[Ricechex]

[quote=CBad][quote=briansd1]
davelj is not arrogant. He’s confident. He speaks the honest truth rather than mince words. That’s admirable in my opinion.

I would agree with scaredcat’s assessment on attraction. I would say that confidence is attractive.[/quote]

Hey sorry we couldn’t find a match for you, Josh. But I must say it’s just adorable to see this side love connection brewing. ♥ ♥ ♥[/quote]

I have suspected that Davelj and BrianSD are the same person.

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]Careful Ca renter, you are getting scary and moralistic. We aren’t all davelj. Oh wait we are.

You basically have two options, always wear a condom after doing a visual spot check for herpes sores, coupled with never having oral sex. Option two extend some trust to potential partners, but pre-screen them, your methods may vary.

Funny how this morphed from my appeal for a date, to a frank discussion on STD’s. I figure they are proof that god loves us and wants us to be happy, covered head to toe in latex.

Josh[/quote]
Davelj is an arrogant man, and that is not attractive. You on the other hand, seem like a nice guy. Nice guys do finish first.

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]Careful Ca renter, you are getting scary and moralistic. We aren’t all davelj. Oh wait we are.

You basically have two options, always wear a condom after doing a visual spot check for herpes sores, coupled with never having oral sex. Option two extend some trust to potential partners, but pre-screen them, your methods may vary.

Funny how this morphed from my appeal for a date, to a frank discussion on STD’s. I figure they are proof that god loves us and wants us to be happy, covered head to toe in latex.

Josh[/quote]
Davelj is an arrogant man, and that is not attractive. You on the other hand, seem like a nice guy. Nice guys do finish first.

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]Careful Ca renter, you are getting scary and moralistic. We aren’t all davelj. Oh wait we are.

You basically have two options, always wear a condom after doing a visual spot check for herpes sores, coupled with never having oral sex. Option two extend some trust to potential partners, but pre-screen them, your methods may vary.

Funny how this morphed from my appeal for a date, to a frank discussion on STD’s. I figure they are proof that god loves us and wants us to be happy, covered head to toe in latex.

Josh[/quote]
Davelj is an arrogant man, and that is not attractive. You on the other hand, seem like a nice guy. Nice guys do finish first.

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]Careful Ca renter, you are getting scary and moralistic. We aren’t all davelj. Oh wait we are.

You basically have two options, always wear a condom after doing a visual spot check for herpes sores, coupled with never having oral sex. Option two extend some trust to potential partners, but pre-screen them, your methods may vary.

Funny how this morphed from my appeal for a date, to a frank discussion on STD’s. I figure they are proof that god loves us and wants us to be happy, covered head to toe in latex.

Josh[/quote]
Davelj is an arrogant man, and that is not attractive. You on the other hand, seem like a nice guy. Nice guys do finish first.

[Ricechex]

[quote=barnaby33]Careful Ca renter, you are getting scary and moralistic. We aren’t all davelj. Oh wait we are.

You basically have two options, always wear a condom after doing a visual spot check for herpes sores, coupled with never having oral sex. Option two extend some trust to potential partners, but pre-screen them, your methods may vary.

Funny how this morphed from my appeal for a date, to a frank discussion on STD’s. I figure they are proof that god loves us and wants us to be happy, covered head to toe in latex.

Josh[/quote]
Davelj is an arrogant man, and that is not attractive. You on the other hand, seem like a nice guy. Nice guys do finish first.

[Ricechex]

Thumbs down.

[Ricechex]

Thumbs down.

[Ricechex]

Thumbs down.

[Ricechex]

Thumbs down.

[Ricechex]

Thumbs down.

[Ricechex]

[quote=Arraya]Heck, the world gave a peace prize to the man responsible for starting a war and dropping the most bombs and killing the most people. It does not get weirder than that.

War is peace
Debt is wealth

sane is crazy…haha

On a lighter note. Check out the movie Collapse. It happens to be about a man that has shares a lot of my views. Or to put anther way, he put a lot of things together that I have concluded independently.

Roger Ebert gave it four stars.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091209/REVIEWS/912099993

If this man is correct, then you may be reading the most important story in today’s paper.

I have no way of assuring you that the bleak version of the future outlined by Michael Ruppert in Chris Smith’s “Collapse” is accurate. I can only tell you I have a pretty good built-in B.S. detector, and its needle never bounced off zero while I watched this film. There is controversy over Ruppert, and he has many critics. But one simple fact at the center of his argument is obviously true, and it terrifies me.

“I don’t know when I’ve seen a thriller more frightening. I couldn’t tear my eyes from the screen. “Collapse” is even entertaining, in a macabre sense. I think you owe it to yourself to see it

Trailer

http://www.collapsemovie.com/COLLAPSEMOVIE/

It’s playing at the Ken tonight. I believe it is also available on pay per view. I’m going to watch it in DC tonight.[/quote]

Thanks for the heads up Arraya, trying to scout out a friend right now to go see it.

[Ricechex]

[quote=Arraya]Heck, the world gave a peace prize to the man responsible for starting a war and dropping the most bombs and killing the most people. It does not get weirder than that.

War is peace
Debt is wealth

sane is crazy…haha

On a lighter note. Check out the movie Collapse. It happens to be about a man that has shares a lot of my views. Or to put anther way, he put a lot of things together that I have concluded independently.

Roger Ebert gave it four stars.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091209/REVIEWS/912099993

If this man is correct, then you may be reading the most important story in today’s paper.

I have no way of assuring you that the bleak version of the future outlined by Michael Ruppert in Chris Smith’s “Collapse” is accurate. I can only tell you I have a pretty good built-in B.S. detector, and its needle never bounced off zero while I watched this film. There is controversy over Ruppert, and he has many critics. But one simple fact at the center of his argument is obviously true, and it terrifies me.

“I don’t know when I’ve seen a thriller more frightening. I couldn’t tear my eyes from the screen. “Collapse” is even entertaining, in a macabre sense. I think you owe it to yourself to see it

Trailer

http://www.collapsemovie.com/COLLAPSEMOVIE/

It’s playing at the Ken tonight. I believe it is also available on pay per view. I’m going to watch it in DC tonight.[/quote]

Thanks for the heads up Arraya, trying to scout out a friend right now to go see it.

[Ricechex]

[quote=Arraya]Heck, the world gave a peace prize to the man responsible for starting a war and dropping the most bombs and killing the most people. It does not get weirder than that.

War is peace
Debt is wealth

sane is crazy…haha

On a lighter note. Check out the movie Collapse. It happens to be about a man that has shares a lot of my views. Or to put anther way, he put a lot of things together that I have concluded independently.

Roger Ebert gave it four stars.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091209/REVIEWS/912099993

If this man is correct, then you may be reading the most important story in today’s paper.

I have no way of assuring you that the bleak version of the future outlined by Michael Ruppert in Chris Smith’s “Collapse” is accurate. I can only tell you I have a pretty good built-in B.S. detector, and its needle never bounced off zero while I watched this film. There is controversy over Ruppert, and he has many critics. But one simple fact at the center of his argument is obviously true, and it terrifies me.

“I don’t know when I’ve seen a thriller more frightening. I couldn’t tear my eyes from the screen. “Collapse” is even entertaining, in a macabre sense. I think you owe it to yourself to see it

Trailer

http://www.collapsemovie.com/COLLAPSEMOVIE/

It’s playing at the Ken tonight. I believe it is also available on pay per view. I’m going to watch it in DC tonight.[/quote]

Thanks for the heads up Arraya, trying to scout out a friend right now to go see it.

[Ricechex]

[quote=Arraya]Heck, the world gave a peace prize to the man responsible for starting a war and dropping the most bombs and killing the most people. It does not get weirder than that.

War is peace
Debt is wealth

sane is crazy…haha

On a lighter note. Check out the movie Collapse. It happens to be about a man that has shares a lot of my views. Or to put anther way, he put a lot of things together that I have concluded independently.

Roger Ebert gave it four stars.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091209/REVIEWS/912099993

If this man is correct, then you may be reading the most important story in today’s paper.

I have no way of assuring you that the bleak version of the future outlined by Michael Ruppert in Chris Smith’s “Collapse” is accurate. I can only tell you I have a pretty good built-in B.S. detector, and its needle never bounced off zero while I watched this film. There is controversy over Ruppert, and he has many critics. But one simple fact at the center of his argument is obviously true, and it terrifies me.

“I don’t know when I’ve seen a thriller more frightening. I couldn’t tear my eyes from the screen. “Collapse” is even entertaining, in a macabre sense. I think you owe it to yourself to see it

Trailer

http://www.collapsemovie.com/COLLAPSEMOVIE/

It’s playing at the Ken tonight. I believe it is also available on pay per view. I’m going to watch it in DC tonight.[/quote]

Thanks for the heads up Arraya, trying to scout out a friend right now to go see it.

[Author]

Posts