[peterb]

From an investment point of view, there seems to be good sales activity in the sub $400K range. This is what I’ve heard from several completely unrelated sources. If this is the case, money could be made flipping in this catagory given your buy price is low enough. But buying and holding has quite a bit more downside risk at this time. IMO.

[peterb]

From an investment point of view, there seems to be good sales activity in the sub $400K range. This is what I’ve heard from several completely unrelated sources. If this is the case, money could be made flipping in this catagory given your buy price is low enough. But buying and holding has quite a bit more downside risk at this time. IMO.

[peterb]

From an investment point of view, there seems to be good sales activity in the sub $400K range. This is what I’ve heard from several completely unrelated sources. If this is the case, money could be made flipping in this catagory given your buy price is low enough. But buying and holding has quite a bit more downside risk at this time. IMO.

[peterb]

From an investment point of view, there seems to be good sales activity in the sub $400K range. This is what I’ve heard from several completely unrelated sources. If this is the case, money could be made flipping in this catagory given your buy price is low enough. But buying and holding has quite a bit more downside risk at this time. IMO.

[peterb]

The last couple of gigantic credit bubble bursts saw the senior currency rise in strength for at least one to two years after the contraction starts. The US$ seems to be right on track for this to play out for another year or so. This credit destruction looks to be at least $50T in size, which far out wieghs the $3T plus so far being pumped in. Deflation and a strong US$ will probably last a lot longer than most people think. As unemployment rises and credit continues to be constricted around the world, there will be more demand destruction. All these factors and historic evidence point towards this scenario lasting for a minimum of one to two more years. Perhaps a lot longer.

[peterb]

The last couple of gigantic credit bubble bursts saw the senior currency rise in strength for at least one to two years after the contraction starts. The US$ seems to be right on track for this to play out for another year or so. This credit destruction looks to be at least $50T in size, which far out wieghs the $3T plus so far being pumped in. Deflation and a strong US$ will probably last a lot longer than most people think. As unemployment rises and credit continues to be constricted around the world, there will be more demand destruction. All these factors and historic evidence point towards this scenario lasting for a minimum of one to two more years. Perhaps a lot longer.

[peterb]

The last couple of gigantic credit bubble bursts saw the senior currency rise in strength for at least one to two years after the contraction starts. The US$ seems to be right on track for this to play out for another year or so. This credit destruction looks to be at least $50T in size, which far out wieghs the $3T plus so far being pumped in. Deflation and a strong US$ will probably last a lot longer than most people think. As unemployment rises and credit continues to be constricted around the world, there will be more demand destruction. All these factors and historic evidence point towards this scenario lasting for a minimum of one to two more years. Perhaps a lot longer.

[peterb]

The last couple of gigantic credit bubble bursts saw the senior currency rise in strength for at least one to two years after the contraction starts. The US$ seems to be right on track for this to play out for another year or so. This credit destruction looks to be at least $50T in size, which far out wieghs the $3T plus so far being pumped in. Deflation and a strong US$ will probably last a lot longer than most people think. As unemployment rises and credit continues to be constricted around the world, there will be more demand destruction. All these factors and historic evidence point towards this scenario lasting for a minimum of one to two more years. Perhaps a lot longer.

[peterb]

The last couple of gigantic credit bubble bursts saw the senior currency rise in strength for at least one to two years after the contraction starts. The US$ seems to be right on track for this to play out for another year or so. This credit destruction looks to be at least $50T in size, which far out wieghs the $3T plus so far being pumped in. Deflation and a strong US$ will probably last a lot longer than most people think. As unemployment rises and credit continues to be constricted around the world, there will be more demand destruction. All these factors and historic evidence point towards this scenario lasting for a minimum of one to two more years. Perhaps a lot longer.

[peterb]

If the assets were earned by both of you, then you’re taking what’s not yours. That could be thought of as a kind of theft. It’s too bad about the relationship, but that’s not the issue here. It’s about the money. It doesnt pay to confuse your shared assets with your emotional issues. They’re different issues.

[peterb]

If the assets were earned by both of you, then you’re taking what’s not yours. That could be thought of as a kind of theft. It’s too bad about the relationship, but that’s not the issue here. It’s about the money. It doesnt pay to confuse your shared assets with your emotional issues. They’re different issues.

[peterb]

If the assets were earned by both of you, then you’re taking what’s not yours. That could be thought of as a kind of theft. It’s too bad about the relationship, but that’s not the issue here. It’s about the money. It doesnt pay to confuse your shared assets with your emotional issues. They’re different issues.

[peterb]

If the assets were earned by both of you, then you’re taking what’s not yours. That could be thought of as a kind of theft. It’s too bad about the relationship, but that’s not the issue here. It’s about the money. It doesnt pay to confuse your shared assets with your emotional issues. They’re different issues.

[peterb]

If the assets were earned by both of you, then you’re taking what’s not yours. That could be thought of as a kind of theft. It’s too bad about the relationship, but that’s not the issue here. It’s about the money. It doesnt pay to confuse your shared assets with your emotional issues. They’re different issues.

[peterb]

APMEX works for me.

[Author]

Posts