Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
rnen
ParticipantYep, thats the answer alright…. have the government control a single bank. That would solve all our problems, I mean look how successful the past administrations, BOTH Dem. and Rep., have been at running any programs. The astounding results of the Social Security program is all I need to see! How could we all have been so blind to the obvious answer to all of these problems… bigger and better government. Hey, we already have two people that could step in and run the bank so success would be assured and good times and prospierity for all would result… Barney Frank and Chuck Shumer!!
ParticipantYep, thats the answer alright…. have the government control a single bank. That would solve all our problems, I mean look how successful the past administrations, BOTH Dem. and Rep., have been at running any programs. The astounding results of the Social Security program is all I need to see! How could we all have been so blind to the obvious answer to all of these problems… bigger and better government. Hey, we already have two people that could step in and run the bank so success would be assured and good times and prospierity for all would result… Barney Frank and Chuck Shumer!!
ParticipantYep, thats the answer alright…. have the government control a single bank. That would solve all our problems, I mean look how successful the past administrations, BOTH Dem. and Rep., have been at running any programs. The astounding results of the Social Security program is all I need to see! How could we all have been so blind to the obvious answer to all of these problems… bigger and better government. Hey, we already have two people that could step in and run the bank so success would be assured and good times and prospierity for all would result… Barney Frank and Chuck Shumer!!
ParticipantYep, thats the answer alright…. have the government control a single bank. That would solve all our problems, I mean look how successful the past administrations, BOTH Dem. and Rep., have been at running any programs. The astounding results of the Social Security program is all I need to see! How could we all have been so blind to the obvious answer to all of these problems… bigger and better government. Hey, we already have two people that could step in and run the bank so success would be assured and good times and prospierity for all would result… Barney Frank and Chuck Shumer!!
February 6, 2009 at 6:53 AM in reply to: OT: Obama Breaks Another Pledge: A Cabinet Full of Lobbyists #341780Participant[quote=gandalf]You people sound a bit ‘sensitive’.
“Oh, the dishonesty!! <oooohhh…> Lobbyists!”
– 9/11 / Bin Laden…
– Iraq War / WMD…
– Hurricane Katrina…
– Terry Schiavo…
– Economic Meltdown…
Speaking to the GOP on behalf of the majority of this country? You lost. If you had any class you’d quit whining. At least for a little while. We’ve got real problems on our hands.
My money says you keep whining…
[/quote]You mean the way the Dems didnt whine during the Bush Admin. ???? Now I agree that he efed up a lot of things and deserved to be called out. Tell me Gandalf….. why should Obama be any different? In a lot of peoples minds he has made some very poor decisions in his first couple of weeks in office and looks like he is to make some more. The freaking bipartisan hipocrisy is laughable.
February 6, 2009 at 6:53 AM in reply to: OT: Obama Breaks Another Pledge: A Cabinet Full of Lobbyists #342102Participant[quote=gandalf]You people sound a bit ‘sensitive’.
“Oh, the dishonesty!! <oooohhh…> Lobbyists!”
– 9/11 / Bin Laden…
– Iraq War / WMD…
– Hurricane Katrina…
– Terry Schiavo…
– Economic Meltdown…
Speaking to the GOP on behalf of the majority of this country? You lost. If you had any class you’d quit whining. At least for a little while. We’ve got real problems on our hands.
My money says you keep whining…
[/quote]You mean the way the Dems didnt whine during the Bush Admin. ???? Now I agree that he efed up a lot of things and deserved to be called out. Tell me Gandalf….. why should Obama be any different? In a lot of peoples minds he has made some very poor decisions in his first couple of weeks in office and looks like he is to make some more. The freaking bipartisan hipocrisy is laughable.
February 6, 2009 at 6:53 AM in reply to: OT: Obama Breaks Another Pledge: A Cabinet Full of Lobbyists #342206Participant[quote=gandalf]You people sound a bit ‘sensitive’.
“Oh, the dishonesty!! <oooohhh…> Lobbyists!”
– 9/11 / Bin Laden…
– Iraq War / WMD…
– Hurricane Katrina…
– Terry Schiavo…
– Economic Meltdown…
Speaking to the GOP on behalf of the majority of this country? You lost. If you had any class you’d quit whining. At least for a little while. We’ve got real problems on our hands.
My money says you keep whining…
[/quote]You mean the way the Dems didnt whine during the Bush Admin. ???? Now I agree that he efed up a lot of things and deserved to be called out. Tell me Gandalf….. why should Obama be any different? In a lot of peoples minds he has made some very poor decisions in his first couple of weeks in office and looks like he is to make some more. The freaking bipartisan hipocrisy is laughable.
February 6, 2009 at 6:53 AM in reply to: OT: Obama Breaks Another Pledge: A Cabinet Full of Lobbyists #342234Participant[quote=gandalf]You people sound a bit ‘sensitive’.
“Oh, the dishonesty!! <oooohhh…> Lobbyists!”
– 9/11 / Bin Laden…
– Iraq War / WMD…
– Hurricane Katrina…
– Terry Schiavo…
– Economic Meltdown…
Speaking to the GOP on behalf of the majority of this country? You lost. If you had any class you’d quit whining. At least for a little while. We’ve got real problems on our hands.
My money says you keep whining…
[/quote]You mean the way the Dems didnt whine during the Bush Admin. ???? Now I agree that he efed up a lot of things and deserved to be called out. Tell me Gandalf….. why should Obama be any different? In a lot of peoples minds he has made some very poor decisions in his first couple of weeks in office and looks like he is to make some more. The freaking bipartisan hipocrisy is laughable.
February 6, 2009 at 6:53 AM in reply to: OT: Obama Breaks Another Pledge: A Cabinet Full of Lobbyists #342328Participant[quote=gandalf]You people sound a bit ‘sensitive’.
“Oh, the dishonesty!! <oooohhh…> Lobbyists!”
– 9/11 / Bin Laden…
– Iraq War / WMD…
– Hurricane Katrina…
– Terry Schiavo…
– Economic Meltdown…
Speaking to the GOP on behalf of the majority of this country? You lost. If you had any class you’d quit whining. At least for a little while. We’ve got real problems on our hands.
My money says you keep whining…
[/quote]You mean the way the Dems didnt whine during the Bush Admin. ???? Now I agree that he efed up a lot of things and deserved to be called out. Tell me Gandalf….. why should Obama be any different? In a lot of peoples minds he has made some very poor decisions in his first couple of weeks in office and looks like he is to make some more. The freaking bipartisan hipocrisy is laughable.
Participant[quote=lubenthrust][quote=rnen]My guess is that if thier high tech companies were suddenly hireing illegal immigrants at half the pay and see thier pay scale cut in half they would be whistling a different tune.[/quote]
Yes, this happens quite frequently, actually. It’s called outsourcing. Except the “illegal immigrants” stay in their own countries, and the workers here see their pay cut 100% rather than in half.
[quote=rnen]Oh yeah, the senate removed language in the the Obama spending bill that would have required a SS# to be eligable for some of the programs. Way too look out for the legal poor and working class Obama! Ahh yes, some bold change is on the horizon![/quote]
If this is sarcasm, which is likely given the tone of the rest of your post, this comment makes no sense whatsoever. Is Obama responsible for the removal of the SSN eligibility requirement, or is the Senate? Think carefully.[/quote]
And this somehow makes illegal immigration into the country OK??? The blue collar worker should just suck it up because the white collar worker is seeing his job outsourced????
Are the workers in thier own countries also having thier kids education and families health care provided by the American tax payer while contributing very little or nothing to the tax base?
Point taken on the SS issue, I’ll give you that one although I have not heard him make any objection to its removal. As wrong as it is I can see the motivation for a republican to want this out of the bill, being that they are corrupted by big business and all, but what motivates democrates to screw the very people they say they are here to protect? They are the party for the working man arent they?
Ugh… can’t seem to shake the sarcasm… sorry:)
Participant[quote=lubenthrust][quote=rnen]My guess is that if thier high tech companies were suddenly hireing illegal immigrants at half the pay and see thier pay scale cut in half they would be whistling a different tune.[/quote]
Yes, this happens quite frequently, actually. It’s called outsourcing. Except the “illegal immigrants” stay in their own countries, and the workers here see their pay cut 100% rather than in half.
[quote=rnen]Oh yeah, the senate removed language in the the Obama spending bill that would have required a SS# to be eligable for some of the programs. Way too look out for the legal poor and working class Obama! Ahh yes, some bold change is on the horizon![/quote]
If this is sarcasm, which is likely given the tone of the rest of your post, this comment makes no sense whatsoever. Is Obama responsible for the removal of the SSN eligibility requirement, or is the Senate? Think carefully.[/quote]
And this somehow makes illegal immigration into the country OK??? The blue collar worker should just suck it up because the white collar worker is seeing his job outsourced????
Are the workers in thier own countries also having thier kids education and families health care provided by the American tax payer while contributing very little or nothing to the tax base?
Point taken on the SS issue, I’ll give you that one although I have not heard him make any objection to its removal. As wrong as it is I can see the motivation for a republican to want this out of the bill, being that they are corrupted by big business and all, but what motivates democrates to screw the very people they say they are here to protect? They are the party for the working man arent they?
Ugh… can’t seem to shake the sarcasm… sorry:)
Participant[quote=lubenthrust][quote=rnen]My guess is that if thier high tech companies were suddenly hireing illegal immigrants at half the pay and see thier pay scale cut in half they would be whistling a different tune.[/quote]
Yes, this happens quite frequently, actually. It’s called outsourcing. Except the “illegal immigrants” stay in their own countries, and the workers here see their pay cut 100% rather than in half.
[quote=rnen]Oh yeah, the senate removed language in the the Obama spending bill that would have required a SS# to be eligable for some of the programs. Way too look out for the legal poor and working class Obama! Ahh yes, some bold change is on the horizon![/quote]
If this is sarcasm, which is likely given the tone of the rest of your post, this comment makes no sense whatsoever. Is Obama responsible for the removal of the SSN eligibility requirement, or is the Senate? Think carefully.[/quote]
And this somehow makes illegal immigration into the country OK??? The blue collar worker should just suck it up because the white collar worker is seeing his job outsourced????
Are the workers in thier own countries also having thier kids education and families health care provided by the American tax payer while contributing very little or nothing to the tax base?
Point taken on the SS issue, I’ll give you that one although I have not heard him make any objection to its removal. As wrong as it is I can see the motivation for a republican to want this out of the bill, being that they are corrupted by big business and all, but what motivates democrates to screw the very people they say they are here to protect? They are the party for the working man arent they?
Ugh… can’t seem to shake the sarcasm… sorry:)
Participant[quote=lubenthrust][quote=rnen]My guess is that if thier high tech companies were suddenly hireing illegal immigrants at half the pay and see thier pay scale cut in half they would be whistling a different tune.[/quote]
Yes, this happens quite frequently, actually. It’s called outsourcing. Except the “illegal immigrants” stay in their own countries, and the workers here see their pay cut 100% rather than in half.
[quote=rnen]Oh yeah, the senate removed language in the the Obama spending bill that would have required a SS# to be eligable for some of the programs. Way too look out for the legal poor and working class Obama! Ahh yes, some bold change is on the horizon![/quote]
If this is sarcasm, which is likely given the tone of the rest of your post, this comment makes no sense whatsoever. Is Obama responsible for the removal of the SSN eligibility requirement, or is the Senate? Think carefully.[/quote]
And this somehow makes illegal immigration into the country OK??? The blue collar worker should just suck it up because the white collar worker is seeing his job outsourced????
Are the workers in thier own countries also having thier kids education and families health care provided by the American tax payer while contributing very little or nothing to the tax base?
Point taken on the SS issue, I’ll give you that one although I have not heard him make any objection to its removal. As wrong as it is I can see the motivation for a republican to want this out of the bill, being that they are corrupted by big business and all, but what motivates democrates to screw the very people they say they are here to protect? They are the party for the working man arent they?
Ugh… can’t seem to shake the sarcasm… sorry:)
Participant[quote=lubenthrust][quote=rnen]My guess is that if thier high tech companies were suddenly hireing illegal immigrants at half the pay and see thier pay scale cut in half they would be whistling a different tune.[/quote]
Yes, this happens quite frequently, actually. It’s called outsourcing. Except the “illegal immigrants” stay in their own countries, and the workers here see their pay cut 100% rather than in half.
[quote=rnen]Oh yeah, the senate removed language in the the Obama spending bill that would have required a SS# to be eligable for some of the programs. Way too look out for the legal poor and working class Obama! Ahh yes, some bold change is on the horizon![/quote]
If this is sarcasm, which is likely given the tone of the rest of your post, this comment makes no sense whatsoever. Is Obama responsible for the removal of the SSN eligibility requirement, or is the Senate? Think carefully.[/quote]
And this somehow makes illegal immigration into the country OK??? The blue collar worker should just suck it up because the white collar worker is seeing his job outsourced????
Are the workers in thier own countries also having thier kids education and families health care provided by the American tax payer while contributing very little or nothing to the tax base?
Point taken on the SS issue, I’ll give you that one although I have not heard him make any objection to its removal. As wrong as it is I can see the motivation for a republican to want this out of the bill, being that they are corrupted by big business and all, but what motivates democrates to screw the very people they say they are here to protect? They are the party for the working man arent they?
Ugh… can’t seem to shake the sarcasm… sorry:)
-
AuthorPosts