Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
temeculaguy
ParticipantNaw, I’m not buying it, 45% just for repair and vacancies of aprtments. Hope you got a screaming deal on the place if it was in knock down condition. My much smaller sample from my half dozen family owned rentals, runs under 20% and has been under that for 20 years, of which most are sfr’s in three so cal counties. They vary in return, a few have been sold and a few have been recently aquired but none come close to 45% operating, yet all are self managed, so the comparison may be moot. All of which are owned outright so it’s easy to see the operating cost since all of the income is income (unfortunately, they are all part of a trust and I get nothing monthly, hence my desire to build my own empire). If your family is paying 45% of the income in management costs and maintenance, i say you need to hire an auditor, something stinks in denmark.
temeculaguy
ParticipantNaw, I’m not buying it, 45% just for repair and vacancies of aprtments. Hope you got a screaming deal on the place if it was in knock down condition. My much smaller sample from my half dozen family owned rentals, runs under 20% and has been under that for 20 years, of which most are sfr’s in three so cal counties. They vary in return, a few have been sold and a few have been recently aquired but none come close to 45% operating, yet all are self managed, so the comparison may be moot. All of which are owned outright so it’s easy to see the operating cost since all of the income is income (unfortunately, they are all part of a trust and I get nothing monthly, hence my desire to build my own empire). If your family is paying 45% of the income in management costs and maintenance, i say you need to hire an auditor, something stinks in denmark.
temeculaguy
ParticipantNaw, I’m not buying it, 45% just for repair and vacancies of aprtments. Hope you got a screaming deal on the place if it was in knock down condition. My much smaller sample from my half dozen family owned rentals, runs under 20% and has been under that for 20 years, of which most are sfr’s in three so cal counties. They vary in return, a few have been sold and a few have been recently aquired but none come close to 45% operating, yet all are self managed, so the comparison may be moot. All of which are owned outright so it’s easy to see the operating cost since all of the income is income (unfortunately, they are all part of a trust and I get nothing monthly, hence my desire to build my own empire). If your family is paying 45% of the income in management costs and maintenance, i say you need to hire an auditor, something stinks in denmark.
temeculaguy
ParticipantI spoke too soon, dan cited a source, I’ll have to look into it and let you know if crow is on the menu.
temeculaguy
ParticipantI spoke too soon, dan cited a source, I’ll have to look into it and let you know if crow is on the menu.
temeculaguy
ParticipantI spoke too soon, dan cited a source, I’ll have to look into it and let you know if crow is on the menu.
temeculaguy
ParticipantI spoke too soon, dan cited a source, I’ll have to look into it and let you know if crow is on the menu.
temeculaguy
ParticipantI spoke too soon, dan cited a source, I’ll have to look into it and let you know if crow is on the menu.
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=danthedart]Historically the cost of operating a rental unit is 45%. So in order to rent out a home for a profit each month, 55% of rent needs to cover your mortgage plus taxes.
In otherwords, its very difficult for a SFR to be cash flow positive. [/quote]
Where is this “history?” 45%? 10% maybe 20%, but you would hard pressed to even find a single example of 45%. If you can find an example, you certainly wont find that to be the average. 10% for a repair fund and 10% for lost rent between renters and you should be fine in your calculations, if it’s less, great, but factoring a operating cost of 45% is silly. Even a mangement comapany that will handle escorw accounts for expenses, advertising, leasing, management and maintenance for complete hands off absentee owners does not charge 45%. Cite a source. please
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=danthedart]Historically the cost of operating a rental unit is 45%. So in order to rent out a home for a profit each month, 55% of rent needs to cover your mortgage plus taxes.
In otherwords, its very difficult for a SFR to be cash flow positive. [/quote]
Where is this “history?” 45%? 10% maybe 20%, but you would hard pressed to even find a single example of 45%. If you can find an example, you certainly wont find that to be the average. 10% for a repair fund and 10% for lost rent between renters and you should be fine in your calculations, if it’s less, great, but factoring a operating cost of 45% is silly. Even a mangement comapany that will handle escorw accounts for expenses, advertising, leasing, management and maintenance for complete hands off absentee owners does not charge 45%. Cite a source. please
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=danthedart]Historically the cost of operating a rental unit is 45%. So in order to rent out a home for a profit each month, 55% of rent needs to cover your mortgage plus taxes.
In otherwords, its very difficult for a SFR to be cash flow positive. [/quote]
Where is this “history?” 45%? 10% maybe 20%, but you would hard pressed to even find a single example of 45%. If you can find an example, you certainly wont find that to be the average. 10% for a repair fund and 10% for lost rent between renters and you should be fine in your calculations, if it’s less, great, but factoring a operating cost of 45% is silly. Even a mangement comapany that will handle escorw accounts for expenses, advertising, leasing, management and maintenance for complete hands off absentee owners does not charge 45%. Cite a source. please
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=danthedart]Historically the cost of operating a rental unit is 45%. So in order to rent out a home for a profit each month, 55% of rent needs to cover your mortgage plus taxes.
In otherwords, its very difficult for a SFR to be cash flow positive. [/quote]
Where is this “history?” 45%? 10% maybe 20%, but you would hard pressed to even find a single example of 45%. If you can find an example, you certainly wont find that to be the average. 10% for a repair fund and 10% for lost rent between renters and you should be fine in your calculations, if it’s less, great, but factoring a operating cost of 45% is silly. Even a mangement comapany that will handle escorw accounts for expenses, advertising, leasing, management and maintenance for complete hands off absentee owners does not charge 45%. Cite a source. please
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=danthedart]Historically the cost of operating a rental unit is 45%. So in order to rent out a home for a profit each month, 55% of rent needs to cover your mortgage plus taxes.
In otherwords, its very difficult for a SFR to be cash flow positive. [/quote]
Where is this “history?” 45%? 10% maybe 20%, but you would hard pressed to even find a single example of 45%. If you can find an example, you certainly wont find that to be the average. 10% for a repair fund and 10% for lost rent between renters and you should be fine in your calculations, if it’s less, great, but factoring a operating cost of 45% is silly. Even a mangement comapany that will handle escorw accounts for expenses, advertising, leasing, management and maintenance for complete hands off absentee owners does not charge 45%. Cite a source. please
temeculaguy
ParticipantSome of it is brand loyalty, some things stick with people. I have six female family members and four of them drive Honda odysseys, not because they want to impress anyone but because it isn’t their first Honda, some of them have had more than 3 hondas over the past 20 years and have never been dissapointed. They are fearful of hyundai’s because years ago they were crap, it will take a while for it to settle in and for some people that are older it never will. I think that new flagship hyundai sedan (cant remember the name) is cool, but once someone breaks 50, they like to go with what they know and trust, which explains why buick can still sell cars to the elderly. My mother has driven a honda since the 1980’s, I’m not sure she will ever change brands, no matter what the facts are.
-
AuthorPosts
