Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 18, 2013 at 9:19 PM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768132
paramount
Participant[quote=SK in CV] Hence, you’re homophobic. I’m not sure why you won’t just acknowledge it. Your words make it pretty clear.[/quote]
It’s amazing how deeply the gay agenda has brainwashed the masses.
The message is: If you don’t agree with or embrace my view of homosexuality or how it’s being taught, you must be a homophobe and a hater. Or a troll. Or whatever.
Stop imposing your secular progressive religion on others.
Why not learn to exercise some tolerance for the views others might have without the need for personal attacks.
November 17, 2013 at 11:30 AM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768074paramount
Participant[quote=ctr70]
How about worrying about something that really matters like teachers pay and job stability to be based on student performance?[/quote]
With a ridiculous comment like that, you’re the one that’s kidding.
paramount
ParticipantAwesome speech/comic.
Someone who really ‘get’s it’ IMO.
November 16, 2013 at 9:32 PM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768043paramount
Participant[quote=6packscaredy]
No probably he meant having kids be aware of homosexuality is immoral.
But that can’t be right because we must teach our children Torah, and so they will learn of homosexualitys existence there…[/quote]
Teaching young children (elem age) in a school about matters regarding hetero/homo relationships is immoral, period. The comments I’m reading here are VERY disturbing. Is this a NMBLA Board in disguise?
Torah? Well, it can’t be any worse than the Mark Swift Manifesto so many here obviously worship.
November 16, 2013 at 7:31 PM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768024paramount
Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=paramount]
So you don’t think mommy and daddy should ever be discussed either?Parent(s) or Guardian(s) works just fine.[/quote]
Unless parents happen to both be men or both be women. Hence, you’re homophobic. I’m not sure why you won’t just acknowledge it. Your words make it pretty clear.[/quote]
What? You’re making no sense at all.
Let me say it again: Regardless of the home arrangement, parent(s) or guardian(s) at all times.
Gay Marriage (or any marriage for that matter): It’s none of my business who marries who – but don’t talk to my elementary school age kid about it in any official public capacity.
BTW, I really don’t care what you label me at all.
Seriously, I don’t.
November 16, 2013 at 7:01 PM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768022paramount
Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=paramount]
It just goes to show how far down the rat hole society is when you can’t take a position that:No form of gender relationship issues of any type should be discussed or even suggested to elementary school children.
Again: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN!!
Without being labeled a homophobe.
Sick. Really Sick.[/quote]
So you don’t think mommy and daddy should ever be discussed either?[/quote]
Parent(s) or Guardian(s) works just fine.
November 16, 2013 at 6:52 PM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768020paramount
Participant[quote=Rich Toscano][quote=paramount]
Caution: The following video could be disturbing to those with a conscious/morals.
[/quote]Yeah, good thing you’re not homophobic.[/quote]
It just goes to show how far down the rat hole society is when you can’t take a position that:
No form of gender relationship issues of any type should be discussed or even suggested to elementary school children.
Again: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN!!
Without being labeled a homophobe.
Sick. Really Sick.
November 16, 2013 at 6:36 PM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768019paramount
ParticipantAnother very disturbing video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3zEC97E2kw
That is NOT a discussion Elementary School age children should be having @ school.
No Way!!
November 16, 2013 at 6:24 PM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768018paramount
ParticipantHoly Shit – I guess I shouldn’t be surprised about the comments….
I’M TALKING ABOUT – IN MANY CASES – 5 YEAR OLD KIDS!!!
IS NOTHING SACRED??
SOME OF YOU COMMENTATORS ARE REALLY SICK IN THE HEAD!!!
November 16, 2013 at 5:24 PM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768014paramount
ParticipantThese innocent *very young* children being subjected to the gay agenda:
Caution: The following video could be disturbing to those with a conscious/morals.
November 16, 2013 at 4:38 PM in reply to: OT: The “Radical” Gay Agenda in California Public Schools #768011paramount
Participant[quote=Rich Toscano]Passing mention of a same-sex couple = “radical gay agenda”[/quote]
Seems innocent and subtle; it’s anything but…
Kids can’t live in a bubble forever, but I want to decide how and when to teach my children about any sexuality (regardless of how subtle the suggestion is….) prior to Jr. High in particular.
Gay Literature is being presented to innocent children in California starting in Kindergarten (ie. Harvey Milk) and 1st grade. I call that Radical.
I call that Social Engineering.
Sadly, this agenda will spread Nationwide.
Private/Charter Schools: Now More than Ever…
paramount
ParticipantAlso, keep in mind money really isn’t an issue for the govt at any level. They just shoot to kill – justified or not – and then print as needed. Rinse and Repeat.
paramount
ParticipantI am so sad for those 2 innocent women torrance police almost killed.
They will be traumatized for the rest of their life because of trigger happy cops. When one of their own gets killed they will stop at nothing to kill and go after the person who did it. It doesn’t matter who has to get hurt or get killed along the way. Does this sound familiar? If so its because it is, this is the way of gangbangers.
Should a civilian get killed, nobody cares, its just a body. But if its a police officer its absolutely war. The police officers who shot to kill those 2 women should be charged with attempted murder, spend many years in jail or life in jail and never be allowed to work as a cop again.
November 11, 2013 at 7:51 PM in reply to: Anyone have a property manager recommendation in L.A. #767786paramount
Participant[quote=flu]
Do you DIY and list yourself or use someone?
I recall you mentioned you had a bad experience with a property management company one time.. I’m assuming this isn’t that one 🙂[/quote]
Yes, I had a bad experience. The company was RPM Titanium.
For my current tenant I hired a friend experienced in PM issues for screening and used craigslist, and then I took it over from that point once the tenant was moved in. To date I’ve had no issues at all.
-
AuthorPosts
