[Rich Toscano]

[quote=CDMA ENG][quote=Blogstar]Paramount is not a troll. he just says that anyone who disagrees with him is a homosexual pedophile. Perfectly logical if you are paranoid.

What’s the difference if the kids learn about religious cultures or that some humans pair bond with the same sex? I wish we had a large religion and philosophy survey curricula starting in kindergarten. Anthropology too…then all the kids who are going to drop out could get the good stuff first.[/quote]

That’s a little unfair. Homophob is an argueable point but pedophile…

He never alluded to that.

CE[/quote]

CE, you must have missed the piggington.com Quote of the Year:

[quote=Paramount]The comments I’m reading here are VERY disturbing. Is this a NMBLA Board in disguise?[/quote]

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=CA renter][quote=urbanrealtor]

And truly, if you ever meet Rich in person, you will find his youthful appearance striking and upsetting.

Very creepy.[/quote]

He literally looks half his age. It’s pretty incredible. He could make billions of dollars if he could market whatever it is that he does (probably genes, though).[/quote]

CAR, you are far too kind (as is Dan in his own special way). My secret: keeping all the stress balled up on the inside. That’s what you’re supposed to do, right?

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=urbanrealtor]

I have missed Paramount’s posts soooo much.

Damn.

My thoughts:

1: AFX is gay (his wife told me).

2: Rich is gay (which is why he drives a gay car and has like 2% body fat).

3: Paramount is gayer than anyone else here. But closeted.

4: I mean seriously:
Who cares?
My sons are 2 and 5 years old.
Each has friends with same sex parents.
Kids are always interested in that shit.
One of my agents (who has a kid at the daycare where my younger son goes) describes his 4-year-old’s best friend shouting “but he NEEDS a mommy!!” (cuz my agent is a homo).
The same girl once asked me where my hair had gone.
Kids pay attention to things (including family structure).
It happens.
Last I checked this did not lead either of my sons to don a leather harness or a ball gag.
However, the visual that creates does make me giggle.

Paramount, stay in Temecula and let us decent folk get on with our lives free of ignorant people who think they are moral (when they aren’t).

Your version of morality is nuts and a pretty good example of why having kids should require a license.[/quote]

Ha! Dan, I’ve been hoping you’d bring your talents to bear on this thread… that was worth the wait.

[Rich Toscano]

I will look into it…

[Rich Toscano]

K, never mind… someone else gave me the info and that user is blocked. If it happens again, though please let me know… thanks.

[Rich Toscano]

You got a spam message as a piggington private messages? I haven’t heard of this before… can you please tell me the name of the sender so that I can delete the account? Thanks for the heads up.

[Rich Toscano]

I can’t believe I’m still wasting my time on this, but…

[quote=paramount]
Teaching young children (elem age) in a school about matters regarding hetero/homo relationships is immoral, period. [/quote]

Now you are back to complaining about teaching kids about “relationships” in general, but I don’t see any cheesy, melodramatic videos about the radical agenda to teach kids about heterosexual relationships.

Let me spell it out very clearly, yet again. My issue with your posts isn’t about what should or should not be taught by children. My issue is that (despite your weak protestations to the contrary) you very obviously have a problem with gay people. And I have a problem with that.

[quote=paramount]
The comments I’m reading here are VERY disturbing. Is this a NMBLA Board in disguise?
[/quote]

Ha! This has my vote for the best pigg comment of the year…

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=paramount][quote=Rich Toscano][quote=paramount]
Caution: The following video could be disturbing to those with a conscious/morals.
[/quote]

Yeah, good thing you’re not homophobic.[/quote]

It just goes to show how far down the rat hole society is when you can’t take a position that:

No form of gender relationship issues of any type should be discussed or even suggested to elementary school children.

Again: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN!!

Without being labeled a homophobe.

Sick. Really Sick.[/quote]

Nice attempt at misdirection.

You said:

“The following video could be disturbing to those with a conscious/morals.”

…and thus, you equated being gay with lacking morals or “a conscious.”

This was after the histrionics about a radical gay agenda, and saying that you were “sickened,” because a reading assignment mentioned that two women adopted a child.

So yeah, you sure come across as homophobic to me.

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=paramount]
Caution: The following video could be disturbing to those with a conscious/morals.
[/quote]

Yeah, good thing you’re not homophobic.

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=sdduuuude]
Well, maybe against the radical ones with an agenda, which is likely not very many.[/quote]

That’s my point — there is no “radical gay agenda” here.

Here’s what happened: a reading assignment mentioned, in passing, 2 women adopting a child together. Where exactly is the “radical agenda?” I don’t see it.

OP’s takeaway: “Radical gay agenda! It sickens me!”

You are giving him a pass by saying it’s not about the gays, that it’s about early discussion of sexuality.

First, there’s nothing radical about that. I remember getting sex education in 5th grade. That was in 1981. And it was way more explicit than this, which is really just about two women adopting a child together (you could probably skirt the sex part pretty easily if the child asks about it).

Second, if it’s just about any mention of sexuality, why is the title The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools? Why isn’t it The Radical Early Sex Education Agenda?

So, like I said (more succinctly) in my first post:

oblique mention to a youngster of two women adopting a child ==
an “agenda”, and also, “sickening”

Sounds pretty anti-gay to me.

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=sdduuuude]

The point is not against homosexuals.

[/quote]

Title of the post:

OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools

[Rich Toscano]

Passing mention of a same-sex couple = “radical gay agenda”

[Rich Toscano]

Great to hear from you, TG, and really happy to hear you are doing so well. Your great posts are definitely missed. (Not that I have much to say about it… I am pretty much a lurker myself these days).

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=earlyretirement]
Yes, LOTS to complain about but also their task is an almost impossible task sometimes.[/quote]

Yes, but it needn’t have become the impossible situation that it is… that’s really the biggest complaint imho.

[Rich Toscano]

There are so many legitimate reasons to be critical of the Fed… THAT’S what you pick to complain about?

[Author]

Posts