[SD Attorney]

Great article from 2005. I love Ms. Pearson’s arrogant attitude about housing. My have times changed…

The house Ms. Pearson bought was at 2126 Albatross Street, 92101.

It turns out Ms. Pearson purchased her house for $580,000 in 2004 with $0 down. The house is now encumbered with $688,000 in loans and it is now vacant and for sale for $499,000. See: http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100017609-2126_Albatross_St_San_Diego_CA_92101

[SD Attorney]

Great article from 2005. I love Ms. Pearson’s arrogant attitude about housing. My have times changed…

The house Ms. Pearson bought was at 2126 Albatross Street, 92101.

It turns out Ms. Pearson purchased her house for $580,000 in 2004 with $0 down. The house is now encumbered with $688,000 in loans and it is now vacant and for sale for $499,000. See: http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100017609-2126_Albatross_St_San_Diego_CA_92101

[SD Attorney]

Great article from 2005. I love Ms. Pearson’s arrogant attitude about housing. My have times changed…

The house Ms. Pearson bought was at 2126 Albatross Street, 92101.

It turns out Ms. Pearson purchased her house for $580,000 in 2004 with $0 down. The house is now encumbered with $688,000 in loans and it is now vacant and for sale for $499,000. See: http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100017609-2126_Albatross_St_San_Diego_CA_92101

[SD Attorney]

Great article from 2005. I love Ms. Pearson’s arrogant attitude about housing. My have times changed…

The house Ms. Pearson bought was at 2126 Albatross Street, 92101.

It turns out Ms. Pearson purchased her house for $580,000 in 2004 with $0 down. The house is now encumbered with $688,000 in loans and it is now vacant and for sale for $499,000. See: http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100017609-2126_Albatross_St_San_Diego_CA_92101

[SD Attorney]

Great article from 2005. I love Ms. Pearson’s arrogant attitude about housing. My have times changed…

The house Ms. Pearson bought was at 2126 Albatross Street, 92101.

It turns out Ms. Pearson purchased her house for $580,000 in 2004 with $0 down. The house is now encumbered with $688,000 in loans and it is now vacant and for sale for $499,000. See: http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100017609-2126_Albatross_St_San_Diego_CA_92101

[SD Attorney]

You may have some rights against the sellers, depending on what was agreed to, signed, etc. Ultimately, you are in a tough spot since the deal has already closed and the sellers are long gone.

I think your idea about getting estimates and presenting them to the seller’s agent is a good start. Make sure you give her a deadline to respond back to you.

[SD Attorney]

You may have some rights against the sellers, depending on what was agreed to, signed, etc. Ultimately, you are in a tough spot since the deal has already closed and the sellers are long gone.

I think your idea about getting estimates and presenting them to the seller’s agent is a good start. Make sure you give her a deadline to respond back to you.

[SD Attorney]

You may have some rights against the sellers, depending on what was agreed to, signed, etc. Ultimately, you are in a tough spot since the deal has already closed and the sellers are long gone.

I think your idea about getting estimates and presenting them to the seller’s agent is a good start. Make sure you give her a deadline to respond back to you.

[SD Attorney]

You may have some rights against the sellers, depending on what was agreed to, signed, etc. Ultimately, you are in a tough spot since the deal has already closed and the sellers are long gone.

I think your idea about getting estimates and presenting them to the seller’s agent is a good start. Make sure you give her a deadline to respond back to you.

[SD Attorney]

You may have some rights against the sellers, depending on what was agreed to, signed, etc. Ultimately, you are in a tough spot since the deal has already closed and the sellers are long gone.

I think your idea about getting estimates and presenting them to the seller’s agent is a good start. Make sure you give her a deadline to respond back to you.

[SD Attorney]

SK in CV’s comments are pretty much dead on in my experience, unless of course there are major problems that are uncovered during the destructive testing stage, which is usually not the case.

I am a San Diego attorney and have also been involved in several construction defect lawsuits representing both homeowners and developers/contractors over the years.

I have not heard of the law firm that contacted you, but there are a lot of firms out there that do similar mass mailing type actions. There is a ten year statute of limitations on construction defect actions, so virtually any tract development will likely go through a construction defect lawsuit at some point in the first ten years following completion. Believe me, experts can always find something wrong with construction.

[SD Attorney]

SK in CV’s comments are pretty much dead on in my experience, unless of course there are major problems that are uncovered during the destructive testing stage, which is usually not the case.

I am a San Diego attorney and have also been involved in several construction defect lawsuits representing both homeowners and developers/contractors over the years.

I have not heard of the law firm that contacted you, but there are a lot of firms out there that do similar mass mailing type actions. There is a ten year statute of limitations on construction defect actions, so virtually any tract development will likely go through a construction defect lawsuit at some point in the first ten years following completion. Believe me, experts can always find something wrong with construction.

[SD Attorney]

SK in CV’s comments are pretty much dead on in my experience, unless of course there are major problems that are uncovered during the destructive testing stage, which is usually not the case.

I am a San Diego attorney and have also been involved in several construction defect lawsuits representing both homeowners and developers/contractors over the years.

I have not heard of the law firm that contacted you, but there are a lot of firms out there that do similar mass mailing type actions. There is a ten year statute of limitations on construction defect actions, so virtually any tract development will likely go through a construction defect lawsuit at some point in the first ten years following completion. Believe me, experts can always find something wrong with construction.

[SD Attorney]

SK in CV’s comments are pretty much dead on in my experience, unless of course there are major problems that are uncovered during the destructive testing stage, which is usually not the case.

I am a San Diego attorney and have also been involved in several construction defect lawsuits representing both homeowners and developers/contractors over the years.

I have not heard of the law firm that contacted you, but there are a lot of firms out there that do similar mass mailing type actions. There is a ten year statute of limitations on construction defect actions, so virtually any tract development will likely go through a construction defect lawsuit at some point in the first ten years following completion. Believe me, experts can always find something wrong with construction.

[SD Attorney]

SK in CV’s comments are pretty much dead on in my experience, unless of course there are major problems that are uncovered during the destructive testing stage, which is usually not the case.

I am a San Diego attorney and have also been involved in several construction defect lawsuits representing both homeowners and developers/contractors over the years.

I have not heard of the law firm that contacted you, but there are a lot of firms out there that do similar mass mailing type actions. There is a ten year statute of limitations on construction defect actions, so virtually any tract development will likely go through a construction defect lawsuit at some point in the first ten years following completion. Believe me, experts can always find something wrong with construction.

[Author]

Posts