[Veritas]

“It will cost $2.6 trillion in its first decade of operation and is built on Madoff-style financing. For example, it double counts Social Security payroll taxes, long-term care premiums, and Medicare savings in order to make it appear more fiscally responsible. In reality, ObamaCare isn’t $143 billion in the black, as Democrats have claimed, but $618 billion in the red. And giving the IRS $10 billion to hire about 16,000 agents to enforce the new taxes and fees in ObamaCare will drive small business owners crazy.”

WSJ 3-25-10

Actually, it will not drive them crazy. It will drive them out of business and then there will be fewer workers to feed the Beast!

[Veritas]

“It will cost $2.6 trillion in its first decade of operation and is built on Madoff-style financing. For example, it double counts Social Security payroll taxes, long-term care premiums, and Medicare savings in order to make it appear more fiscally responsible. In reality, ObamaCare isn’t $143 billion in the black, as Democrats have claimed, but $618 billion in the red. And giving the IRS $10 billion to hire about 16,000 agents to enforce the new taxes and fees in ObamaCare will drive small business owners crazy.”

WSJ 3-25-10

Actually, it will not drive them crazy. It will drive them out of business and then there will be fewer workers to feed the Beast!

[Veritas]

“It will cost $2.6 trillion in its first decade of operation and is built on Madoff-style financing. For example, it double counts Social Security payroll taxes, long-term care premiums, and Medicare savings in order to make it appear more fiscally responsible. In reality, ObamaCare isn’t $143 billion in the black, as Democrats have claimed, but $618 billion in the red. And giving the IRS $10 billion to hire about 16,000 agents to enforce the new taxes and fees in ObamaCare will drive small business owners crazy.”

WSJ 3-25-10

Actually, it will not drive them crazy. It will drive them out of business and then there will be fewer workers to feed the Beast!

[Veritas]

“It will cost $2.6 trillion in its first decade of operation and is built on Madoff-style financing. For example, it double counts Social Security payroll taxes, long-term care premiums, and Medicare savings in order to make it appear more fiscally responsible. In reality, ObamaCare isn’t $143 billion in the black, as Democrats have claimed, but $618 billion in the red. And giving the IRS $10 billion to hire about 16,000 agents to enforce the new taxes and fees in ObamaCare will drive small business owners crazy.”

WSJ 3-25-10

Actually, it will not drive them crazy. It will drive them out of business and then there will be fewer workers to feed the Beast!

[Veritas]

“It will cost $2.6 trillion in its first decade of operation and is built on Madoff-style financing. For example, it double counts Social Security payroll taxes, long-term care premiums, and Medicare savings in order to make it appear more fiscally responsible. In reality, ObamaCare isn’t $143 billion in the black, as Democrats have claimed, but $618 billion in the red. And giving the IRS $10 billion to hire about 16,000 agents to enforce the new taxes and fees in ObamaCare will drive small business owners crazy.”

WSJ 3-25-10

Actually, it will not drive them crazy. It will drive them out of business and then there will be fewer workers to feed the Beast!

[Veritas]

“Obama made better coverage for children a centerpiece of his health care remake, but it turns out the letter of the law provided a less-than-complete guarantee that kids with health problems would not be shut out of coverage. Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill Obama signed into law Tuesday.”

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1

[Veritas]

“Obama made better coverage for children a centerpiece of his health care remake, but it turns out the letter of the law provided a less-than-complete guarantee that kids with health problems would not be shut out of coverage. Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill Obama signed into law Tuesday.”

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1

[Veritas]

“Obama made better coverage for children a centerpiece of his health care remake, but it turns out the letter of the law provided a less-than-complete guarantee that kids with health problems would not be shut out of coverage. Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill Obama signed into law Tuesday.”

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1

[Veritas]

“Obama made better coverage for children a centerpiece of his health care remake, but it turns out the letter of the law provided a less-than-complete guarantee that kids with health problems would not be shut out of coverage. Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill Obama signed into law Tuesday.”

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1

[Veritas]

“Obama made better coverage for children a centerpiece of his health care remake, but it turns out the letter of the law provided a less-than-complete guarantee that kids with health problems would not be shut out of coverage. Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill Obama signed into law Tuesday.”

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1

[Veritas]

Aren’t you glad you have a home already? I feel sorry for those who played by the rules and are saving up to by a home at reduced rates. This stuff is sickening to someone who did not use their house for an ATM. It is just another attempt to prop up the faltering economy at the expense of the taxpayers and no I was not for any of the bank bailouts, for the record.

[Veritas]

Aren’t you glad you have a home already? I feel sorry for those who played by the rules and are saving up to by a home at reduced rates. This stuff is sickening to someone who did not use their house for an ATM. It is just another attempt to prop up the faltering economy at the expense of the taxpayers and no I was not for any of the bank bailouts, for the record.

[Veritas]

Aren’t you glad you have a home already? I feel sorry for those who played by the rules and are saving up to by a home at reduced rates. This stuff is sickening to someone who did not use their house for an ATM. It is just another attempt to prop up the faltering economy at the expense of the taxpayers and no I was not for any of the bank bailouts, for the record.

[Veritas]

Aren’t you glad you have a home already? I feel sorry for those who played by the rules and are saving up to by a home at reduced rates. This stuff is sickening to someone who did not use their house for an ATM. It is just another attempt to prop up the faltering economy at the expense of the taxpayers and no I was not for any of the bank bailouts, for the record.

[Veritas]

Aren’t you glad you have a home already? I feel sorry for those who played by the rules and are saving up to by a home at reduced rates. This stuff is sickening to someone who did not use their house for an ATM. It is just another attempt to prop up the faltering economy at the expense of the taxpayers and no I was not for any of the bank bailouts, for the record.

[Author]

Posts