Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
lurkor
ParticipantEven tho RO is no longer sharing his brilliance it’s time to revisit his awesome stock calls.
“Submitted by RatherOpinionated on December 6, 2007 – 9:15am.
Rich,
the same way you know that buying CFC or FNM or FRE or C for any of your clients is one of the smartest things you’ll do all year.
”Price change since the day of RO’s recommendations –
CFC down 48%
FRE down 20%
FNM down 17%
C down only 5%, a huge winner by RO standardsHe’s as good at stock picking as real estate investing!
ParticipantEven tho RO is no longer sharing his brilliance it’s time to revisit his awesome stock calls.
“Submitted by RatherOpinionated on December 6, 2007 – 9:15am.
Rich,
the same way you know that buying CFC or FNM or FRE or C for any of your clients is one of the smartest things you’ll do all year.
”Price change since the day of RO’s recommendations –
CFC down 48%
FRE down 20%
FNM down 17%
C down only 5%, a huge winner by RO standardsHe’s as good at stock picking as real estate investing!
ParticipantEven tho RO is no longer sharing his brilliance it’s time to revisit his awesome stock calls.
“Submitted by RatherOpinionated on December 6, 2007 – 9:15am.
Rich,
the same way you know that buying CFC or FNM or FRE or C for any of your clients is one of the smartest things you’ll do all year.
”Price change since the day of RO’s recommendations –
CFC down 48%
FRE down 20%
FNM down 17%
C down only 5%, a huge winner by RO standardsHe’s as good at stock picking as real estate investing!
ParticipantEven tho RO is no longer sharing his brilliance it’s time to revisit his awesome stock calls.
“Submitted by RatherOpinionated on December 6, 2007 – 9:15am.
Rich,
the same way you know that buying CFC or FNM or FRE or C for any of your clients is one of the smartest things you’ll do all year.
”Price change since the day of RO’s recommendations –
CFC down 48%
FRE down 20%
FNM down 17%
C down only 5%, a huge winner by RO standardsHe’s as good at stock picking as real estate investing!
ParticipantWho would you rather trust to make decisions on this subject? An obstetrician (Ron Paul) or a professor with three published textbooks on macroeconomics (Ben Bernanke)?
The guy who called the housing bubble for what it was (Ron Paul) or the guy who denied there was ever a housing bubble at all (Ben Bernanke)? You’re basically waving Bernanke’s PhD around while ignoring the fact that his forecasting and analysis record is horrendously bad. I don’t really care about what his degree is in, I’ll pick the guy who didn’t deny one of the most obvious bubbles in history and who has proven that he has the better grasp of what’s actually going on.
The rest of your post is teeming with economic fallacies but it’s getting late. From what you typed you are clearly ignorant of the Austrian theory of the business cycle so I recommend that you actually try to understand it before bashing it on a public forum.
ParticipantWho would you rather trust to make decisions on this subject? An obstetrician (Ron Paul) or a professor with three published textbooks on macroeconomics (Ben Bernanke)?
The guy who called the housing bubble for what it was (Ron Paul) or the guy who denied there was ever a housing bubble at all (Ben Bernanke)? You’re basically waving Bernanke’s PhD around while ignoring the fact that his forecasting and analysis record is horrendously bad. I don’t really care about what his degree is in, I’ll pick the guy who didn’t deny one of the most obvious bubbles in history and who has proven that he has the better grasp of what’s actually going on.
The rest of your post is teeming with economic fallacies but it’s getting late. From what you typed you are clearly ignorant of the Austrian theory of the business cycle so I recommend that you actually try to understand it before bashing it on a public forum.
ParticipantWho would you rather trust to make decisions on this subject? An obstetrician (Ron Paul) or a professor with three published textbooks on macroeconomics (Ben Bernanke)?
The guy who called the housing bubble for what it was (Ron Paul) or the guy who denied there was ever a housing bubble at all (Ben Bernanke)? You’re basically waving Bernanke’s PhD around while ignoring the fact that his forecasting and analysis record is horrendously bad. I don’t really care about what his degree is in, I’ll pick the guy who didn’t deny one of the most obvious bubbles in history and who has proven that he has the better grasp of what’s actually going on.
The rest of your post is teeming with economic fallacies but it’s getting late. From what you typed you are clearly ignorant of the Austrian theory of the business cycle so I recommend that you actually try to understand it before bashing it on a public forum.
ParticipantWho would you rather trust to make decisions on this subject? An obstetrician (Ron Paul) or a professor with three published textbooks on macroeconomics (Ben Bernanke)?
The guy who called the housing bubble for what it was (Ron Paul) or the guy who denied there was ever a housing bubble at all (Ben Bernanke)? You’re basically waving Bernanke’s PhD around while ignoring the fact that his forecasting and analysis record is horrendously bad. I don’t really care about what his degree is in, I’ll pick the guy who didn’t deny one of the most obvious bubbles in history and who has proven that he has the better grasp of what’s actually going on.
The rest of your post is teeming with economic fallacies but it’s getting late. From what you typed you are clearly ignorant of the Austrian theory of the business cycle so I recommend that you actually try to understand it before bashing it on a public forum.
ParticipantWho would you rather trust to make decisions on this subject? An obstetrician (Ron Paul) or a professor with three published textbooks on macroeconomics (Ben Bernanke)?
The guy who called the housing bubble for what it was (Ron Paul) or the guy who denied there was ever a housing bubble at all (Ben Bernanke)? You’re basically waving Bernanke’s PhD around while ignoring the fact that his forecasting and analysis record is horrendously bad. I don’t really care about what his degree is in, I’ll pick the guy who didn’t deny one of the most obvious bubbles in history and who has proven that he has the better grasp of what’s actually going on.
The rest of your post is teeming with economic fallacies but it’s getting late. From what you typed you are clearly ignorant of the Austrian theory of the business cycle so I recommend that you actually try to understand it before bashing it on a public forum.
ParticipantScruffydog: (whimpering) It was unintentional…
What a load of bullshit. Your original post was purposefully inflammatory and insulting. Don’t try to play it off like you were the victim here.
By the way for you to use the kool aid metaphor against others is just priceless.
I still can’t tell if this all a brilliant troll or you are truly as stupid and self-righteous as it seems. If it’s a troll, congratulations because you nailed it. If it’s for real, then we are all fearful and panicky about your future too.
ParticipantScruffydog: (whimpering) It was unintentional…
What a load of bullshit. Your original post was purposefully inflammatory and insulting. Don’t try to play it off like you were the victim here.
By the way for you to use the kool aid metaphor against others is just priceless.
I still can’t tell if this all a brilliant troll or you are truly as stupid and self-righteous as it seems. If it’s a troll, congratulations because you nailed it. If it’s for real, then we are all fearful and panicky about your future too.
Participant“I’m really tired of all the excuses such as give it more time.”
Housing downturns take many years to play out. Pointing out this historically verifiable fact is not an “excuse.” What is it that you think people are trying to excuse, anyway?
You can dictate what you think is “more than enough time” for the correction to end, but it doesn’t amount to much if you just pull a number out without basing it on any logic or historical precedent.
Participant“I’m really tired of all the excuses such as give it more time.”
Housing downturns take many years to play out. Pointing out this historically verifiable fact is not an “excuse.” What is it that you think people are trying to excuse, anyway?
You can dictate what you think is “more than enough time” for the correction to end, but it doesn’t amount to much if you just pull a number out without basing it on any logic or historical precedent.
ParticipantSorry Stan. I was getting default rates of the backing mortgages mixes up with home prices. It’s Friday afternoon and I’m not too alert.
I think the later posters made the point I was clumsily trying to make. What you describe makes sense for the first round of securitization, but considering that a CDO might be made up entirely of low-rated tranches from prior securitiziations, as one muggle’s link says, things could get bad if those initial tranches got wiped out.
Anyway thanks for clarifying.
-
AuthorPosts