Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
pencilneckParticipant
Just my 2 cents regarding the question “whats taking so long?”
a 10% drop in the price of median homes and a 30% drop in sales, year over year, is a huge and fast drop in a market that is perceived to be so stable. Housing market busts historically take place over years rather than months. Personally, I’m amazed at how fast market sentiment is changing.
pencilneckParticipantJust my 2 cents regarding the question “whats taking so long?”
a 10% drop in the price of median homes and a 30% drop in sales, year over year, is a huge and fast drop in a market that is perceived to be so stable. Housing market busts historically take place over years rather than months. Personally, I’m amazed at how fast market sentiment is changing.
October 12, 2006 at 11:50 AM in reply to: Has Price-to-Annualized Rent Ever Been Normal in San Diego? #37769pencilneckParticipantGreat chart!
While I agree with most people here that that 94-96 was the trough of the last real estate market cycle, 88-89 was very close (if not exactly) the previous top. Thus I disagree with the statements that the chart is merely showing gains from the previous bottom, as it shows quite a bit of the previous top.
pencilneckParticipantIf this is a dead cat bounce, which I think it is, the bounce happens to be right on long term support according to this long term look at the House Builders index as seen on this CNN Finance page. (Sorry for the long link)
To make a prediction, this rally will break down again next year.
pencilneckParticipantAlthough, to play devil’s advocate to myself, perhaps your friend was taking a larger than regional view, such as a national view or global view of the market.
Even still, I doubt this is the case.
pencilneckParticipantpencilneckParticipantA similar cottage close to the one I currently live in sold last year (at the peak) for $600,000. The cottage I rent is larger and in a nicer neighborhood with a bigger yard. I pay $900 (includes a gardener and water bill).
September 24, 2006 at 12:42 PM in reply to: Two Sunday front page articles in Union Trib regarding condos #36233pencilneckParticipantI found the Second article featured on he front page regarding condos. Not a pretty headline:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20060924/news_1n24finance.html
Financial picture gloomy for those holding properties
By Mike Freeman
STAFF WRITERSeptember 24, 2006
When The Heights in Carmel Valley converted from apartments to condominiums last year, the owners renovated 150 of the 225 units, thinking they’d sell fast.
It hasn’t turned out that way. The Heights has sold just 80 condos, according to county deed records filed through August. Only 18 of those sold in 2006. At that pace, it could take three more years for The Heights to sell completely.
pencilneckParticipantChris J, I’m an avid reader of your site and your commentary, and have been waiting for an oppurtunity to say thanks. So thank you!
I have been meaning to ask what service you use to get your data/charts?
August 28, 2006 at 1:25 PM in reply to: “A History of Home Values” graph by Robert J. Schiller #33735pencilneckParticipantThis chart also shows that the current real estate boom as starting in 1997. This seems to contradict the theory that the current housing boom was created by investors fleeing the stock market.
It does, however, add strength to the argument that the booms (bubbles) in the stock market and the housing markets were created by the same loosening of the credit markets. The housing market had a more sluggish response to the stimulus.
Great chart. Thanks for posting svferris!
pencilneckParticipantIts actually Talk of the Nation, and the discussion will be the end of the housing boom.
pencilneckParticipantGreat call, UTC! I was wondering if that was someone who read Piggington’s.
These Day’s at 11:00 am will also be real estate related, sorry I can’t recall the exact topic.
Just fyi to all of those KPBS listeners out there.
August 7, 2006 at 12:56 PM in reply to: San Diego County Assessor Promotes Buying Real Estate #31099pencilneckParticipantDaniel,
You’re right on about that quote. I thought he had advocated ARMS, but in re-reading the speech while he does not uniquivically advocate variable rate mortgages, Greesnpan does seem to imply that these are the best option for consumers
For example:
“American consumers might benefit if lenders provided greater mortgage product alternatives to the traditional fixed-rate mortgage. To the degree that households are driven by fears of payment shocks but are willing to manage their own interest rate risks, the traditional fixed-rate mortgage may be an expensive method of financing a home.”
But you’re absolutely right that the media made a frenzy over the implication of his statements rather than paying much heed to the message itself.
August 7, 2006 at 12:24 PM in reply to: San Diego County Assessor Promotes Buying Real Estate #31094pencilneckParticipantWasn’t it just 2004 or so that Alan Greenspan was urging Americans to use variable rate mortgages? This seems minor in comparison…
-
AuthorPosts