ve seen/heard lots of things done/said that are not in the seller’s interest by their agents.
XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=njtosd]All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem.[/quote]
SDLookup does not list them once they are pending. (They do list contingent though. And in case you’re not aware, contingent and pending are different)
[quote=njtosd]And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .[/quote]
There is an option for the realtor to check that signals this listing is NOT to be put on the internet. That could be because the agent prefers to find a buyer and thus get both halves of the commission, or because the agent doesn’t want to hassle with internet shoppers (wanting instead buyers represented by other agents) or because the seller doesn’t want the fact they are selling or the info about the listing to be publicly available. At other times agents don’t list on the mls at all, (so called pocket listings) in hopes that they can get both sides of the deal.
While I agree that it would be in the sellers interest to have the listing out on the internet as soon as possible, I’ve seen/heard lots of things done/said that are not in the seller’s interest by their agents.
XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=njtosd]All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem.[/quote]
SDLookup does not list them once they are pending. (They do list contingent though. And in case you’re not aware, contingent and pending are different)
[quote=njtosd]And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .[/quote]
There is an option for the realtor to check that signals this listing is NOT to be put on the internet. That could be because the agent prefers to find a buyer and thus get both halves of the commission, or because the agent doesn’t want to hassle with internet shoppers (wanting instead buyers represented by other agents) or because the seller doesn’t want the fact they are selling or the info about the listing to be publicly available. At other times agents don’t list on the mls at all, (so called pocket listings) in hopes that they can get both sides of the deal.
While I agree that it would be in the sellers interest to have the listing out on the internet as soon as possible, I’ve seen/heard lots of things done/said that are not in the seller’s interest by their agents.
XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=njtosd]All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem.[/quote]
SDLookup does not list them once they are pending. (They do list contingent though. And in case you’re not aware, contingent and pending are different)
[quote=njtosd]And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .[/quote]
There is an option for the realtor to check that signals this listing is NOT to be put on the internet. That could be because the agent prefers to find a buyer and thus get both halves of the commission, or because the agent doesn’t want to hassle with internet shoppers (wanting instead buyers represented by other agents) or because the seller doesn’t want the fact they are selling or the info about the listing to be publicly available. At other times agents don’t list on the mls at all, (so called pocket listings) in hopes that they can get both sides of the deal.
While I agree that it would be in the sellers interest to have the listing out on the internet as soon as possible, I’ve seen/heard lots of things done/said that are not in the seller’s interest by their agents.
XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=njtosd]All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem.[/quote]
SDLookup does not list them once they are pending. (They do list contingent though. And in case you’re not aware, contingent and pending are different)
[quote=njtosd]And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .[/quote]
There is an option for the realtor to check that signals this listing is NOT to be put on the internet. That could be because the agent prefers to find a buyer and thus get both halves of the commission, or because the agent doesn’t want to hassle with internet shoppers (wanting instead buyers represented by other agents) or because the seller doesn’t want the fact they are selling or the info about the listing to be publicly available. At other times agents don’t list on the mls at all, (so called pocket listings) in hopes that they can get both sides of the deal.
While I agree that it would be in the sellers interest to have the listing out on the internet as soon as possible, I’ve seen/heard lots of things done/said that are not in the seller’s interest by their agents.
March 13, 2011 at 10:28 AM in reply to: Recommend any sites to look at open houses in La Jolla? #676563XBoxBoy
ParticipantSecond the suggestion of checking the La Jolla Light and Village News. You have boxes where you can pick them up for free all around the village.
Also, there are lots of open houses on saturdays lately, so drive around a bit on saturday.
March 13, 2011 at 10:28 AM in reply to: Recommend any sites to look at open houses in La Jolla? #677228XBoxBoy
ParticipantSecond the suggestion of checking the La Jolla Light and Village News. You have boxes where you can pick them up for free all around the village.
Also, there are lots of open houses on saturdays lately, so drive around a bit on saturday.
-
AuthorPosts
