Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
no_such_reality
ParticipantAh, Perception Management. The democratic party supporters have been doing it heavily since last Tuesday. The day after, the annoited talking heads for the dems where carefully painting the picture they wanted everybody to see.
For Indiana, enter 52% for Clinton. For North Carolina enter 53% for Obama. Then for the other yet-to-be-decided primaries give Clinton 60% (you’ll see my point in a minute). For the still-unpledged superdelegates, give 60% to Clinton.
Ah, PM at work, the nice thing about PM is it looks like truth, but it’s 100% fiction. The simple answer is the remaining superdelegates are going to go fairly close to 100% one way or the other. Hence, stuff (BS in a less polite world), trying to paint it as he’s already won.
I only have one simple question, what are Obama supporters afraid of? If he has it sewed up, let him start directing his campaign against McCain.
no_such_reality
ParticipantAh, Perception Management. The democratic party supporters have been doing it heavily since last Tuesday. The day after, the annoited talking heads for the dems where carefully painting the picture they wanted everybody to see.
For Indiana, enter 52% for Clinton. For North Carolina enter 53% for Obama. Then for the other yet-to-be-decided primaries give Clinton 60% (you’ll see my point in a minute). For the still-unpledged superdelegates, give 60% to Clinton.
Ah, PM at work, the nice thing about PM is it looks like truth, but it’s 100% fiction. The simple answer is the remaining superdelegates are going to go fairly close to 100% one way or the other. Hence, stuff (BS in a less polite world), trying to paint it as he’s already won.
I only have one simple question, what are Obama supporters afraid of? If he has it sewed up, let him start directing his campaign against McCain.
no_such_reality
ParticipantAh, Perception Management. The democratic party supporters have been doing it heavily since last Tuesday. The day after, the annoited talking heads for the dems where carefully painting the picture they wanted everybody to see.
For Indiana, enter 52% for Clinton. For North Carolina enter 53% for Obama. Then for the other yet-to-be-decided primaries give Clinton 60% (you’ll see my point in a minute). For the still-unpledged superdelegates, give 60% to Clinton.
Ah, PM at work, the nice thing about PM is it looks like truth, but it’s 100% fiction. The simple answer is the remaining superdelegates are going to go fairly close to 100% one way or the other. Hence, stuff (BS in a less polite world), trying to paint it as he’s already won.
I only have one simple question, what are Obama supporters afraid of? If he has it sewed up, let him start directing his campaign against McCain.
no_such_reality
ParticipantGive it time, you’ll see 1989 prices again.
No, that’s not a typo. 1989.
I’ve been snooping through sales records and realized today that 1989 prices in the OC are roughly equal to the 1999/2000 prices in the OC.
That’s nominal, not real. Nominal.
Does that put a real estate cycle in perspective for people?
no_such_reality
ParticipantGive it time, you’ll see 1989 prices again.
No, that’s not a typo. 1989.
I’ve been snooping through sales records and realized today that 1989 prices in the OC are roughly equal to the 1999/2000 prices in the OC.
That’s nominal, not real. Nominal.
Does that put a real estate cycle in perspective for people?
no_such_reality
ParticipantGive it time, you’ll see 1989 prices again.
No, that’s not a typo. 1989.
I’ve been snooping through sales records and realized today that 1989 prices in the OC are roughly equal to the 1999/2000 prices in the OC.
That’s nominal, not real. Nominal.
Does that put a real estate cycle in perspective for people?
no_such_reality
ParticipantGive it time, you’ll see 1989 prices again.
No, that’s not a typo. 1989.
I’ve been snooping through sales records and realized today that 1989 prices in the OC are roughly equal to the 1999/2000 prices in the OC.
That’s nominal, not real. Nominal.
Does that put a real estate cycle in perspective for people?
no_such_reality
ParticipantGive it time, you’ll see 1989 prices again.
No, that’s not a typo. 1989.
I’ve been snooping through sales records and realized today that 1989 prices in the OC are roughly equal to the 1999/2000 prices in the OC.
That’s nominal, not real. Nominal.
Does that put a real estate cycle in perspective for people?
no_such_reality
ParticipantOr it could go to buying a rich guy a condo in Paris.
I thought Nunez just ordered a $1000 bottle of wine and did some shopping.
no_such_reality
ParticipantOr it could go to buying a rich guy a condo in Paris.
I thought Nunez just ordered a $1000 bottle of wine and did some shopping.
no_such_reality
ParticipantOr it could go to buying a rich guy a condo in Paris.
I thought Nunez just ordered a $1000 bottle of wine and did some shopping.
no_such_reality
ParticipantOr it could go to buying a rich guy a condo in Paris.
I thought Nunez just ordered a $1000 bottle of wine and did some shopping.
no_such_reality
ParticipantOr it could go to buying a rich guy a condo in Paris.
I thought Nunez just ordered a $1000 bottle of wine and did some shopping.
no_such_reality
ParticipantIt will be interesting if they are working with a property manager that is legally managing properties for Wells.
Frankly, I find that hard to believe. It is possible for the property to be quickly turned from REO to investor.
It’s also incredibly easy for it to be just a fraudster watching the public info rolls for the completion of the NOTs.
-
AuthorPosts
