[ocrenter]

[quote=mdk]the comp killer recently closed

http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090031679-15595_S_Rising_River_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92127

-mdk[/quote]

15595 S Rising River Pl
–4,464sqft
–listing price: $899,900
–sold price: $882,500
–price/sqft: $198

just re-read some of the comments back in ’08 about price drops down to $1.1 million. I say $882k is pretty much bottom and at 2000 pricing. not saying everyone can get the price, but this once again shows that Eugene and I were not the only two that got homes at 2000 pricing:

17257 Silver Gum Way, San Diego, CA 92127
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,128 sq ft
–12/05/2000: $815,500

17269 Silver Gum Way, San Diego, CA 92127
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,450 sq ft
–11/09/2000: $946,000

9446 Tea Tree Ln, San Diego, CA 92127
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 4,790 sq ft
–11/14/2000: $894,500

9433 Tea Tree Ln, San Diego, CA 92127
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,128 sq ft
–11/28/2000: $817,000

[ocrenter]

[quote=mdk]the comp killer recently closed

http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-090031679-15595_S_Rising_River_Pl_San_Diego_CA_92127

-mdk[/quote]

15595 S Rising River Pl
–4,464sqft
–listing price: $899,900
–sold price: $882,500
–price/sqft: $198

just re-read some of the comments back in ’08 about price drops down to $1.1 million. I say $882k is pretty much bottom and at 2000 pricing. not saying everyone can get the price, but this once again shows that Eugene and I were not the only two that got homes at 2000 pricing:

17257 Silver Gum Way, San Diego, CA 92127
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,128 sq ft
–12/05/2000: $815,500

17269 Silver Gum Way, San Diego, CA 92127
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,450 sq ft
–11/09/2000: $946,000

9446 Tea Tree Ln, San Diego, CA 92127
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 4,790 sq ft
–11/14/2000: $894,500

9433 Tea Tree Ln, San Diego, CA 92127
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,128 sq ft
–11/28/2000: $817,000

[ocrenter]

[quote=outtamojo]For those of you who think Advanced Directives mean something here are some things to chew on :

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/12/02/IN221010.DTL

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=21677%5B/quote%5D

First thing that’s wrong with the sfgate link: “She once told you that no matter what happenED, she wants to live.”

This is problem #1. The patient is coming in with unrealistic expectation. NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENED. under this Directive, if she is completely comatosed and unresponsive, the Hospital NEED to continue her care.

And a lot of hospitals DO, and there lies the problem. WE now have the ability to keep folks alive for an indefinite amount of time. Absolutely we do. The pressure is down, no worries, doctors add one presser after another, sure multiple pressers might induce gangrene of fingers, but if that means to preserve the blood pressure, it can be done. Respiratory failure? no, worries, ventilator care has been perfected to an art form. What about the heart? there’s always a pacemaker. Add a feeding tube, some fluids, stick in a catheter for your bladder and bowel needs, you are all set to LIVE NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS.

And this kind of care is done, especially at places like Cedar Sinai and UCLA where the super-rich go. You want this type of care? go for it, just not on my dime.

for every couple of articles from the “lifers” I can show you ten articles that demonstrate Hospice is way under-utilized. The average patient on Hospice care is there for less than 1-2 weeks. In reality if Hospice was utilized the right way, it should be 3-4 months.

The articles make it sound like doctors are rushing to put folks on Hospice. In reality, it is the other way around.

[ocrenter]

[quote=outtamojo]For those of you who think Advanced Directives mean something here are some things to chew on :

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/12/02/IN221010.DTL

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=21677%5B/quote%5D

First thing that’s wrong with the sfgate link: “She once told you that no matter what happenED, she wants to live.”

This is problem #1. The patient is coming in with unrealistic expectation. NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENED. under this Directive, if she is completely comatosed and unresponsive, the Hospital NEED to continue her care.

And a lot of hospitals DO, and there lies the problem. WE now have the ability to keep folks alive for an indefinite amount of time. Absolutely we do. The pressure is down, no worries, doctors add one presser after another, sure multiple pressers might induce gangrene of fingers, but if that means to preserve the blood pressure, it can be done. Respiratory failure? no, worries, ventilator care has been perfected to an art form. What about the heart? there’s always a pacemaker. Add a feeding tube, some fluids, stick in a catheter for your bladder and bowel needs, you are all set to LIVE NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS.

And this kind of care is done, especially at places like Cedar Sinai and UCLA where the super-rich go. You want this type of care? go for it, just not on my dime.

for every couple of articles from the “lifers” I can show you ten articles that demonstrate Hospice is way under-utilized. The average patient on Hospice care is there for less than 1-2 weeks. In reality if Hospice was utilized the right way, it should be 3-4 months.

The articles make it sound like doctors are rushing to put folks on Hospice. In reality, it is the other way around.

[ocrenter]

[quote=outtamojo]For those of you who think Advanced Directives mean something here are some things to chew on :

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/12/02/IN221010.DTL

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=21677%5B/quote%5D

First thing that’s wrong with the sfgate link: “She once told you that no matter what happenED, she wants to live.”

This is problem #1. The patient is coming in with unrealistic expectation. NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENED. under this Directive, if she is completely comatosed and unresponsive, the Hospital NEED to continue her care.

And a lot of hospitals DO, and there lies the problem. WE now have the ability to keep folks alive for an indefinite amount of time. Absolutely we do. The pressure is down, no worries, doctors add one presser after another, sure multiple pressers might induce gangrene of fingers, but if that means to preserve the blood pressure, it can be done. Respiratory failure? no, worries, ventilator care has been perfected to an art form. What about the heart? there’s always a pacemaker. Add a feeding tube, some fluids, stick in a catheter for your bladder and bowel needs, you are all set to LIVE NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS.

And this kind of care is done, especially at places like Cedar Sinai and UCLA where the super-rich go. You want this type of care? go for it, just not on my dime.

for every couple of articles from the “lifers” I can show you ten articles that demonstrate Hospice is way under-utilized. The average patient on Hospice care is there for less than 1-2 weeks. In reality if Hospice was utilized the right way, it should be 3-4 months.

The articles make it sound like doctors are rushing to put folks on Hospice. In reality, it is the other way around.

[ocrenter]

[quote=outtamojo]For those of you who think Advanced Directives mean something here are some things to chew on :

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/12/02/IN221010.DTL

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=21677%5B/quote%5D

First thing that’s wrong with the sfgate link: “She once told you that no matter what happenED, she wants to live.”

This is problem #1. The patient is coming in with unrealistic expectation. NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENED. under this Directive, if she is completely comatosed and unresponsive, the Hospital NEED to continue her care.

And a lot of hospitals DO, and there lies the problem. WE now have the ability to keep folks alive for an indefinite amount of time. Absolutely we do. The pressure is down, no worries, doctors add one presser after another, sure multiple pressers might induce gangrene of fingers, but if that means to preserve the blood pressure, it can be done. Respiratory failure? no, worries, ventilator care has been perfected to an art form. What about the heart? there’s always a pacemaker. Add a feeding tube, some fluids, stick in a catheter for your bladder and bowel needs, you are all set to LIVE NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS.

And this kind of care is done, especially at places like Cedar Sinai and UCLA where the super-rich go. You want this type of care? go for it, just not on my dime.

for every couple of articles from the “lifers” I can show you ten articles that demonstrate Hospice is way under-utilized. The average patient on Hospice care is there for less than 1-2 weeks. In reality if Hospice was utilized the right way, it should be 3-4 months.

The articles make it sound like doctors are rushing to put folks on Hospice. In reality, it is the other way around.

[ocrenter]

[quote=outtamojo]For those of you who think Advanced Directives mean something here are some things to chew on :

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/12/02/IN221010.DTL

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=21677%5B/quote%5D

First thing that’s wrong with the sfgate link: “She once told you that no matter what happenED, she wants to live.”

This is problem #1. The patient is coming in with unrealistic expectation. NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENED. under this Directive, if she is completely comatosed and unresponsive, the Hospital NEED to continue her care.

And a lot of hospitals DO, and there lies the problem. WE now have the ability to keep folks alive for an indefinite amount of time. Absolutely we do. The pressure is down, no worries, doctors add one presser after another, sure multiple pressers might induce gangrene of fingers, but if that means to preserve the blood pressure, it can be done. Respiratory failure? no, worries, ventilator care has been perfected to an art form. What about the heart? there’s always a pacemaker. Add a feeding tube, some fluids, stick in a catheter for your bladder and bowel needs, you are all set to LIVE NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS.

And this kind of care is done, especially at places like Cedar Sinai and UCLA where the super-rich go. You want this type of care? go for it, just not on my dime.

for every couple of articles from the “lifers” I can show you ten articles that demonstrate Hospice is way under-utilized. The average patient on Hospice care is there for less than 1-2 weeks. In reality if Hospice was utilized the right way, it should be 3-4 months.

The articles make it sound like doctors are rushing to put folks on Hospice. In reality, it is the other way around.

[ocrenter]

Allan, absolutely. I want diligence and deliberation. but that’s not what I see the GOP doing. just seem like there’s a lot of fear-mongering to kill the bill.

[ocrenter]

Allan, absolutely. I want diligence and deliberation. but that’s not what I see the GOP doing. just seem like there’s a lot of fear-mongering to kill the bill.

[ocrenter]

Allan, absolutely. I want diligence and deliberation. but that’s not what I see the GOP doing. just seem like there’s a lot of fear-mongering to kill the bill.

[ocrenter]

Allan, absolutely. I want diligence and deliberation. but that’s not what I see the GOP doing. just seem like there’s a lot of fear-mongering to kill the bill.

[ocrenter]

Allan, absolutely. I want diligence and deliberation. but that’s not what I see the GOP doing. just seem like there’s a lot of fear-mongering to kill the bill.

[ocrenter]

List Price: $929,000
Sold Price: $951,000
Sale Date: 08/07/2009
PPSF: $250

[ocrenter]

List Price: $929,000
Sold Price: $951,000
Sale Date: 08/07/2009
PPSF: $250

[ocrenter]

List Price: $929,000
Sold Price: $951,000
Sale Date: 08/07/2009
PPSF: $250

[Author]

Posts