Listings? Why aren’t they there?

[moneymaker]

In my neighborhood there are 4 houses for sale within a couple of blocks and at least 3 have been on the market since the beginning of the year. None of them are on SDLOOKUP and only 1 is listed on Redfin. Is there a better site for non realtors to use? I don’t understand why somebody trying to sell their house does not have it listed everywhere on the net.

[sdrealtor]

maybe they are in escrow already. once they go pending most sites take them down

[sdrealtor]

maybe they are in escrow already. once they go pending most sites take them down

[sdrealtor]

maybe they are in escrow already. once they go pending most sites take them down

[sdrealtor]

maybe they are in escrow already. once they go pending most sites take them down

[sdrealtor]

maybe they are in escrow already. once they go pending most sites take them down

[CA renter]

I’ve seen the same thing, although they’ve not been on the market for very long. I think some realtors are keeping them off the MLS so they can get both sides of the commission.

No matter what they are saying in the news, the market is still pretty strong, and if a house is priced right, it will sell within a week. If the seller is “reasonable” about pricing, the agent has very little incentive to put it on the MLS, IMHO.

If I were a seller, I’d light into my realtor like nobody’s business if they did this to my listing, though.

[CA renter]

I’ve seen the same thing, although they’ve not been on the market for very long. I think some realtors are keeping them off the MLS so they can get both sides of the commission.

No matter what they are saying in the news, the market is still pretty strong, and if a house is priced right, it will sell within a week. If the seller is “reasonable” about pricing, the agent has very little incentive to put it on the MLS, IMHO.

If I were a seller, I’d light into my realtor like nobody’s business if they did this to my listing, though.

[CA renter]

I’ve seen the same thing, although they’ve not been on the market for very long. I think some realtors are keeping them off the MLS so they can get both sides of the commission.

No matter what they are saying in the news, the market is still pretty strong, and if a house is priced right, it will sell within a week. If the seller is “reasonable” about pricing, the agent has very little incentive to put it on the MLS, IMHO.

If I were a seller, I’d light into my realtor like nobody’s business if they did this to my listing, though.

[CA renter]

I’ve seen the same thing, although they’ve not been on the market for very long. I think some realtors are keeping them off the MLS so they can get both sides of the commission.

No matter what they are saying in the news, the market is still pretty strong, and if a house is priced right, it will sell within a week. If the seller is “reasonable” about pricing, the agent has very little incentive to put it on the MLS, IMHO.

If I were a seller, I’d light into my realtor like nobody’s business if they did this to my listing, though.

[CA renter]

I’ve seen the same thing, although they’ve not been on the market for very long. I think some realtors are keeping them off the MLS so they can get both sides of the commission.

No matter what they are saying in the news, the market is still pretty strong, and if a house is priced right, it will sell within a week. If the seller is “reasonable” about pricing, the agent has very little incentive to put it on the MLS, IMHO.

If I were a seller, I’d light into my realtor like nobody’s business if they did this to my listing, though.

[njtosd]

All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem. And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .

[njtosd]

All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem. And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .

[njtosd]

All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem. And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .

[njtosd]

All the sites that I checked (Realtor.com, redfin.com, SDLookup.com) still list homes even when they are contingent, so that doesn’t seem to be the problem. And my understanding was that once a house was listed with a realtor, the realtor was required (either by listing agreement, ethical rules or something else) to get it up on the MLS as quickly as possible (assuming that the seller wanted it done that way). In this market, I can’t understand why a seller (or seller’s agent) wouldn’t want the exposure . . .

[Author]

Posts