Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
KSMountain
ParticipantOh no. That’s really bad news.
That has been a really reliably good station.
ParticipantWell, if you read Roberts’ comments, I don’t think he would characterize it as a conservative decision. (Not sure what you meant by that word).
I’m pretty sure he would say that in forming his opinion the last thing he considered was the possible impact on Democrats or Republicans.
And I hope that’s true.
One example he cited was that under current law, you couldn’t even distribute a politically-oriented pamphlet if it had funding by a corporation (even a non-profit corporation).
In a sense, that really *does* limit speech – the speech of the corporation’s officers and even by extension its shareholders.
ParticipantWell, if you read Roberts’ comments, I don’t think he would characterize it as a conservative decision. (Not sure what you meant by that word).
I’m pretty sure he would say that in forming his opinion the last thing he considered was the possible impact on Democrats or Republicans.
And I hope that’s true.
One example he cited was that under current law, you couldn’t even distribute a politically-oriented pamphlet if it had funding by a corporation (even a non-profit corporation).
In a sense, that really *does* limit speech – the speech of the corporation’s officers and even by extension its shareholders.
ParticipantWell, if you read Roberts’ comments, I don’t think he would characterize it as a conservative decision. (Not sure what you meant by that word).
I’m pretty sure he would say that in forming his opinion the last thing he considered was the possible impact on Democrats or Republicans.
And I hope that’s true.
One example he cited was that under current law, you couldn’t even distribute a politically-oriented pamphlet if it had funding by a corporation (even a non-profit corporation).
In a sense, that really *does* limit speech – the speech of the corporation’s officers and even by extension its shareholders.
ParticipantWell, if you read Roberts’ comments, I don’t think he would characterize it as a conservative decision. (Not sure what you meant by that word).
I’m pretty sure he would say that in forming his opinion the last thing he considered was the possible impact on Democrats or Republicans.
And I hope that’s true.
One example he cited was that under current law, you couldn’t even distribute a politically-oriented pamphlet if it had funding by a corporation (even a non-profit corporation).
In a sense, that really *does* limit speech – the speech of the corporation’s officers and even by extension its shareholders.
ParticipantWell, if you read Roberts’ comments, I don’t think he would characterize it as a conservative decision. (Not sure what you meant by that word).
I’m pretty sure he would say that in forming his opinion the last thing he considered was the possible impact on Democrats or Republicans.
And I hope that’s true.
One example he cited was that under current law, you couldn’t even distribute a politically-oriented pamphlet if it had funding by a corporation (even a non-profit corporation).
In a sense, that really *does* limit speech – the speech of the corporation’s officers and even by extension its shareholders.
Participant[quote=pri_dk]Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.[/quote]
Now *that* is a persuasive argument, to me.Participant[quote=pri_dk]Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.[/quote]
Now *that* is a persuasive argument, to me.Participant[quote=pri_dk]Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.[/quote]
Now *that* is a persuasive argument, to me.Participant[quote=pri_dk]Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.[/quote]
Now *that* is a persuasive argument, to me.Participant[quote=pri_dk]Both Joe’s kids and Jose’s kids are going to end up in US communities as adults (like it or not). So perhaps we should educate them both.[/quote]
Now *that* is a persuasive argument, to me.Participant[quote=Russell]If there was anyone who could threaten to make that kind of equality nearly universal he would be killed.[/quote]
Interesting observation.
Participant[quote=Russell]If there was anyone who could threaten to make that kind of equality nearly universal he would be killed.[/quote]
Interesting observation.
Participant[quote=Russell]If there was anyone who could threaten to make that kind of equality nearly universal he would be killed.[/quote]
Interesting observation.
-
AuthorPosts
