[Veritas]

John,
You can smell their fear. The hysterical attacks will continue. I know you do not like Hillary, but she was more qualified than BO is. What they are most angry about is they had an unbeatable ticket and yet they picked Biden. I find this election to be much more entertaining than the last. Do you think the meeting with Clinton was to see if Hillary would consider replacing Biden or ?

[Veritas]

John,
You can smell their fear. The hysterical attacks will continue. I know you do not like Hillary, but she was more qualified than BO is. What they are most angry about is they had an unbeatable ticket and yet they picked Biden. I find this election to be much more entertaining than the last. Do you think the meeting with Clinton was to see if Hillary would consider replacing Biden or ?

[Veritas]

John,
You can smell their fear. The hysterical attacks will continue. I know you do not like Hillary, but she was more qualified than BO is. What they are most angry about is they had an unbeatable ticket and yet they picked Biden. I find this election to be much more entertaining than the last. Do you think the meeting with Clinton was to see if Hillary would consider replacing Biden or ?

[Veritas]

John,
You can smell their fear. The hysterical attacks will continue. I know you do not like Hillary, but she was more qualified than BO is. What they are most angry about is they had an unbeatable ticket and yet they picked Biden. I find this election to be much more entertaining than the last. Do you think the meeting with Clinton was to see if Hillary would consider replacing Biden or ?

[Veritas]

John,
You can smell their fear. The hysterical attacks will continue. I know you do not like Hillary, but she was more qualified than BO is. What they are most angry about is they had an unbeatable ticket and yet they picked Biden. I find this election to be much more entertaining than the last. Do you think the meeting with Clinton was to see if Hillary would consider replacing Biden or ?

[Veritas]

Charlie Gibson’s Attempt to Twist Sarah Palin’s Words
By John Stephenson (Bio | Archive)
September 11, 2008 – 21:03 ET

Hubris was indeed revealed in the ABC interview with Sarah Palin, and it wasn’t coming from Sarah Palin, but Charlie Gibson. But there was more than Charlie’s sneering condescending tone, looking down over the rim of his glasses like some snobby intellectual that bothered me. Twisting her words into a fabrication feeding the fear of theocracy was utterly insulting. It was especially insulting to claim that these were her “exact words” after being challenged on it. Watch this video excerpt from the interview to see the exchange.

Here is the transcript of the exchange:

GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?

PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.

GIBSON: Exact words.

PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie.

GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”

Actually, Charlie, that is totally untrue. Here is what she actually said:

“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”

Here is a tip for the future Charlie. Try not to rely on the AP for your “exact quotes”. It makes you look like a total fool, especially after condescendingly insisting you are correct.

[Veritas]

Charlie Gibson’s Attempt to Twist Sarah Palin’s Words
By John Stephenson (Bio | Archive)
September 11, 2008 – 21:03 ET

Hubris was indeed revealed in the ABC interview with Sarah Palin, and it wasn’t coming from Sarah Palin, but Charlie Gibson. But there was more than Charlie’s sneering condescending tone, looking down over the rim of his glasses like some snobby intellectual that bothered me. Twisting her words into a fabrication feeding the fear of theocracy was utterly insulting. It was especially insulting to claim that these were her “exact words” after being challenged on it. Watch this video excerpt from the interview to see the exchange.

Here is the transcript of the exchange:

GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?

PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.

GIBSON: Exact words.

PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie.

GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”

Actually, Charlie, that is totally untrue. Here is what she actually said:

“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”

Here is a tip for the future Charlie. Try not to rely on the AP for your “exact quotes”. It makes you look like a total fool, especially after condescendingly insisting you are correct.

[Veritas]

Charlie Gibson’s Attempt to Twist Sarah Palin’s Words
By John Stephenson (Bio | Archive)
September 11, 2008 – 21:03 ET

Hubris was indeed revealed in the ABC interview with Sarah Palin, and it wasn’t coming from Sarah Palin, but Charlie Gibson. But there was more than Charlie’s sneering condescending tone, looking down over the rim of his glasses like some snobby intellectual that bothered me. Twisting her words into a fabrication feeding the fear of theocracy was utterly insulting. It was especially insulting to claim that these were her “exact words” after being challenged on it. Watch this video excerpt from the interview to see the exchange.

Here is the transcript of the exchange:

GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?

PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.

GIBSON: Exact words.

PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie.

GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”

Actually, Charlie, that is totally untrue. Here is what she actually said:

“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”

Here is a tip for the future Charlie. Try not to rely on the AP for your “exact quotes”. It makes you look like a total fool, especially after condescendingly insisting you are correct.

[Veritas]

Charlie Gibson’s Attempt to Twist Sarah Palin’s Words
By John Stephenson (Bio | Archive)
September 11, 2008 – 21:03 ET

Hubris was indeed revealed in the ABC interview with Sarah Palin, and it wasn’t coming from Sarah Palin, but Charlie Gibson. But there was more than Charlie’s sneering condescending tone, looking down over the rim of his glasses like some snobby intellectual that bothered me. Twisting her words into a fabrication feeding the fear of theocracy was utterly insulting. It was especially insulting to claim that these were her “exact words” after being challenged on it. Watch this video excerpt from the interview to see the exchange.

Here is the transcript of the exchange:

GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?

PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.

GIBSON: Exact words.

PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie.

GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”

Actually, Charlie, that is totally untrue. Here is what she actually said:

“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”

Here is a tip for the future Charlie. Try not to rely on the AP for your “exact quotes”. It makes you look like a total fool, especially after condescendingly insisting you are correct.

[Veritas]

Charlie Gibson’s Attempt to Twist Sarah Palin’s Words
By John Stephenson (Bio | Archive)
September 11, 2008 – 21:03 ET

Hubris was indeed revealed in the ABC interview with Sarah Palin, and it wasn’t coming from Sarah Palin, but Charlie Gibson. But there was more than Charlie’s sneering condescending tone, looking down over the rim of his glasses like some snobby intellectual that bothered me. Twisting her words into a fabrication feeding the fear of theocracy was utterly insulting. It was especially insulting to claim that these were her “exact words” after being challenged on it. Watch this video excerpt from the interview to see the exchange.

Here is the transcript of the exchange:

GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?

PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.

GIBSON: Exact words.

PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie.

GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”

Actually, Charlie, that is totally untrue. Here is what she actually said:

“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”

Here is a tip for the future Charlie. Try not to rely on the AP for your “exact quotes”. It makes you look like a total fool, especially after condescendingly insisting you are correct.

[Veritas]

Have you looked at the area(s) where you would need to rent yet? That might be a factor influencing your decision to sell. I lean more toward the buy and hold side of the equation, but I don’t think we are at or even near the bottom. Selling now might be the best depending on the market conditions. I think the sellers see a looming crash in the economy(not just a deflating real estate bubble) and prices going even lower. Have you decided where you are going to park your money? That is also something to consider. Good luck.

[Veritas]

Have you looked at the area(s) where you would need to rent yet? That might be a factor influencing your decision to sell. I lean more toward the buy and hold side of the equation, but I don’t think we are at or even near the bottom. Selling now might be the best depending on the market conditions. I think the sellers see a looming crash in the economy(not just a deflating real estate bubble) and prices going even lower. Have you decided where you are going to park your money? That is also something to consider. Good luck.

[Veritas]

Have you looked at the area(s) where you would need to rent yet? That might be a factor influencing your decision to sell. I lean more toward the buy and hold side of the equation, but I don’t think we are at or even near the bottom. Selling now might be the best depending on the market conditions. I think the sellers see a looming crash in the economy(not just a deflating real estate bubble) and prices going even lower. Have you decided where you are going to park your money? That is also something to consider. Good luck.

[Veritas]

Have you looked at the area(s) where you would need to rent yet? That might be a factor influencing your decision to sell. I lean more toward the buy and hold side of the equation, but I don’t think we are at or even near the bottom. Selling now might be the best depending on the market conditions. I think the sellers see a looming crash in the economy(not just a deflating real estate bubble) and prices going even lower. Have you decided where you are going to park your money? That is also something to consider. Good luck.

[Veritas]

Have you looked at the area(s) where you would need to rent yet? That might be a factor influencing your decision to sell. I lean more toward the buy and hold side of the equation, but I don’t think we are at or even near the bottom. Selling now might be the best depending on the market conditions. I think the sellers see a looming crash in the economy(not just a deflating real estate bubble) and prices going even lower. Have you decided where you are going to park your money? That is also something to consider. Good luck.

[Author]

Posts