Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
scaredyclassic
Participantim excited about the idea of having a penisfree president, personally …
trumps weiner shall be forever shrouded in mystery. or perhaps it will be cut off and sold to.the highest bidder at death.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92126411
have you ever read the strange tale of where napoleons penis went? i guarantee this tale is interesting. i would like to see trumps cock travel a similarly amazing adventure postmortem.
scaredyclassic
Participant“thanks to various sex scandals, we have detailed descriptions of Bill Clinton’s penis. According to Robert Bennet, Clinton’s lawyer in the Paula Jones case, “In terms of size, shape, direction, whatever the devious mind wants to concoct, the president is a normal man. There are no blemishes, there are no moles, there are no growths.” The Independent offered a more prosaic account: “His erect penis is about five inches long, has the circumference of a quarter … and heads off at an angle, presumably rather like a finger bent at the joint.””
scaredyclassic
Participantwhat about a bachelor president?
or a,single gay president?
are we okay with a president hitting on !others while in office? if not, why not?
look i dont like the idea of rich old white dude thinking every woman wants him.
but others might not like a horny young gay president screwing lots of young interns in the oval office. or say a lesbian president who puts the moves on adoring young acolytes.
who should judge?
can only monagamous married heteros lead us? should only the dullest sexuality be acceptable?
frankly i think id rathet have a leader with good sexual energy.
sex can be a natural, zesty enterprise.
these old weirdos bring so much ickiness to the power dynamic aspect.
but i hate to diss a dude just based on perceived icky sexuality, even if it m8ght be almost or actually criminal…
and why oh why in this age where we know virtually everything do we not know the exact size of trumps cock???!!
scaredyclassic
Participantgiven how weird uptight and repressed we all are about sexuality, i would expect nearly every xandidate to be weird in some way…
scaredyclassic
Participantimagine some future candidate.
hes great.
you love him.
hes the best candidate. however, he loves to have sex with animals. thats a crime. but he can refrain while in office. do i not elect him just because he prefers having sex, with , say geese? no. i just dont really care. i cannot judge someones character in that way. a guy who likes to have sex with geese could still be the better leader.
i dont think trump sees it as nonconsensual. in his warped little mind, theyre consenting because hes a rich star. hes sick, and weird, but if he were the best candidate, i dont know that this should absolutely disqualify him. he thinks hes gods gift to women, that everyone wants him. like the bestiality guy should still be elected, maybe this in itself is not a fatal character flaw.
i dont know..
scaredyclassic
Participantneed more facts. im guessing theres some truth to what hes saying …that when youre rich, women and men will let u do anything to them.
id rather live in a world where people fight the power than just suck it off…
also im imaging some furure liberal candidate i like who is derailed for other sexual banter some people find offensive. id rather not have sex talk decide elections. peoples sexuality, however weird, shouldnt necessarily define their character, no matter how weird or quasicriminal
scaredyclassic
Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=scaredyclassic]im with BG on this one. it seems a little sad, but not really that offensive. hes a doofus lech, really the next generation of women will probably just krav maga douchebags like this in the nuts if they try to pull this crap on them.
would be hilarious if he tried to kiss some young chick and she grabbed his orange hair and slammed his face really hard into her knee and cracked his jaw.
but in its context its like talking to howard stern …he was probably trying to sound like a player.
shouldnt be what an election turns on, unless jesus.[/quote]
Bragging about physically abusing women isn’t that offensive?[/quote]
i was not offended in that context. it was jocular.
if he had been serious and meanspirited about going and grabbing some pussy at that moment, it would have been offensive. this was more of howard sternish performance art.
not great, politically, but i remain unoffended…im not condoning assault. indeed as i said i would enjoy watchingva tape of a modern young women breaking his face if he pulled any crap on her. but those remarks in that context just dont outrage me.
scaredyclassic
Participantim with BG on this one. it seems a little sad, but not really that offensive. hes a doofus lech, really the next generation of women will probably just krav maga douchebags like this in the nuts if they try to pull this crap on them.
would be hilarious if he tried to kiss some young chick and she grabbed his orange hair and slammed his face really hard into her knee and cracked his jaw.
but in its context its like talking to howard stern …he was probably trying to sound like a player.
shouldnt be what an election turns on, unless jesus.
scaredyclassic
Participant…
scaredyclassic
Participanti moved on her like a bitch?
what?
thats not a phrase.
sounds like michael scott trying to be normal with todd packer but failing.
this actually makes trump more sympathetic to me.
scaredyclassic
Participantits kind of lame locker room talk. he doesnt sound like a normal dude.
scaredyclassic
Participantmy kids may have bankrupted them. i encourage overeating for full value
October 5, 2016 at 7:04 AM in reply to: OT: Battle Ground Zero: Murrieta: Invasion of America #801835scaredyclassic
Participantadept or perish
scaredyclassic
Participantban plastic bags or youre not my friend
-
AuthorPosts
