Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 14, 2008 at 3:48 PM in reply to: Lehman Bailout this Weekend (Bear Stearns replay) #270104September 14, 2008 at 3:48 PM in reply to: Lehman Bailout this Weekend (Bear Stearns replay) #270339
TheBreeze
ParticipantWow! It looks like we got our wish — the government has pulled back from all the bailouts. It should be interesting to see how this plays out. The DOW futures are already down about -300:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15839171/site/14081545/
I can’t say I’m not worried. I hope all the Piggs are able to keep their current jobs or quickly find a new one should they find their current position on the chopping block. We all knew this was going to happen, but it’s a little disconcerting having to actually go through it.
September 14, 2008 at 3:48 PM in reply to: Lehman Bailout this Weekend (Bear Stearns replay) #270343TheBreeze
ParticipantWow! It looks like we got our wish — the government has pulled back from all the bailouts. It should be interesting to see how this plays out. The DOW futures are already down about -300:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15839171/site/14081545/
I can’t say I’m not worried. I hope all the Piggs are able to keep their current jobs or quickly find a new one should they find their current position on the chopping block. We all knew this was going to happen, but it’s a little disconcerting having to actually go through it.
September 14, 2008 at 3:48 PM in reply to: Lehman Bailout this Weekend (Bear Stearns replay) #270392TheBreeze
ParticipantWow! It looks like we got our wish — the government has pulled back from all the bailouts. It should be interesting to see how this plays out. The DOW futures are already down about -300:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15839171/site/14081545/
I can’t say I’m not worried. I hope all the Piggs are able to keep their current jobs or quickly find a new one should they find their current position on the chopping block. We all knew this was going to happen, but it’s a little disconcerting having to actually go through it.
September 14, 2008 at 3:48 PM in reply to: Lehman Bailout this Weekend (Bear Stearns replay) #270419TheBreeze
ParticipantWow! It looks like we got our wish — the government has pulled back from all the bailouts. It should be interesting to see how this plays out. The DOW futures are already down about -300:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15839171/site/14081545/
I can’t say I’m not worried. I hope all the Piggs are able to keep their current jobs or quickly find a new one should they find their current position on the chopping block. We all knew this was going to happen, but it’s a little disconcerting having to actually go through it.
TheBreeze
ParticipantA few things:
one – Although everyone one Piggington makes home-buying decisions based on the actual price of a home, what percentage of peeps in the real world do you think do that?
My guess is that 50% of people will buy a house if they can find a bank that will give them a loan. They don’t consider price or even whether they can afford the monthly nut from the get go. Another 25% only consider whether they can afford the monthly payment (the actual price of the home means squat to them). Another 10% or so will buy a house if they can afford a fixed monthly payment after putting 10 to 20% down. The remaining 15% actually consider the price of the home itself.
So this notion that there are bunch of people on the sidelines waiting for a certain price is probably crapola. Although, there are certainly some investors out there who can purchase several properties.
two – Supposedly the main factor in the models used by the ratings agencies was employment. If everyone stayed employed, the models predicted blissful homeownership for eternity. Affordability and the like was either a small factor or a non-factor in the models. The models were likely structured to give good ratings, not to give accurate ratings.
three – How can we be in an inflationary environment if gold is going down every day?
TheBreeze
ParticipantA few things:
one – Although everyone one Piggington makes home-buying decisions based on the actual price of a home, what percentage of peeps in the real world do you think do that?
My guess is that 50% of people will buy a house if they can find a bank that will give them a loan. They don’t consider price or even whether they can afford the monthly nut from the get go. Another 25% only consider whether they can afford the monthly payment (the actual price of the home means squat to them). Another 10% or so will buy a house if they can afford a fixed monthly payment after putting 10 to 20% down. The remaining 15% actually consider the price of the home itself.
So this notion that there are bunch of people on the sidelines waiting for a certain price is probably crapola. Although, there are certainly some investors out there who can purchase several properties.
two – Supposedly the main factor in the models used by the ratings agencies was employment. If everyone stayed employed, the models predicted blissful homeownership for eternity. Affordability and the like was either a small factor or a non-factor in the models. The models were likely structured to give good ratings, not to give accurate ratings.
three – How can we be in an inflationary environment if gold is going down every day?
TheBreeze
ParticipantA few things:
one – Although everyone one Piggington makes home-buying decisions based on the actual price of a home, what percentage of peeps in the real world do you think do that?
My guess is that 50% of people will buy a house if they can find a bank that will give them a loan. They don’t consider price or even whether they can afford the monthly nut from the get go. Another 25% only consider whether they can afford the monthly payment (the actual price of the home means squat to them). Another 10% or so will buy a house if they can afford a fixed monthly payment after putting 10 to 20% down. The remaining 15% actually consider the price of the home itself.
So this notion that there are bunch of people on the sidelines waiting for a certain price is probably crapola. Although, there are certainly some investors out there who can purchase several properties.
two – Supposedly the main factor in the models used by the ratings agencies was employment. If everyone stayed employed, the models predicted blissful homeownership for eternity. Affordability and the like was either a small factor or a non-factor in the models. The models were likely structured to give good ratings, not to give accurate ratings.
three – How can we be in an inflationary environment if gold is going down every day?
TheBreeze
ParticipantA few things:
one – Although everyone one Piggington makes home-buying decisions based on the actual price of a home, what percentage of peeps in the real world do you think do that?
My guess is that 50% of people will buy a house if they can find a bank that will give them a loan. They don’t consider price or even whether they can afford the monthly nut from the get go. Another 25% only consider whether they can afford the monthly payment (the actual price of the home means squat to them). Another 10% or so will buy a house if they can afford a fixed monthly payment after putting 10 to 20% down. The remaining 15% actually consider the price of the home itself.
So this notion that there are bunch of people on the sidelines waiting for a certain price is probably crapola. Although, there are certainly some investors out there who can purchase several properties.
two – Supposedly the main factor in the models used by the ratings agencies was employment. If everyone stayed employed, the models predicted blissful homeownership for eternity. Affordability and the like was either a small factor or a non-factor in the models. The models were likely structured to give good ratings, not to give accurate ratings.
three – How can we be in an inflationary environment if gold is going down every day?
TheBreeze
ParticipantA few things:
one – Although everyone one Piggington makes home-buying decisions based on the actual price of a home, what percentage of peeps in the real world do you think do that?
My guess is that 50% of people will buy a house if they can find a bank that will give them a loan. They don’t consider price or even whether they can afford the monthly nut from the get go. Another 25% only consider whether they can afford the monthly payment (the actual price of the home means squat to them). Another 10% or so will buy a house if they can afford a fixed monthly payment after putting 10 to 20% down. The remaining 15% actually consider the price of the home itself.
So this notion that there are bunch of people on the sidelines waiting for a certain price is probably crapola. Although, there are certainly some investors out there who can purchase several properties.
two – Supposedly the main factor in the models used by the ratings agencies was employment. If everyone stayed employed, the models predicted blissful homeownership for eternity. Affordability and the like was either a small factor or a non-factor in the models. The models were likely structured to give good ratings, not to give accurate ratings.
three – How can we be in an inflationary environment if gold is going down every day?
TheBreeze
Participant[quote=condogrrl]Obama will be our first affirmative action president. The less qualified candidate is promoted to president because of his color. No wonder people don’t want to entrust the country to him. Would you want an affirmative action doctor to operate on you? Would you even want an affirmative action mechanic to work on your car? No, I want a truly qualified person. Obama’s credentials are weaker than mine. And I’m not so arrogant to think that I could run this country successfully.[/quote]
How do you think Bush got into Yale? Based on merit? White dudes have had their own form of affirmative action for a long time. Obama was editor of Harvard Law Review. Bush can’t string 3 coherent words together. I think Obama has earned his place.
TheBreeze
Participant[quote=condogrrl]Obama will be our first affirmative action president. The less qualified candidate is promoted to president because of his color. No wonder people don’t want to entrust the country to him. Would you want an affirmative action doctor to operate on you? Would you even want an affirmative action mechanic to work on your car? No, I want a truly qualified person. Obama’s credentials are weaker than mine. And I’m not so arrogant to think that I could run this country successfully.[/quote]
How do you think Bush got into Yale? Based on merit? White dudes have had their own form of affirmative action for a long time. Obama was editor of Harvard Law Review. Bush can’t string 3 coherent words together. I think Obama has earned his place.
TheBreeze
Participant[quote=condogrrl]Obama will be our first affirmative action president. The less qualified candidate is promoted to president because of his color. No wonder people don’t want to entrust the country to him. Would you want an affirmative action doctor to operate on you? Would you even want an affirmative action mechanic to work on your car? No, I want a truly qualified person. Obama’s credentials are weaker than mine. And I’m not so arrogant to think that I could run this country successfully.[/quote]
How do you think Bush got into Yale? Based on merit? White dudes have had their own form of affirmative action for a long time. Obama was editor of Harvard Law Review. Bush can’t string 3 coherent words together. I think Obama has earned his place.
TheBreeze
Participant[quote=condogrrl]Obama will be our first affirmative action president. The less qualified candidate is promoted to president because of his color. No wonder people don’t want to entrust the country to him. Would you want an affirmative action doctor to operate on you? Would you even want an affirmative action mechanic to work on your car? No, I want a truly qualified person. Obama’s credentials are weaker than mine. And I’m not so arrogant to think that I could run this country successfully.[/quote]
How do you think Bush got into Yale? Based on merit? White dudes have had their own form of affirmative action for a long time. Obama was editor of Harvard Law Review. Bush can’t string 3 coherent words together. I think Obama has earned his place.
TheBreeze
Participant[quote=condogrrl]Obama will be our first affirmative action president. The less qualified candidate is promoted to president because of his color. No wonder people don’t want to entrust the country to him. Would you want an affirmative action doctor to operate on you? Would you even want an affirmative action mechanic to work on your car? No, I want a truly qualified person. Obama’s credentials are weaker than mine. And I’m not so arrogant to think that I could run this country successfully.[/quote]
How do you think Bush got into Yale? Based on merit? White dudes have had their own form of affirmative action for a long time. Obama was editor of Harvard Law Review. Bush can’t string 3 coherent words together. I think Obama has earned his place.
-
AuthorPosts
