Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
temeculaguy
ParticipantNew is my vote but right now in your market marion, the builders are behind the repos as far as pricing goes, this may change. Rustico made some valid points, older homes are inefficient, poorly insulated, unfinished (no drywall) garages, low tech windows, some have galvanized steel pipes. Houses built after about 1998 in Temecula are a safer bet, avoid 1992-1997 builts in this area, absolute crap, there was no profit margin and corners were cut. Houses, like wines, have a vintage and each year is different. With a repo you will likely have similar expenses because flooring and landscaping needs replacement, with resale houses you’ll pay too much. I’m not nuts about wolf but it was an example you used, the builders are 50-100k over repos in their own tracts, this is going to hurt them and they will have to come down, all of wolf is upside down so the pressure will be there. Redhawk is older but the construction years vary, there is one tract still under construction on the last piece of premium land (hemmingway) and yesterday a repo came on the market for 329k, about 100k lower than new and it was dialed in as far as options go, probably lived in for a month, they are only on about the 30th house and the first ones are going under, they can’t keep that up much longer, on the other side of this bounce, look for 20% slashings at the builders.
temeculaguy
ParticipantNew is my vote but right now in your market marion, the builders are behind the repos as far as pricing goes, this may change. Rustico made some valid points, older homes are inefficient, poorly insulated, unfinished (no drywall) garages, low tech windows, some have galvanized steel pipes. Houses built after about 1998 in Temecula are a safer bet, avoid 1992-1997 builts in this area, absolute crap, there was no profit margin and corners were cut. Houses, like wines, have a vintage and each year is different. With a repo you will likely have similar expenses because flooring and landscaping needs replacement, with resale houses you’ll pay too much. I’m not nuts about wolf but it was an example you used, the builders are 50-100k over repos in their own tracts, this is going to hurt them and they will have to come down, all of wolf is upside down so the pressure will be there. Redhawk is older but the construction years vary, there is one tract still under construction on the last piece of premium land (hemmingway) and yesterday a repo came on the market for 329k, about 100k lower than new and it was dialed in as far as options go, probably lived in for a month, they are only on about the 30th house and the first ones are going under, they can’t keep that up much longer, on the other side of this bounce, look for 20% slashings at the builders.
temeculaguy
ParticipantNew is my vote but right now in your market marion, the builders are behind the repos as far as pricing goes, this may change. Rustico made some valid points, older homes are inefficient, poorly insulated, unfinished (no drywall) garages, low tech windows, some have galvanized steel pipes. Houses built after about 1998 in Temecula are a safer bet, avoid 1992-1997 builts in this area, absolute crap, there was no profit margin and corners were cut. Houses, like wines, have a vintage and each year is different. With a repo you will likely have similar expenses because flooring and landscaping needs replacement, with resale houses you’ll pay too much. I’m not nuts about wolf but it was an example you used, the builders are 50-100k over repos in their own tracts, this is going to hurt them and they will have to come down, all of wolf is upside down so the pressure will be there. Redhawk is older but the construction years vary, there is one tract still under construction on the last piece of premium land (hemmingway) and yesterday a repo came on the market for 329k, about 100k lower than new and it was dialed in as far as options go, probably lived in for a month, they are only on about the 30th house and the first ones are going under, they can’t keep that up much longer, on the other side of this bounce, look for 20% slashings at the builders.
temeculaguy
Participantrubbieslippers, God Bless your eldest son, I am cursed with a similar affliction and I love them too!
I’ve been gone for a while and just scanned through this thread, figured I’d weigh in with a “I could care less” vote, and it’s probably about time. With regards to Polygamy, who in the hell would want more than one wife? One is almost too many, but two or three? Didn’t anyone see Big love on HBO, that guy was miserable, three women nagging him, fighting with each other, he ran out of arms for them to pull on. For what? sexual variety? That can be easily found with far less misery than polygamy.
And what’s with this slippery slope crap, when they didn’t want women to have the right to vote they made the argument that one day a woman might end up president and that never happened…..o.k. bad example.
temeculaguy
Participantrubbieslippers, God Bless your eldest son, I am cursed with a similar affliction and I love them too!
I’ve been gone for a while and just scanned through this thread, figured I’d weigh in with a “I could care less” vote, and it’s probably about time. With regards to Polygamy, who in the hell would want more than one wife? One is almost too many, but two or three? Didn’t anyone see Big love on HBO, that guy was miserable, three women nagging him, fighting with each other, he ran out of arms for them to pull on. For what? sexual variety? That can be easily found with far less misery than polygamy.
And what’s with this slippery slope crap, when they didn’t want women to have the right to vote they made the argument that one day a woman might end up president and that never happened…..o.k. bad example.
temeculaguy
Participantrubbieslippers, God Bless your eldest son, I am cursed with a similar affliction and I love them too!
I’ve been gone for a while and just scanned through this thread, figured I’d weigh in with a “I could care less” vote, and it’s probably about time. With regards to Polygamy, who in the hell would want more than one wife? One is almost too many, but two or three? Didn’t anyone see Big love on HBO, that guy was miserable, three women nagging him, fighting with each other, he ran out of arms for them to pull on. For what? sexual variety? That can be easily found with far less misery than polygamy.
And what’s with this slippery slope crap, when they didn’t want women to have the right to vote they made the argument that one day a woman might end up president and that never happened…..o.k. bad example.
temeculaguy
Participantrubbieslippers, God Bless your eldest son, I am cursed with a similar affliction and I love them too!
I’ve been gone for a while and just scanned through this thread, figured I’d weigh in with a “I could care less” vote, and it’s probably about time. With regards to Polygamy, who in the hell would want more than one wife? One is almost too many, but two or three? Didn’t anyone see Big love on HBO, that guy was miserable, three women nagging him, fighting with each other, he ran out of arms for them to pull on. For what? sexual variety? That can be easily found with far less misery than polygamy.
And what’s with this slippery slope crap, when they didn’t want women to have the right to vote they made the argument that one day a woman might end up president and that never happened…..o.k. bad example.
temeculaguy
Participantrubbieslippers, God Bless your eldest son, I am cursed with a similar affliction and I love them too!
I’ve been gone for a while and just scanned through this thread, figured I’d weigh in with a “I could care less” vote, and it’s probably about time. With regards to Polygamy, who in the hell would want more than one wife? One is almost too many, but two or three? Didn’t anyone see Big love on HBO, that guy was miserable, three women nagging him, fighting with each other, he ran out of arms for them to pull on. For what? sexual variety? That can be easily found with far less misery than polygamy.
And what’s with this slippery slope crap, when they didn’t want women to have the right to vote they made the argument that one day a woman might end up president and that never happened…..o.k. bad example.
May 3, 2008 at 12:57 AM in reply to: Proposed quarry near Temecula/Fallbrook and home values? #198446temeculaguy
ParticipantSometimes these things get so far off topic I stop reading but now I am glad I did, two women agreeing on when a prenup is rational, just restored my faith in women.
And two phrases I will be adding to my vocabulary
1. “prior marital entanglements”
2. “well compensated pool boy”
instant classics, thank you
May 3, 2008 at 12:57 AM in reply to: Proposed quarry near Temecula/Fallbrook and home values? #198482temeculaguy
ParticipantSometimes these things get so far off topic I stop reading but now I am glad I did, two women agreeing on when a prenup is rational, just restored my faith in women.
And two phrases I will be adding to my vocabulary
1. “prior marital entanglements”
2. “well compensated pool boy”
instant classics, thank you
May 3, 2008 at 12:57 AM in reply to: Proposed quarry near Temecula/Fallbrook and home values? #198509temeculaguy
ParticipantSometimes these things get so far off topic I stop reading but now I am glad I did, two women agreeing on when a prenup is rational, just restored my faith in women.
And two phrases I will be adding to my vocabulary
1. “prior marital entanglements”
2. “well compensated pool boy”
instant classics, thank you
May 3, 2008 at 12:57 AM in reply to: Proposed quarry near Temecula/Fallbrook and home values? #198535temeculaguy
ParticipantSometimes these things get so far off topic I stop reading but now I am glad I did, two women agreeing on when a prenup is rational, just restored my faith in women.
And two phrases I will be adding to my vocabulary
1. “prior marital entanglements”
2. “well compensated pool boy”
instant classics, thank you
May 3, 2008 at 12:57 AM in reply to: Proposed quarry near Temecula/Fallbrook and home values? #198571temeculaguy
ParticipantSometimes these things get so far off topic I stop reading but now I am glad I did, two women agreeing on when a prenup is rational, just restored my faith in women.
And two phrases I will be adding to my vocabulary
1. “prior marital entanglements”
2. “well compensated pool boy”
instant classics, thank you
temeculaguy
ParticipantRDeniro hit the nail on the head, the Clintons are good at what they do and getting McCain elected is exactly what she wants for the reasons Deniro listed.
I’m so ready for a third party, I don’t like any of the three enough to get excited. Politics aside, I just don’t think I can make it through an entire term with Hillary on the radio every day without some form of mood altering elevating precription drug, her voice makes my skin crawl. Obama has a calming voice, McCain is like listening to the guys at the barber shop but Hillary will definately cause me to buy lots of cd’s and avoid all media outlets. A month ago I thought Obama had it in the bag but Hillary is going to prevent it.
Maybe I’ll go with sattelite radio and just ignore politics for a decade.
Before we get all bent out of shape, the federal government has so little influence on our real lives, I want more freeways and that’s all I want from the government, the fed doesn’t build freeways so it is of little concern to me. I want the guy who runs the company that built all the freeways in L.A. after the earthquake in a month to president.
Aecitia-good comments
-
AuthorPosts
