Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
NotCranky
Participant“One option I was considering is waiting two more years, then renting my place out while I pick up a new place to live.”
Very sound strategy. Allied Gardens , and that house, should treat you very well as a investor/landlord.
NotCranky
Participant“One option I was considering is waiting two more years, then renting my place out while I pick up a new place to live.”
Very sound strategy. Allied Gardens , and that house, should treat you very well as a investor/landlord.
NotCranky
Participant“One option I was considering is waiting two more years, then renting my place out while I pick up a new place to live.”
Very sound strategy. Allied Gardens , and that house, should treat you very well as a investor/landlord.
NotCranky
Participant“One option I was considering is waiting two more years, then renting my place out while I pick up a new place to live.”
Very sound strategy. Allied Gardens , and that house, should treat you very well as a investor/landlord.
NotCranky
ParticipantThe moral dilema for me would be holding on to the concept of buying a 3.5M house and working for a living simultaneously, in any market, let alone a precarious one.
That is Just me.It is never too late to challange your wife’s values either. Buy what you can afford to pay cash for and tell her you will move up as you can afford to, then tell her that will most likely come quicker if she shops less.
bsrsharma, Don’t you agree that a 3.5M house is a luxury Item and people should pay cash for that? I mean if it is true about a Jacuzzi why not a house that exceeds average needs?
NotCranky
ParticipantThe moral dilema for me would be holding on to the concept of buying a 3.5M house and working for a living simultaneously, in any market, let alone a precarious one.
That is Just me.It is never too late to challange your wife’s values either. Buy what you can afford to pay cash for and tell her you will move up as you can afford to, then tell her that will most likely come quicker if she shops less.
bsrsharma, Don’t you agree that a 3.5M house is a luxury Item and people should pay cash for that? I mean if it is true about a Jacuzzi why not a house that exceeds average needs?
NotCranky
ParticipantThe moral dilema for me would be holding on to the concept of buying a 3.5M house and working for a living simultaneously, in any market, let alone a precarious one.
That is Just me.It is never too late to challange your wife’s values either. Buy what you can afford to pay cash for and tell her you will move up as you can afford to, then tell her that will most likely come quicker if she shops less.
bsrsharma, Don’t you agree that a 3.5M house is a luxury Item and people should pay cash for that? I mean if it is true about a Jacuzzi why not a house that exceeds average needs?
NotCranky
ParticipantThe moral dilema for me would be holding on to the concept of buying a 3.5M house and working for a living simultaneously, in any market, let alone a precarious one.
That is Just me.It is never too late to challange your wife’s values either. Buy what you can afford to pay cash for and tell her you will move up as you can afford to, then tell her that will most likely come quicker if she shops less.
bsrsharma, Don’t you agree that a 3.5M house is a luxury Item and people should pay cash for that? I mean if it is true about a Jacuzzi why not a house that exceeds average needs?
October 31, 2007 at 2:31 PM in reply to: 10% population in SD county are millionaires (exclude Primary RE)?! #93820NotCranky
ParticipantAh yes, I got mine, now you go get yours right?
I am not really taking that stance. Just using a personal anecdote to reply to biased anti- Real Estate sentiment. Probably shouldn’t do that.
You can own property at any time you want and it might be a good idea. Those possible options don’t appeal to you.
“If your house is a big piece of your nest egg, then you are relying on people like me to buy it sometime in the future.”
Not really. Yours truly hasn’t ever flipped anything. The properties I have owned previous to this one were mine and the banks) an average of 6.5 years. A low level, working class widow made a small fortune from one of them. Someone who apparently is not as bright as you or even me, bought the other one in the spring of 05.
This property is a big piece of my overall low net worth,it is also splittable. I might give it to my kids developed when I die. If I could not have afforded it here, I was headed for Arkansas..or Prescott AZ. I could sell it and diversify better but that is going away from my strengths and I like life here.The size of it means I could sell a portion or build a rent-able home or 3.The original house with a smaller property, after the split is worth almost as much as it was before the split and the new lot has a ton of potential. besides, meanwhile, I want more money, but I don’t need it. Maybe I’ll end up living on my assets when I am old,or sooner. I don’t find that so unusual be the assets be a pile of cash, stocks or property or a combination.Soliloquy:
I think the point is , investing in RE for comfort and prestige, before you can really afford it doesn’t work well for capitalization, but that doesn’t begin to describe the potential in the asset class. I see many people on this blog who, at least for the time being, see it in the shallow way .Hopefully some of them, especially those that should(the non rich), will see it differently before they pull the trigger regardless of the timing. Sounds grandiose for a slow starting, small fish like me, I know :).
Best wishes for a bright future.
October 31, 2007 at 2:31 PM in reply to: 10% population in SD county are millionaires (exclude Primary RE)?! #93855NotCranky
ParticipantAh yes, I got mine, now you go get yours right?
I am not really taking that stance. Just using a personal anecdote to reply to biased anti- Real Estate sentiment. Probably shouldn’t do that.
You can own property at any time you want and it might be a good idea. Those possible options don’t appeal to you.
“If your house is a big piece of your nest egg, then you are relying on people like me to buy it sometime in the future.”
Not really. Yours truly hasn’t ever flipped anything. The properties I have owned previous to this one were mine and the banks) an average of 6.5 years. A low level, working class widow made a small fortune from one of them. Someone who apparently is not as bright as you or even me, bought the other one in the spring of 05.
This property is a big piece of my overall low net worth,it is also splittable. I might give it to my kids developed when I die. If I could not have afforded it here, I was headed for Arkansas..or Prescott AZ. I could sell it and diversify better but that is going away from my strengths and I like life here.The size of it means I could sell a portion or build a rent-able home or 3.The original house with a smaller property, after the split is worth almost as much as it was before the split and the new lot has a ton of potential. besides, meanwhile, I want more money, but I don’t need it. Maybe I’ll end up living on my assets when I am old,or sooner. I don’t find that so unusual be the assets be a pile of cash, stocks or property or a combination.Soliloquy:
I think the point is , investing in RE for comfort and prestige, before you can really afford it doesn’t work well for capitalization, but that doesn’t begin to describe the potential in the asset class. I see many people on this blog who, at least for the time being, see it in the shallow way .Hopefully some of them, especially those that should(the non rich), will see it differently before they pull the trigger regardless of the timing. Sounds grandiose for a slow starting, small fish like me, I know :).
Best wishes for a bright future.
October 31, 2007 at 2:31 PM in reply to: 10% population in SD county are millionaires (exclude Primary RE)?! #93864NotCranky
ParticipantAh yes, I got mine, now you go get yours right?
I am not really taking that stance. Just using a personal anecdote to reply to biased anti- Real Estate sentiment. Probably shouldn’t do that.
You can own property at any time you want and it might be a good idea. Those possible options don’t appeal to you.
“If your house is a big piece of your nest egg, then you are relying on people like me to buy it sometime in the future.”
Not really. Yours truly hasn’t ever flipped anything. The properties I have owned previous to this one were mine and the banks) an average of 6.5 years. A low level, working class widow made a small fortune from one of them. Someone who apparently is not as bright as you or even me, bought the other one in the spring of 05.
This property is a big piece of my overall low net worth,it is also splittable. I might give it to my kids developed when I die. If I could not have afforded it here, I was headed for Arkansas..or Prescott AZ. I could sell it and diversify better but that is going away from my strengths and I like life here.The size of it means I could sell a portion or build a rent-able home or 3.The original house with a smaller property, after the split is worth almost as much as it was before the split and the new lot has a ton of potential. besides, meanwhile, I want more money, but I don’t need it. Maybe I’ll end up living on my assets when I am old,or sooner. I don’t find that so unusual be the assets be a pile of cash, stocks or property or a combination.Soliloquy:
I think the point is , investing in RE for comfort and prestige, before you can really afford it doesn’t work well for capitalization, but that doesn’t begin to describe the potential in the asset class. I see many people on this blog who, at least for the time being, see it in the shallow way .Hopefully some of them, especially those that should(the non rich), will see it differently before they pull the trigger regardless of the timing. Sounds grandiose for a slow starting, small fish like me, I know :).
Best wishes for a bright future.
October 31, 2007 at 12:10 PM in reply to: 10% population in SD county are millionaires (exclude Primary RE)?! #93736NotCranky
ParticipantSee, you have such a way with words. I was going to say it was a system designed by bitter renters! Just kidding,Just kidding really!
Man you could not get away with this fair and balanced approach on anyone else’s blog.
Thanks Rich
October 31, 2007 at 12:10 PM in reply to: 10% population in SD county are millionaires (exclude Primary RE)?! #93770NotCranky
ParticipantSee, you have such a way with words. I was going to say it was a system designed by bitter renters! Just kidding,Just kidding really!
Man you could not get away with this fair and balanced approach on anyone else’s blog.
Thanks Rich
October 31, 2007 at 12:10 PM in reply to: 10% population in SD county are millionaires (exclude Primary RE)?! #93779NotCranky
ParticipantSee, you have such a way with words. I was going to say it was a system designed by bitter renters! Just kidding,Just kidding really!
Man you could not get away with this fair and balanced approach on anyone else’s blog.
Thanks Rich
-
AuthorPosts
