- This topic has 50 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by
kewp.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 24, 2008 at 1:22 PM #11623January 24, 2008 at 1:31 PM #142237
kewp
ParticipantRaise taxes. Lots of folks think the cuts are just a play so Schwarzenegger can do just that without losing much face as pol.
“You force my hand!”
January 24, 2008 at 1:31 PM #142566kewp
ParticipantRaise taxes. Lots of folks think the cuts are just a play so Schwarzenegger can do just that without losing much face as pol.
“You force my hand!”
January 24, 2008 at 1:31 PM #142502kewp
ParticipantRaise taxes. Lots of folks think the cuts are just a play so Schwarzenegger can do just that without losing much face as pol.
“You force my hand!”
January 24, 2008 at 1:31 PM #142476kewp
ParticipantRaise taxes. Lots of folks think the cuts are just a play so Schwarzenegger can do just that without losing much face as pol.
“You force my hand!”
January 24, 2008 at 1:31 PM #142463kewp
ParticipantRaise taxes. Lots of folks think the cuts are just a play so Schwarzenegger can do just that without losing much face as pol.
“You force my hand!”
January 24, 2008 at 2:48 PM #142652sethdallob
ParticipantYou’ve got it exactly right, except instead of raising taxes, they will raise “fees” – takes less votes to pass. He’s made the proposal so unpalatable to so many special interests (teachers, nurses, state workers, other unions) that it has 0 chance of being passed.
I think CA is really f*#$!d if they raise taxes in a recessionary environment…people are already going down hard from the credit seizure/bubble, and raising taxes/fees will only hurt more…
Oh well, when I get the check from the feds, I can just put it in another envelope and mail it to Sacramento – good times.
January 24, 2008 at 2:48 PM #142321sethdallob
ParticipantYou’ve got it exactly right, except instead of raising taxes, they will raise “fees” – takes less votes to pass. He’s made the proposal so unpalatable to so many special interests (teachers, nurses, state workers, other unions) that it has 0 chance of being passed.
I think CA is really f*#$!d if they raise taxes in a recessionary environment…people are already going down hard from the credit seizure/bubble, and raising taxes/fees will only hurt more…
Oh well, when I get the check from the feds, I can just put it in another envelope and mail it to Sacramento – good times.
January 24, 2008 at 2:48 PM #142548sethdallob
ParticipantYou’ve got it exactly right, except instead of raising taxes, they will raise “fees” – takes less votes to pass. He’s made the proposal so unpalatable to so many special interests (teachers, nurses, state workers, other unions) that it has 0 chance of being passed.
I think CA is really f*#$!d if they raise taxes in a recessionary environment…people are already going down hard from the credit seizure/bubble, and raising taxes/fees will only hurt more…
Oh well, when I get the check from the feds, I can just put it in another envelope and mail it to Sacramento – good times.
January 24, 2008 at 2:48 PM #142559sethdallob
ParticipantYou’ve got it exactly right, except instead of raising taxes, they will raise “fees” – takes less votes to pass. He’s made the proposal so unpalatable to so many special interests (teachers, nurses, state workers, other unions) that it has 0 chance of being passed.
I think CA is really f*#$!d if they raise taxes in a recessionary environment…people are already going down hard from the credit seizure/bubble, and raising taxes/fees will only hurt more…
Oh well, when I get the check from the feds, I can just put it in another envelope and mail it to Sacramento – good times.
January 24, 2008 at 2:48 PM #142587sethdallob
ParticipantYou’ve got it exactly right, except instead of raising taxes, they will raise “fees” – takes less votes to pass. He’s made the proposal so unpalatable to so many special interests (teachers, nurses, state workers, other unions) that it has 0 chance of being passed.
I think CA is really f*#$!d if they raise taxes in a recessionary environment…people are already going down hard from the credit seizure/bubble, and raising taxes/fees will only hurt more…
Oh well, when I get the check from the feds, I can just put it in another envelope and mail it to Sacramento – good times.
January 24, 2008 at 2:55 PM #142331patientlywaiting
ParticipantIt’s a good time to shrink government. If everyone in the private sector is hurting, voters won’t feel much sympathy for the government workers.
We need to shrink government to establish the base of a future robust economy based on innovation and entrepreneurship. We can’t afford to subsidize our way out of every little hole.
Now is the time to enact wide ranging reforms rather than pass feel-good legislation.
January 24, 2008 at 2:55 PM #142662patientlywaiting
ParticipantIt’s a good time to shrink government. If everyone in the private sector is hurting, voters won’t feel much sympathy for the government workers.
We need to shrink government to establish the base of a future robust economy based on innovation and entrepreneurship. We can’t afford to subsidize our way out of every little hole.
Now is the time to enact wide ranging reforms rather than pass feel-good legislation.
January 24, 2008 at 2:55 PM #142597patientlywaiting
ParticipantIt’s a good time to shrink government. If everyone in the private sector is hurting, voters won’t feel much sympathy for the government workers.
We need to shrink government to establish the base of a future robust economy based on innovation and entrepreneurship. We can’t afford to subsidize our way out of every little hole.
Now is the time to enact wide ranging reforms rather than pass feel-good legislation.
January 24, 2008 at 2:55 PM #142558patientlywaiting
ParticipantIt’s a good time to shrink government. If everyone in the private sector is hurting, voters won’t feel much sympathy for the government workers.
We need to shrink government to establish the base of a future robust economy based on innovation and entrepreneurship. We can’t afford to subsidize our way out of every little hole.
Now is the time to enact wide ranging reforms rather than pass feel-good legislation.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.