[ucodegen]

Yea, but did you watch the second video? The analyst states the stock has the potential to fall to $28, based on the technical chart, especially if the fundamentals (earnings) don’t turn around quickly!

I tend to ignore analysts who have to get camera time. Answer this: Who is generally considered one of the best stock pickers out there? How many times has this person searched out ‘camera time’ or ‘face time’ in the media? Does this person publish their picks or try to have them concealed?

BTW, did you watch just the videos or did you look through the quarterly and annual reports?

[ucodegen]

Yea, but did you watch the second video? The analyst states the stock has the potential to fall to $28, based on the technical chart, especially if the fundamentals (earnings) don’t turn around quickly!

I tend to ignore analysts who have to get camera time. Answer this: Who is generally considered one of the best stock pickers out there? How many times has this person searched out ‘camera time’ or ‘face time’ in the media? Does this person publish their picks or try to have them concealed?

BTW, did you watch just the videos or did you look through the quarterly and annual reports?

[ucodegen]

Yea, but did you watch the second video? The analyst states the stock has the potential to fall to $28, based on the technical chart, especially if the fundamentals (earnings) don’t turn around quickly!

I tend to ignore analysts who have to get camera time. Answer this: Who is generally considered one of the best stock pickers out there? How many times has this person searched out ‘camera time’ or ‘face time’ in the media? Does this person publish their picks or try to have them concealed?

BTW, did you watch just the videos or did you look through the quarterly and annual reports?

[ucodegen]

There is a new-old game in the stock market. The whole point is to get the stock moving up and down, with people jumping in and out of the stock. This way, the brokers and market makers make money. Bash a stock bad to the press or create ‘leaks’ of information, let the stock take a large hit and then buy in after 30 or more days of it being low. Too many people don’t do their DD and just jump when some news pundit opens their mouth.

Remember that Jim Cramer stated that there was no real problem in the housing market before it really tanked. It was only after the banks started having real problems that he said anything. Also remember that Jim Cramer admitted to using the above mentioned method when he was in his hedge-fund days.

Cramer also said in 2/19/2010 that QCOM might be forming a technical bottom (2nd page):
http://www.thestreet.com/story/10685068/2/jim-cramers-portfolios-of-the-week.html

[ucodegen]

There is a new-old game in the stock market. The whole point is to get the stock moving up and down, with people jumping in and out of the stock. This way, the brokers and market makers make money. Bash a stock bad to the press or create ‘leaks’ of information, let the stock take a large hit and then buy in after 30 or more days of it being low. Too many people don’t do their DD and just jump when some news pundit opens their mouth.

Remember that Jim Cramer stated that there was no real problem in the housing market before it really tanked. It was only after the banks started having real problems that he said anything. Also remember that Jim Cramer admitted to using the above mentioned method when he was in his hedge-fund days.

Cramer also said in 2/19/2010 that QCOM might be forming a technical bottom (2nd page):
http://www.thestreet.com/story/10685068/2/jim-cramers-portfolios-of-the-week.html

[ucodegen]

There is a new-old game in the stock market. The whole point is to get the stock moving up and down, with people jumping in and out of the stock. This way, the brokers and market makers make money. Bash a stock bad to the press or create ‘leaks’ of information, let the stock take a large hit and then buy in after 30 or more days of it being low. Too many people don’t do their DD and just jump when some news pundit opens their mouth.

Remember that Jim Cramer stated that there was no real problem in the housing market before it really tanked. It was only after the banks started having real problems that he said anything. Also remember that Jim Cramer admitted to using the above mentioned method when he was in his hedge-fund days.

Cramer also said in 2/19/2010 that QCOM might be forming a technical bottom (2nd page):
http://www.thestreet.com/story/10685068/2/jim-cramers-portfolios-of-the-week.html

[ucodegen]

There is a new-old game in the stock market. The whole point is to get the stock moving up and down, with people jumping in and out of the stock. This way, the brokers and market makers make money. Bash a stock bad to the press or create ‘leaks’ of information, let the stock take a large hit and then buy in after 30 or more days of it being low. Too many people don’t do their DD and just jump when some news pundit opens their mouth.

Remember that Jim Cramer stated that there was no real problem in the housing market before it really tanked. It was only after the banks started having real problems that he said anything. Also remember that Jim Cramer admitted to using the above mentioned method when he was in his hedge-fund days.

Cramer also said in 2/19/2010 that QCOM might be forming a technical bottom (2nd page):
http://www.thestreet.com/story/10685068/2/jim-cramers-portfolios-of-the-week.html

[ucodegen]

There is a new-old game in the stock market. The whole point is to get the stock moving up and down, with people jumping in and out of the stock. This way, the brokers and market makers make money. Bash a stock bad to the press or create ‘leaks’ of information, let the stock take a large hit and then buy in after 30 or more days of it being low. Too many people don’t do their DD and just jump when some news pundit opens their mouth.

Remember that Jim Cramer stated that there was no real problem in the housing market before it really tanked. It was only after the banks started having real problems that he said anything. Also remember that Jim Cramer admitted to using the above mentioned method when he was in his hedge-fund days.

Cramer also said in 2/19/2010 that QCOM might be forming a technical bottom (2nd page):
http://www.thestreet.com/story/10685068/2/jim-cramers-portfolios-of-the-week.html

[ucodegen]

I’ve owned a couple of Sigs in my time, but there’s something about a .45 with a 13+1 capacity that just warms the cockles of my evil little heart. Especially when those 14 rounds are 230gr Hydra-Shoks.

What about a .357 SIG for a concealable. The goal on this design was to equal the performace of a 125gr .357 Magnum load. Muzzle vel of the SIG is about 1450fps on a 4 inch barrel, 792Joules energy (highest I have seen for a .45ACP is about 700Joules).

Only problem with the 357SIG is the muzzle flash and noise. The 45 ACP makes a good ‘silenced’ device, hard to do that with the 357SIG

PS: The .357SIG is supposedly standard issue for special agents of the Secret Service. Scary part is that is it also standard issue for the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (I guess they really want the money!)

For a .45 ACP, look at CorBon JHP. Lighter bullet, higher velocity. Penetration is less within human target while delivering almost 50% more shock energy than a HydraShok.

Some tests with .45ACP and .357SIG
http://intrencik.com/357sig.htm

[ucodegen]

I’ve owned a couple of Sigs in my time, but there’s something about a .45 with a 13+1 capacity that just warms the cockles of my evil little heart. Especially when those 14 rounds are 230gr Hydra-Shoks.

What about a .357 SIG for a concealable. The goal on this design was to equal the performace of a 125gr .357 Magnum load. Muzzle vel of the SIG is about 1450fps on a 4 inch barrel, 792Joules energy (highest I have seen for a .45ACP is about 700Joules).

Only problem with the 357SIG is the muzzle flash and noise. The 45 ACP makes a good ‘silenced’ device, hard to do that with the 357SIG

PS: The .357SIG is supposedly standard issue for special agents of the Secret Service. Scary part is that is it also standard issue for the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (I guess they really want the money!)

For a .45 ACP, look at CorBon JHP. Lighter bullet, higher velocity. Penetration is less within human target while delivering almost 50% more shock energy than a HydraShok.

Some tests with .45ACP and .357SIG
http://intrencik.com/357sig.htm

[ucodegen]

I’ve owned a couple of Sigs in my time, but there’s something about a .45 with a 13+1 capacity that just warms the cockles of my evil little heart. Especially when those 14 rounds are 230gr Hydra-Shoks.

What about a .357 SIG for a concealable. The goal on this design was to equal the performace of a 125gr .357 Magnum load. Muzzle vel of the SIG is about 1450fps on a 4 inch barrel, 792Joules energy (highest I have seen for a .45ACP is about 700Joules).

Only problem with the 357SIG is the muzzle flash and noise. The 45 ACP makes a good ‘silenced’ device, hard to do that with the 357SIG

PS: The .357SIG is supposedly standard issue for special agents of the Secret Service. Scary part is that is it also standard issue for the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (I guess they really want the money!)

For a .45 ACP, look at CorBon JHP. Lighter bullet, higher velocity. Penetration is less within human target while delivering almost 50% more shock energy than a HydraShok.

Some tests with .45ACP and .357SIG
http://intrencik.com/357sig.htm

[ucodegen]

I’ve owned a couple of Sigs in my time, but there’s something about a .45 with a 13+1 capacity that just warms the cockles of my evil little heart. Especially when those 14 rounds are 230gr Hydra-Shoks.

What about a .357 SIG for a concealable. The goal on this design was to equal the performace of a 125gr .357 Magnum load. Muzzle vel of the SIG is about 1450fps on a 4 inch barrel, 792Joules energy (highest I have seen for a .45ACP is about 700Joules).

Only problem with the 357SIG is the muzzle flash and noise. The 45 ACP makes a good ‘silenced’ device, hard to do that with the 357SIG

PS: The .357SIG is supposedly standard issue for special agents of the Secret Service. Scary part is that is it also standard issue for the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (I guess they really want the money!)

For a .45 ACP, look at CorBon JHP. Lighter bullet, higher velocity. Penetration is less within human target while delivering almost 50% more shock energy than a HydraShok.

Some tests with .45ACP and .357SIG
http://intrencik.com/357sig.htm

[ucodegen]

I’ve owned a couple of Sigs in my time, but there’s something about a .45 with a 13+1 capacity that just warms the cockles of my evil little heart. Especially when those 14 rounds are 230gr Hydra-Shoks.

What about a .357 SIG for a concealable. The goal on this design was to equal the performace of a 125gr .357 Magnum load. Muzzle vel of the SIG is about 1450fps on a 4 inch barrel, 792Joules energy (highest I have seen for a .45ACP is about 700Joules).

Only problem with the 357SIG is the muzzle flash and noise. The 45 ACP makes a good ‘silenced’ device, hard to do that with the 357SIG

PS: The .357SIG is supposedly standard issue for special agents of the Secret Service. Scary part is that is it also standard issue for the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (I guess they really want the money!)

For a .45 ACP, look at CorBon JHP. Lighter bullet, higher velocity. Penetration is less within human target while delivering almost 50% more shock energy than a HydraShok.

Some tests with .45ACP and .357SIG
http://intrencik.com/357sig.htm

[ucodegen]

These should do the trick:

First one is the M2 Browning (50 cal BMG) that I mentioned, 17,149 joules of projectile energy. Fires full auto or single shot by paddle triggers(by the thumbs). From what I remember, what used to be the longest recorded kill was done with one of these.

Second one looks like 3 M134 Dillons. The feed chains look too wide to be a XM214. This fires 7.62 rounds at up to 3,900 rounds per minute.. each.

[ucodegen]

These should do the trick:

First one is the M2 Browning (50 cal BMG) that I mentioned, 17,149 joules of projectile energy. Fires full auto or single shot by paddle triggers(by the thumbs). From what I remember, what used to be the longest recorded kill was done with one of these.

Second one looks like 3 M134 Dillons. The feed chains look too wide to be a XM214. This fires 7.62 rounds at up to 3,900 rounds per minute.. each.

[Author]

Posts