[patb]

[quote=Jumby]My company just brokered a $1.5 million dollar NPN. New home builder went under in Mississippi, 35 homes. 85% of them completely done, with appraised value at $95k a piece being conservative. They also were GO Zone qualified. The investor made out….and so did I for brokering the deal.

I learned the biz thanks to this guy Dean who I personally vouch for…

http://tinyurl.com/y8jysc5

P.S. Don’t be turned off by his direct response marketing, his program is legit and right now is a perfect time to be on top of this.[/quote]

risk is proportionate to reward.

You want returns, take on risks.

[patb]

In Vino Veritas.

He had one or two, was tired and was very
annoyed that the 3 senators he cut a deal with
knuclkled under to their leadership.

[patb]

In Vino Veritas.

He had one or two, was tired and was very
annoyed that the 3 senators he cut a deal with
knuclkled under to their leadership.

[patb]

In Vino Veritas.

He had one or two, was tired and was very
annoyed that the 3 senators he cut a deal with
knuclkled under to their leadership.

[patb]

In Vino Veritas.

He had one or two, was tired and was very
annoyed that the 3 senators he cut a deal with
knuclkled under to their leadership.

[patb]

In Vino Veritas.

He had one or two, was tired and was very
annoyed that the 3 senators he cut a deal with
knuclkled under to their leadership.

[patb]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=pertinazzio]anything that costs money can’t be a right. for instance the poorest possible society can grant all their citizens the right to free speech, association, religion etc. no matter how poor the society, the citizens can still have exercise those rights. on the other hand if in very poor societies you grant a right to universal high quality education, health-care, nutrition no will be able to exercise their so-called rights for a lack of resouces. now a society may decide that decency requires it to give all citizens health care, a job, etc. but that supposes society has the wherewithall to provide those things. Real rights are independent of society’s wealth.[/quote]

That is a very good point.

I find it compelling as a way of evaluating rights.

For example it is reasonable to describe equality of access to a public service as a right but not the access itself.
So we have a right to equal treatment when trying to get education but not a right to the education per se.[/quote]

“You have a right to an attorney, if you cannot afford one, the court will appoint one for you”

[patb]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=pertinazzio]anything that costs money can’t be a right. for instance the poorest possible society can grant all their citizens the right to free speech, association, religion etc. no matter how poor the society, the citizens can still have exercise those rights. on the other hand if in very poor societies you grant a right to universal high quality education, health-care, nutrition no will be able to exercise their so-called rights for a lack of resouces. now a society may decide that decency requires it to give all citizens health care, a job, etc. but that supposes society has the wherewithall to provide those things. Real rights are independent of society’s wealth.[/quote]

That is a very good point.

I find it compelling as a way of evaluating rights.

For example it is reasonable to describe equality of access to a public service as a right but not the access itself.
So we have a right to equal treatment when trying to get education but not a right to the education per se.[/quote]

“You have a right to an attorney, if you cannot afford one, the court will appoint one for you”

[patb]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=pertinazzio]anything that costs money can’t be a right. for instance the poorest possible society can grant all their citizens the right to free speech, association, religion etc. no matter how poor the society, the citizens can still have exercise those rights. on the other hand if in very poor societies you grant a right to universal high quality education, health-care, nutrition no will be able to exercise their so-called rights for a lack of resouces. now a society may decide that decency requires it to give all citizens health care, a job, etc. but that supposes society has the wherewithall to provide those things. Real rights are independent of society’s wealth.[/quote]

That is a very good point.

I find it compelling as a way of evaluating rights.

For example it is reasonable to describe equality of access to a public service as a right but not the access itself.
So we have a right to equal treatment when trying to get education but not a right to the education per se.[/quote]

“You have a right to an attorney, if you cannot afford one, the court will appoint one for you”

[patb]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=pertinazzio]anything that costs money can’t be a right. for instance the poorest possible society can grant all their citizens the right to free speech, association, religion etc. no matter how poor the society, the citizens can still have exercise those rights. on the other hand if in very poor societies you grant a right to universal high quality education, health-care, nutrition no will be able to exercise their so-called rights for a lack of resouces. now a society may decide that decency requires it to give all citizens health care, a job, etc. but that supposes society has the wherewithall to provide those things. Real rights are independent of society’s wealth.[/quote]

That is a very good point.

I find it compelling as a way of evaluating rights.

For example it is reasonable to describe equality of access to a public service as a right but not the access itself.
So we have a right to equal treatment when trying to get education but not a right to the education per se.[/quote]

“You have a right to an attorney, if you cannot afford one, the court will appoint one for you”

[patb]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=pertinazzio]anything that costs money can’t be a right. for instance the poorest possible society can grant all their citizens the right to free speech, association, religion etc. no matter how poor the society, the citizens can still have exercise those rights. on the other hand if in very poor societies you grant a right to universal high quality education, health-care, nutrition no will be able to exercise their so-called rights for a lack of resouces. now a society may decide that decency requires it to give all citizens health care, a job, etc. but that supposes society has the wherewithall to provide those things. Real rights are independent of society’s wealth.[/quote]

That is a very good point.

I find it compelling as a way of evaluating rights.

For example it is reasonable to describe equality of access to a public service as a right but not the access itself.
So we have a right to equal treatment when trying to get education but not a right to the education per se.[/quote]

“You have a right to an attorney, if you cannot afford one, the court will appoint one for you”

[patb]

[quote=Carl Veritas]Your right ends where someone else’s right begins.

No one should go hungry, but —

Since the government does not produce anything,
[/quote]

The government produces nothing?

By Definition the government produces public goods
ranging from parks to sidewalks to national defense.

The free market sure didn’t produce I-5.

[patb]

[quote=Carl Veritas]Your right ends where someone else’s right begins.

No one should go hungry, but —

Since the government does not produce anything,
[/quote]

The government produces nothing?

By Definition the government produces public goods
ranging from parks to sidewalks to national defense.

The free market sure didn’t produce I-5.

[patb]

[quote=Carl Veritas]Your right ends where someone else’s right begins.

No one should go hungry, but —

Since the government does not produce anything,
[/quote]

The government produces nothing?

By Definition the government produces public goods
ranging from parks to sidewalks to national defense.

The free market sure didn’t produce I-5.

[patb]

[quote=Carl Veritas]Your right ends where someone else’s right begins.

No one should go hungry, but —

Since the government does not produce anything,
[/quote]

The government produces nothing?

By Definition the government produces public goods
ranging from parks to sidewalks to national defense.

The free market sure didn’t produce I-5.

[Author]

Posts