Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
NotCranky
Participant1)Democrats realize they have been over-confident about 2008.
2) “Big Chunk” the sequel comes out in a housing market near you.
Participant1)Democrats realize they have been over-confident about 2008.
2) “Big Chunk” the sequel comes out in a housing market near you.
Participant1)Democrats realize they have been over-confident about 2008.
2) “Big Chunk” the sequel comes out in a housing market near you.
Participant1)Democrats realize they have been over-confident about 2008.
2) “Big Chunk” the sequel comes out in a housing market near you.
Participant1)Democrats realize they have been over-confident about 2008.
2) “Big Chunk” the sequel comes out in a housing market near you.
ParticipantJust messing around Allan. I am concerned that your prefered method for installing drunkle would not be bloodless and in any case, would create a dynamic tension that given your vast knowlege of history must assume that blood will be spilled eventually.
What’s up with that?
ParticipantJust messing around Allan. I am concerned that your prefered method for installing drunkle would not be bloodless and in any case, would create a dynamic tension that given your vast knowlege of history must assume that blood will be spilled eventually.
What’s up with that?
ParticipantJust messing around Allan. I am concerned that your prefered method for installing drunkle would not be bloodless and in any case, would create a dynamic tension that given your vast knowlege of history must assume that blood will be spilled eventually.
What’s up with that?
ParticipantJust messing around Allan. I am concerned that your prefered method for installing drunkle would not be bloodless and in any case, would create a dynamic tension that given your vast knowlege of history must assume that blood will be spilled eventually.
What’s up with that?
ParticipantJust messing around Allan. I am concerned that your prefered method for installing drunkle would not be bloodless and in any case, would create a dynamic tension that given your vast knowlege of history must assume that blood will be spilled eventually.
What’s up with that?
ParticipantThink about that for a moment; and then ask yourself whether you would be willing to vote for a Catholic…
Why not? I think a persons faith is not automatically a big issue. If a candidate panders and plys believers that is a big strike against them in my book. Rejection of equal political representation, on the basis religious opinion, however superior in the soundness of its derivation, is a failure on the part of the politician who practices that way.
I am not against atheism either but from what I have seen atheists are not generally speaking evolved significantly so that rule by them would make things better. Main benefit would be no religious schizms to ply domestically or internationally.Being what we are we would probably try to force the world to comply with our national atheism and find them coming up short so that we could justify taking their lives, oil or whatever. Didn’t someone do that already?
Somebody pass me a bottle!
ParticipantThink about that for a moment; and then ask yourself whether you would be willing to vote for a Catholic…
Why not? I think a persons faith is not automatically a big issue. If a candidate panders and plys believers that is a big strike against them in my book. Rejection of equal political representation, on the basis religious opinion, however superior in the soundness of its derivation, is a failure on the part of the politician who practices that way.
I am not against atheism either but from what I have seen atheists are not generally speaking evolved significantly so that rule by them would make things better. Main benefit would be no religious schizms to ply domestically or internationally.Being what we are we would probably try to force the world to comply with our national atheism and find them coming up short so that we could justify taking their lives, oil or whatever. Didn’t someone do that already?
Somebody pass me a bottle!
ParticipantThink about that for a moment; and then ask yourself whether you would be willing to vote for a Catholic…
Why not? I think a persons faith is not automatically a big issue. If a candidate panders and plys believers that is a big strike against them in my book. Rejection of equal political representation, on the basis religious opinion, however superior in the soundness of its derivation, is a failure on the part of the politician who practices that way.
I am not against atheism either but from what I have seen atheists are not generally speaking evolved significantly so that rule by them would make things better. Main benefit would be no religious schizms to ply domestically or internationally.Being what we are we would probably try to force the world to comply with our national atheism and find them coming up short so that we could justify taking their lives, oil or whatever. Didn’t someone do that already?
Somebody pass me a bottle!
ParticipantThink about that for a moment; and then ask yourself whether you would be willing to vote for a Catholic…
Why not? I think a persons faith is not automatically a big issue. If a candidate panders and plys believers that is a big strike against them in my book. Rejection of equal political representation, on the basis religious opinion, however superior in the soundness of its derivation, is a failure on the part of the politician who practices that way.
I am not against atheism either but from what I have seen atheists are not generally speaking evolved significantly so that rule by them would make things better. Main benefit would be no religious schizms to ply domestically or internationally.Being what we are we would probably try to force the world to comply with our national atheism and find them coming up short so that we could justify taking their lives, oil or whatever. Didn’t someone do that already?
Somebody pass me a bottle!
-
AuthorPosts
