- This topic has 285 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 24, 2008 at 9:52 PM #13412July 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #246556RaybyrnesParticipant
When publications made real esate sexy it wasn’t too long before it started to implode.
Now they are saying nothing but doomsday predictions. Probably a good time to start looking around. Cash flow positive is probably 6 to 12 months out depneding on where you look. You are still going to need an eye for value and good negotiating skills.
July 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #246706RaybyrnesParticipantWhen publications made real esate sexy it wasn’t too long before it started to implode.
Now they are saying nothing but doomsday predictions. Probably a good time to start looking around. Cash flow positive is probably 6 to 12 months out depneding on where you look. You are still going to need an eye for value and good negotiating skills.
July 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #246713RaybyrnesParticipantWhen publications made real esate sexy it wasn’t too long before it started to implode.
Now they are saying nothing but doomsday predictions. Probably a good time to start looking around. Cash flow positive is probably 6 to 12 months out depneding on where you look. You are still going to need an eye for value and good negotiating skills.
July 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #246769RaybyrnesParticipantWhen publications made real esate sexy it wasn’t too long before it started to implode.
Now they are saying nothing but doomsday predictions. Probably a good time to start looking around. Cash flow positive is probably 6 to 12 months out depneding on where you look. You are still going to need an eye for value and good negotiating skills.
July 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #246775RaybyrnesParticipantWhen publications made real esate sexy it wasn’t too long before it started to implode.
Now they are saying nothing but doomsday predictions. Probably a good time to start looking around. Cash flow positive is probably 6 to 12 months out depneding on where you look. You are still going to need an eye for value and good negotiating skills.
July 24, 2008 at 11:55 PM #246637gandalfParticipantNaw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…
July 24, 2008 at 11:55 PM #246787gandalfParticipantNaw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…
July 24, 2008 at 11:55 PM #246793gandalfParticipantNaw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…
July 24, 2008 at 11:55 PM #246851gandalfParticipantNaw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…
July 24, 2008 at 11:55 PM #246855gandalfParticipantNaw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…
July 25, 2008 at 6:44 AM #246722EconProfParticipantFitch, along with Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s, are the three major bond ratings agencies. Fitch has long been more pessimistic, and thus more accurate, than the other two.
I notice in their report that while they predict a continuing melt-down in prices for CA cities like SD and San Francisco, they predict the opposite for Texas cities like San Antonio, a theme I’ve advocated here before.July 25, 2008 at 6:44 AM #246872EconProfParticipantFitch, along with Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s, are the three major bond ratings agencies. Fitch has long been more pessimistic, and thus more accurate, than the other two.
I notice in their report that while they predict a continuing melt-down in prices for CA cities like SD and San Francisco, they predict the opposite for Texas cities like San Antonio, a theme I’ve advocated here before.July 25, 2008 at 6:44 AM #246878EconProfParticipantFitch, along with Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s, are the three major bond ratings agencies. Fitch has long been more pessimistic, and thus more accurate, than the other two.
I notice in their report that while they predict a continuing melt-down in prices for CA cities like SD and San Francisco, they predict the opposite for Texas cities like San Antonio, a theme I’ve advocated here before.July 25, 2008 at 6:44 AM #246936EconProfParticipantFitch, along with Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s, are the three major bond ratings agencies. Fitch has long been more pessimistic, and thus more accurate, than the other two.
I notice in their report that while they predict a continuing melt-down in prices for CA cities like SD and San Francisco, they predict the opposite for Texas cities like San Antonio, a theme I’ve advocated here before. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.