Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 28, 2008 at 8:36 AM in reply to: Inflation as a risk factor; it may be time to buy soon #195720April 26, 2008 at 1:30 PM in reply to: 4S Ranch–Comparison of Remaining 4 Builders of 3000 sq ft homes #194947
Sandi Egan
ParticipantThanks for info, NTSD.
Could you please tell us a bit more about how different locations affect insurance prices? Jim the Realtor wrote recently about how difficult it is to insure a canyon-facing property. Is there anything else we should be looking out for?April 26, 2008 at 1:30 PM in reply to: 4S Ranch–Comparison of Remaining 4 Builders of 3000 sq ft homes #194980ParticipantThanks for info, NTSD.
Could you please tell us a bit more about how different locations affect insurance prices? Jim the Realtor wrote recently about how difficult it is to insure a canyon-facing property. Is there anything else we should be looking out for?April 26, 2008 at 1:30 PM in reply to: 4S Ranch–Comparison of Remaining 4 Builders of 3000 sq ft homes #195002ParticipantThanks for info, NTSD.
Could you please tell us a bit more about how different locations affect insurance prices? Jim the Realtor wrote recently about how difficult it is to insure a canyon-facing property. Is there anything else we should be looking out for?April 26, 2008 at 1:30 PM in reply to: 4S Ranch–Comparison of Remaining 4 Builders of 3000 sq ft homes #195021ParticipantThanks for info, NTSD.
Could you please tell us a bit more about how different locations affect insurance prices? Jim the Realtor wrote recently about how difficult it is to insure a canyon-facing property. Is there anything else we should be looking out for?April 26, 2008 at 1:30 PM in reply to: 4S Ranch–Comparison of Remaining 4 Builders of 3000 sq ft homes #195064ParticipantThanks for info, NTSD.
Could you please tell us a bit more about how different locations affect insurance prices? Jim the Realtor wrote recently about how difficult it is to insure a canyon-facing property. Is there anything else we should be looking out for?April 26, 2008 at 1:01 AM in reply to: 4S Ranch–Comparison of Remaining 4 Builders of 3000 sq ft homes #194802ParticipantPersonally I like Silhouette (especially plan 3), but I’d go for the lowest priced one. Pienza is way overpriced IMO. Maybeck has to cost 100-150K less than others to compete.
If you decide to proceed with the purchase, please keep us informed how it goes.
April 26, 2008 at 1:01 AM in reply to: 4S Ranch–Comparison of Remaining 4 Builders of 3000 sq ft homes #194834ParticipantPersonally I like Silhouette (especially plan 3), but I’d go for the lowest priced one. Pienza is way overpriced IMO. Maybeck has to cost 100-150K less than others to compete.
If you decide to proceed with the purchase, please keep us informed how it goes.
April 26, 2008 at 1:01 AM in reply to: 4S Ranch–Comparison of Remaining 4 Builders of 3000 sq ft homes #194858ParticipantPersonally I like Silhouette (especially plan 3), but I’d go for the lowest priced one. Pienza is way overpriced IMO. Maybeck has to cost 100-150K less than others to compete.
If you decide to proceed with the purchase, please keep us informed how it goes.
April 26, 2008 at 1:01 AM in reply to: 4S Ranch–Comparison of Remaining 4 Builders of 3000 sq ft homes #194876ParticipantPersonally I like Silhouette (especially plan 3), but I’d go for the lowest priced one. Pienza is way overpriced IMO. Maybeck has to cost 100-150K less than others to compete.
If you decide to proceed with the purchase, please keep us informed how it goes.
April 26, 2008 at 1:01 AM in reply to: 4S Ranch–Comparison of Remaining 4 Builders of 3000 sq ft homes #194920ParticipantPersonally I like Silhouette (especially plan 3), but I’d go for the lowest priced one. Pienza is way overpriced IMO. Maybeck has to cost 100-150K less than others to compete.
If you decide to proceed with the purchase, please keep us informed how it goes.
ParticipantSandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich.
I don’t think there is an objective definition of the term, otherwise we wouldn’t have this discussion. My definition goes like this:
I am well off if I can afford what I need.
I am rich if I can afford what I want.My point is, if you want to quit your job but can’t afford to, you will not feel rich.
ParticipantSandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich.
I don’t think there is an objective definition of the term, otherwise we wouldn’t have this discussion. My definition goes like this:
I am well off if I can afford what I need.
I am rich if I can afford what I want.My point is, if you want to quit your job but can’t afford to, you will not feel rich.
ParticipantSandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich.
I don’t think there is an objective definition of the term, otherwise we wouldn’t have this discussion. My definition goes like this:
I am well off if I can afford what I need.
I am rich if I can afford what I want.My point is, if you want to quit your job but can’t afford to, you will not feel rich.
ParticipantSandi, nothing is wrong with working. it’s just that is definition of being rich.
I don’t think there is an objective definition of the term, otherwise we wouldn’t have this discussion. My definition goes like this:
I am well off if I can afford what I need.
I am rich if I can afford what I want.My point is, if you want to quit your job but can’t afford to, you will not feel rich.
-
AuthorPosts
