Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
NotCranky
ParticipantSorry to butt in…sdr’s not calling that was accidental JWM. He just wasn’t focused on that market at the time we had that big chunk discussion.He called it right for what he had in mind. It happens to all of us now and again. I have said things that don’t make sense to the high end buyers here because it isn’t usually my focus.
NotCranky
ParticipantSorry to butt in…sdr’s not calling that was accidental JWM. He just wasn’t focused on that market at the time we had that big chunk discussion.He called it right for what he had in mind. It happens to all of us now and again. I have said things that don’t make sense to the high end buyers here because it isn’t usually my focus.
NotCranky
ParticipantSorry to butt in…sdr’s not calling that was accidental JWM. He just wasn’t focused on that market at the time we had that big chunk discussion.He called it right for what he had in mind. It happens to all of us now and again. I have said things that don’t make sense to the high end buyers here because it isn’t usually my focus.
NotCranky
ParticipantThanks contraman, That was all I am saying. I was assuming full doc. is not tough for most piggs. I understand on over inflated assets qualifing in this envornment is tough and probably not a good idea for most with regards to expensive depreciating houses. Sorry if I offended anyone.
Have a great day.NotCranky
ParticipantThanks contraman, That was all I am saying. I was assuming full doc. is not tough for most piggs. I understand on over inflated assets qualifing in this envornment is tough and probably not a good idea for most with regards to expensive depreciating houses. Sorry if I offended anyone.
Have a great day.NotCranky
ParticipantThanks contraman, That was all I am saying. I was assuming full doc. is not tough for most piggs. I understand on over inflated assets qualifing in this envornment is tough and probably not a good idea for most with regards to expensive depreciating houses. Sorry if I offended anyone.
Have a great day.NotCranky
ParticipantThanks contraman, That was all I am saying. I was assuming full doc. is not tough for most piggs. I understand on over inflated assets qualifing in this envornment is tough and probably not a good idea for most with regards to expensive depreciating houses. Sorry if I offended anyone.
Have a great day.NotCranky
ParticipantThanks contraman, That was all I am saying. I was assuming full doc. is not tough for most piggs. I understand on over inflated assets qualifing in this envornment is tough and probably not a good idea for most with regards to expensive depreciating houses. Sorry if I offended anyone.
Have a great day.NotCranky
ParticipantWell, active to pending in 92127 is 101/44 for houses under a million and 154/20 for houses over a million and 5 of those have been in escrow since 2007 and one says it has been there since 2006. I had posted on the Mira Mesa thread that we might see some traffic, but also correspondingly high failed escrows when the spring shakes out. We will see but this doesn’t look good, or bad, depending on your perspective. If I got it right that’s a CRACK. If I were a “must sell” I’d drop price too. This kind of pricing could have another effect…cause people to cancel more escrows. What if they check into piggington’s today? Instant “buyer’s remorse”.I am surprised this site doesn’t get hacked!
CV on the other hand is 59/33 for houses under a million and that is indeed “on fire” for houses over a million it is 116-20.One in escrow since 2007. This is all detached.
The 849k house that records clerk mentioned went into escrow 4/7/08.
NotCranky
ParticipantWell, active to pending in 92127 is 101/44 for houses under a million and 154/20 for houses over a million and 5 of those have been in escrow since 2007 and one says it has been there since 2006. I had posted on the Mira Mesa thread that we might see some traffic, but also correspondingly high failed escrows when the spring shakes out. We will see but this doesn’t look good, or bad, depending on your perspective. If I got it right that’s a CRACK. If I were a “must sell” I’d drop price too. This kind of pricing could have another effect…cause people to cancel more escrows. What if they check into piggington’s today? Instant “buyer’s remorse”.I am surprised this site doesn’t get hacked!
CV on the other hand is 59/33 for houses under a million and that is indeed “on fire” for houses over a million it is 116-20.One in escrow since 2007. This is all detached.
The 849k house that records clerk mentioned went into escrow 4/7/08.
NotCranky
ParticipantWell, active to pending in 92127 is 101/44 for houses under a million and 154/20 for houses over a million and 5 of those have been in escrow since 2007 and one says it has been there since 2006. I had posted on the Mira Mesa thread that we might see some traffic, but also correspondingly high failed escrows when the spring shakes out. We will see but this doesn’t look good, or bad, depending on your perspective. If I got it right that’s a CRACK. If I were a “must sell” I’d drop price too. This kind of pricing could have another effect…cause people to cancel more escrows. What if they check into piggington’s today? Instant “buyer’s remorse”.I am surprised this site doesn’t get hacked!
CV on the other hand is 59/33 for houses under a million and that is indeed “on fire” for houses over a million it is 116-20.One in escrow since 2007. This is all detached.
The 849k house that records clerk mentioned went into escrow 4/7/08.
NotCranky
ParticipantWell, active to pending in 92127 is 101/44 for houses under a million and 154/20 for houses over a million and 5 of those have been in escrow since 2007 and one says it has been there since 2006. I had posted on the Mira Mesa thread that we might see some traffic, but also correspondingly high failed escrows when the spring shakes out. We will see but this doesn’t look good, or bad, depending on your perspective. If I got it right that’s a CRACK. If I were a “must sell” I’d drop price too. This kind of pricing could have another effect…cause people to cancel more escrows. What if they check into piggington’s today? Instant “buyer’s remorse”.I am surprised this site doesn’t get hacked!
CV on the other hand is 59/33 for houses under a million and that is indeed “on fire” for houses over a million it is 116-20.One in escrow since 2007. This is all detached.
The 849k house that records clerk mentioned went into escrow 4/7/08.
NotCranky
ParticipantWell, active to pending in 92127 is 101/44 for houses under a million and 154/20 for houses over a million and 5 of those have been in escrow since 2007 and one says it has been there since 2006. I had posted on the Mira Mesa thread that we might see some traffic, but also correspondingly high failed escrows when the spring shakes out. We will see but this doesn’t look good, or bad, depending on your perspective. If I got it right that’s a CRACK. If I were a “must sell” I’d drop price too. This kind of pricing could have another effect…cause people to cancel more escrows. What if they check into piggington’s today? Instant “buyer’s remorse”.I am surprised this site doesn’t get hacked!
CV on the other hand is 59/33 for houses under a million and that is indeed “on fire” for houses over a million it is 116-20.One in escrow since 2007. This is all detached.
The 849k house that records clerk mentioned went into escrow 4/7/08.
April 8, 2008 at 8:50 AM in reply to: OT: Mexico reconquers California? Absolut drinks to that! #182732NotCranky
Participant“We already have a guest-worker program. It is just not officially sanctioned by the US Government.”
This is the way the guest worker program is sanctioned:
You want to do that grueling labor or shit work for 8 dollars an hour? “Be my guest”. -
AuthorPosts
