Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
sd_matt
ParticipantAlmost forgot
The libs, in my opinion, tend to favor the Muslim side of this thread, Israel, or any other argument. Most of the media is on that side. Most, if not all, of the Muslim world is much more conservative than even the Deep South. So it is contradictory that Libs would not take the same side of these issues as Americas more conservative crowd.
But really, do I need to explain this?
Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=sd_matt]…..or how bout a merger of Western and Sharia ideas. Pantyhose over the head.
Regarding rednecks; I think the strict Muslims are just extreme versions of good ole boys. They both need someone to be above, to step on. So I find it very ironic and contradictory that the Libs take the side of the Middle East and yet try very actively to “progress” the United States. Which is it? Conservative or Liberal? Pick one and stick to it across the board.
Back to the subject at hand regarding France
It sounds like backlash to me.[/quote]
A few questions on this comment.
Who is it exactly the Muslims are trying to be above? And what is the manifestation of that? I don’t see religious tradition as “being above”.
How do liberals “take the side” of the Middle East? And what exactly is the contradiction that you believe you’ve identified?
Last time I looked, France was in Europe. There are around 1.5 billion Muslims in the world, the majority are not in the Middle East. So what does this have to do with the Middle East?[/quote]
Like I said. It’s what I think. And like I said ..”strict Muslims”
The culture is like the south in that they seem to like to have someone to step on. Islam became the vehicle, the justification to do just that. Just like the racist good ole boys are “Christian”
Like I said about France “back to the subject at hand”
Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=sd_matt]…..or how bout a merger of Western and Sharia ideas. Pantyhose over the head.
Regarding rednecks; I think the strict Muslims are just extreme versions of good ole boys. They both need someone to be above, to step on. So I find it very ironic and contradictory that the Libs take the side of the Middle East and yet try very actively to “progress” the United States. Which is it? Conservative or Liberal? Pick one and stick to it across the board.
Back to the subject at hand regarding France
It sounds like backlash to me.[/quote]
A few questions on this comment.
Who is it exactly the Muslims are trying to be above? And what is the manifestation of that? I don’t see religious tradition as “being above”.
How do liberals “take the side” of the Middle East? And what exactly is the contradiction that you believe you’ve identified?
Last time I looked, France was in Europe. There are around 1.5 billion Muslims in the world, the majority are not in the Middle East. So what does this have to do with the Middle East?[/quote]
Like I said. It’s what I think. And like I said ..”strict Muslims”
The culture is like the south in that they seem to like to have someone to step on. Islam became the vehicle, the justification to do just that. Just like the racist good ole boys are “Christian”
Like I said about France “back to the subject at hand”
Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=sd_matt]…..or how bout a merger of Western and Sharia ideas. Pantyhose over the head.
Regarding rednecks; I think the strict Muslims are just extreme versions of good ole boys. They both need someone to be above, to step on. So I find it very ironic and contradictory that the Libs take the side of the Middle East and yet try very actively to “progress” the United States. Which is it? Conservative or Liberal? Pick one and stick to it across the board.
Back to the subject at hand regarding France
It sounds like backlash to me.[/quote]
A few questions on this comment.
Who is it exactly the Muslims are trying to be above? And what is the manifestation of that? I don’t see religious tradition as “being above”.
How do liberals “take the side” of the Middle East? And what exactly is the contradiction that you believe you’ve identified?
Last time I looked, France was in Europe. There are around 1.5 billion Muslims in the world, the majority are not in the Middle East. So what does this have to do with the Middle East?[/quote]
Like I said. It’s what I think. And like I said ..”strict Muslims”
The culture is like the south in that they seem to like to have someone to step on. Islam became the vehicle, the justification to do just that. Just like the racist good ole boys are “Christian”
Like I said about France “back to the subject at hand”
Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=sd_matt]…..or how bout a merger of Western and Sharia ideas. Pantyhose over the head.
Regarding rednecks; I think the strict Muslims are just extreme versions of good ole boys. They both need someone to be above, to step on. So I find it very ironic and contradictory that the Libs take the side of the Middle East and yet try very actively to “progress” the United States. Which is it? Conservative or Liberal? Pick one and stick to it across the board.
Back to the subject at hand regarding France
It sounds like backlash to me.[/quote]
A few questions on this comment.
Who is it exactly the Muslims are trying to be above? And what is the manifestation of that? I don’t see religious tradition as “being above”.
How do liberals “take the side” of the Middle East? And what exactly is the contradiction that you believe you’ve identified?
Last time I looked, France was in Europe. There are around 1.5 billion Muslims in the world, the majority are not in the Middle East. So what does this have to do with the Middle East?[/quote]
Like I said. It’s what I think. And like I said ..”strict Muslims”
The culture is like the south in that they seem to like to have someone to step on. Islam became the vehicle, the justification to do just that. Just like the racist good ole boys are “Christian”
Like I said about France “back to the subject at hand”
Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=sd_matt]…..or how bout a merger of Western and Sharia ideas. Pantyhose over the head.
Regarding rednecks; I think the strict Muslims are just extreme versions of good ole boys. They both need someone to be above, to step on. So I find it very ironic and contradictory that the Libs take the side of the Middle East and yet try very actively to “progress” the United States. Which is it? Conservative or Liberal? Pick one and stick to it across the board.
Back to the subject at hand regarding France
It sounds like backlash to me.[/quote]
A few questions on this comment.
Who is it exactly the Muslims are trying to be above? And what is the manifestation of that? I don’t see religious tradition as “being above”.
How do liberals “take the side” of the Middle East? And what exactly is the contradiction that you believe you’ve identified?
Last time I looked, France was in Europe. There are around 1.5 billion Muslims in the world, the majority are not in the Middle East. So what does this have to do with the Middle East?[/quote]
Like I said. It’s what I think. And like I said ..”strict Muslims”
The culture is like the south in that they seem to like to have someone to step on. Islam became the vehicle, the justification to do just that. Just like the racist good ole boys are “Christian”
Like I said about France “back to the subject at hand”
Participant…..or how bout a merger of Western and Sharia ideas. Pantyhose over the head.
Regarding rednecks; I think the strict Muslims are just extreme versions of good ole boys. They both need someone to be above, to step on. So I find it very ironic and contradictory that the Libs take the side of the Middle East and yet try very actively to “progress” the United States. Which is it? Conservative or Liberal? Pick one and stick to it across the board.
Back to the subject at hand regarding France
It sounds like backlash to me.
Participant…..or how bout a merger of Western and Sharia ideas. Pantyhose over the head.
Regarding rednecks; I think the strict Muslims are just extreme versions of good ole boys. They both need someone to be above, to step on. So I find it very ironic and contradictory that the Libs take the side of the Middle East and yet try very actively to “progress” the United States. Which is it? Conservative or Liberal? Pick one and stick to it across the board.
Back to the subject at hand regarding France
It sounds like backlash to me.
Participant…..or how bout a merger of Western and Sharia ideas. Pantyhose over the head.
Regarding rednecks; I think the strict Muslims are just extreme versions of good ole boys. They both need someone to be above, to step on. So I find it very ironic and contradictory that the Libs take the side of the Middle East and yet try very actively to “progress” the United States. Which is it? Conservative or Liberal? Pick one and stick to it across the board.
Back to the subject at hand regarding France
It sounds like backlash to me.
Participant…..or how bout a merger of Western and Sharia ideas. Pantyhose over the head.
Regarding rednecks; I think the strict Muslims are just extreme versions of good ole boys. They both need someone to be above, to step on. So I find it very ironic and contradictory that the Libs take the side of the Middle East and yet try very actively to “progress” the United States. Which is it? Conservative or Liberal? Pick one and stick to it across the board.
Back to the subject at hand regarding France
It sounds like backlash to me.
Participant…..or how bout a merger of Western and Sharia ideas. Pantyhose over the head.
Regarding rednecks; I think the strict Muslims are just extreme versions of good ole boys. They both need someone to be above, to step on. So I find it very ironic and contradictory that the Libs take the side of the Middle East and yet try very actively to “progress” the United States. Which is it? Conservative or Liberal? Pick one and stick to it across the board.
Back to the subject at hand regarding France
It sounds like backlash to me.
ParticipantRecast ( or is it reset? ) number two just getting underway. 57% is in CA. No renewal of unemployment benefits.
Aren’t these the 800lb gorilla in the room?
…and interest rates can only get down to 4% if every middleman wants to continue to make a profit…if I’m correct
I vote down for SD.
ParticipantRecast ( or is it reset? ) number two just getting underway. 57% is in CA. No renewal of unemployment benefits.
Aren’t these the 800lb gorilla in the room?
…and interest rates can only get down to 4% if every middleman wants to continue to make a profit…if I’m correct
I vote down for SD.
ParticipantRecast ( or is it reset? ) number two just getting underway. 57% is in CA. No renewal of unemployment benefits.
Aren’t these the 800lb gorilla in the room?
…and interest rates can only get down to 4% if every middleman wants to continue to make a profit…if I’m correct
I vote down for SD.
-
AuthorPosts
