Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
scaredyclassic
ParticipantMy opinion is that zombies, although not mentioned anywhere in the us constitution, absolutely affect interstate commerce, and the GOV has the power to regulate zombies. I think vampires should be left to the states tho
scaredyclassic
ParticipantIf you’re ever unlucky enough to be charged with a federal crime not on your list, don’t tell the judge that the case should be dismissed because the govt has no power to create federal criminal law.
Save a lot of money. Fed prison system must be costly to operate.
But what about this pesky “commerce clause”? What does it mean, affect interstate commerce?
And have you done your reading.
Bar exam results for July actually come out on Friday in case anyone knows someone waiting.
Hopefully they remembered the commerce clause intricacies in hot July.
scaredyclassic
ParticipantEach state has its own constitution and each state gets to interpret it’s own state constitution.
scaredyclassic
ParticipantI think my parents used to play scrabble and smoke with their buddies. I remember a little bit if cheese n crackers nobody ate. But lots of cigars and cigarettes.
I used to have to sit by a window not to choke.
scaredyclassic
ParticipantIn preparation I suggest you all watch the groundbreaking deadliest warrior episode entitled
zombies v vampires
really useful stuff.
scaredyclassic
ParticipantBefiriend weightlifters.
Or people who fast.
scaredyclassic
ParticipantThat sounds familiar. Penumbras. Due process.
What does Ron Paul say “due process” means?
Nobody claimed to be a con law genius.
It’s just, well, listening only to Ron Paul and reading a few referenced sections, and not reading a few hundred us supreme court opinions and mulling them over with other smart people, is likely to make you jump to conclusions that might be wrong.
scaredyclassic
ParticipantLol.
This attitude isn’t gonna help us pass the bar exam. We need to buckle down and study people
scaredyclassic
ParticipantWe actually read roe v Wade .. All these long opinions… I remember being grilled on some odd footnote and its potential significance
scaredyclassic
ParticipantAll I can vaguely remember is penumbra and due process.
Due process means….
Ummm…
Errr…..
I am not prepared for the exam.
scaredyclassic
ParticipantScreaming in all caps sounds unlawyerly. Try a subtler italicization for better results. I once was threatens with sanctions for using a larger font size in my youth in a portion of a motion. The court felt I was contemptuously yelling at it.
I ultimately wasn’t sanctioned but it was only due to my incredible ability to grovel and beg and apologize sincerely.
scaredyclassic
Participantyou say you want a revolution, well you know, we’d all love to change the world.
I’m really not trying to pull rank on you. really. but i did go to a top 20 law school, graduated at the top of the class, got the 2nd highest grade in con law.
we had conservative profs and liberal profs. often you couldn’t tell which was which. they were all hardcore scholars who questioned you hard and made you question what you thought you knew.
That said, I’ve forgotten pretty much everything.
but.
I remember that it’s not so simple.
scaredyclassic
ParticipantLOL?
sheesh.
scaredyclassic
ParticipantI guess that’s the problem. No just anybody gets to decide constitutional law issues. Ultimately, the Supreme Court gets the last say. You can disagree. You can say Gore v. Bush was a travesty, you can say Scalia is hypocritical, you can complain until you’re blue in the face…but the ultimate arbiter of constitutionality is the Supreme Court. If they say it is constitutional, then it is. That’s just the way it is.
If you ask me, I’d say Roe v. Wade did not violate the constitution. My opinion has nothing to do with the issues involved. My opinion is based on the fact that it is a validly issued United States Supreme Court opinion. If they had come outt he other way, I would have the same opinion. It’s constitutional.
-
AuthorPosts
