Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
GH
ParticipantMany would like to see printed money go away, and in some ways I agree. That said, most of you have jobs and homes paid for directly or indirectly by printed money. Without it I believe we would see unemployment in excess of 50% right now.
I understand some are on retirements etc, but even that would be terminated if the tax payers suddenly became non tax payers as they lost jobs, as is already the case in a huge way in States across the country. So the choice is for ALL of us to get used to a LOT lower income and lifestyle, where ALL debts are not paid including those owed to retirees (GASP) or we print like there was no tomorrow.
Hard choices I know, but unless we can get away from a consumption based economy in which the things we consume are made by people earning less than a dollar an hour in most cases, I see little other choice.
As for Obama, I don’t know if he is a Trojan horse, or just inept, but the idea of Obama vs the reality of Obama are two very different things. And no that does not make me a Bush supporter. I am dismayed to find a third term of Bush policy when so much more should have and needed to be possible.
GH
ParticipantMany would like to see printed money go away, and in some ways I agree. That said, most of you have jobs and homes paid for directly or indirectly by printed money. Without it I believe we would see unemployment in excess of 50% right now.
I understand some are on retirements etc, but even that would be terminated if the tax payers suddenly became non tax payers as they lost jobs, as is already the case in a huge way in States across the country. So the choice is for ALL of us to get used to a LOT lower income and lifestyle, where ALL debts are not paid including those owed to retirees (GASP) or we print like there was no tomorrow.
Hard choices I know, but unless we can get away from a consumption based economy in which the things we consume are made by people earning less than a dollar an hour in most cases, I see little other choice.
As for Obama, I don’t know if he is a Trojan horse, or just inept, but the idea of Obama vs the reality of Obama are two very different things. And no that does not make me a Bush supporter. I am dismayed to find a third term of Bush policy when so much more should have and needed to be possible.
GH
ParticipantMany would like to see printed money go away, and in some ways I agree. That said, most of you have jobs and homes paid for directly or indirectly by printed money. Without it I believe we would see unemployment in excess of 50% right now.
I understand some are on retirements etc, but even that would be terminated if the tax payers suddenly became non tax payers as they lost jobs, as is already the case in a huge way in States across the country. So the choice is for ALL of us to get used to a LOT lower income and lifestyle, where ALL debts are not paid including those owed to retirees (GASP) or we print like there was no tomorrow.
Hard choices I know, but unless we can get away from a consumption based economy in which the things we consume are made by people earning less than a dollar an hour in most cases, I see little other choice.
As for Obama, I don’t know if he is a Trojan horse, or just inept, but the idea of Obama vs the reality of Obama are two very different things. And no that does not make me a Bush supporter. I am dismayed to find a third term of Bush policy when so much more should have and needed to be possible.
GH
ParticipantMany would like to see printed money go away, and in some ways I agree. That said, most of you have jobs and homes paid for directly or indirectly by printed money. Without it I believe we would see unemployment in excess of 50% right now.
I understand some are on retirements etc, but even that would be terminated if the tax payers suddenly became non tax payers as they lost jobs, as is already the case in a huge way in States across the country. So the choice is for ALL of us to get used to a LOT lower income and lifestyle, where ALL debts are not paid including those owed to retirees (GASP) or we print like there was no tomorrow.
Hard choices I know, but unless we can get away from a consumption based economy in which the things we consume are made by people earning less than a dollar an hour in most cases, I see little other choice.
As for Obama, I don’t know if he is a Trojan horse, or just inept, but the idea of Obama vs the reality of Obama are two very different things. And no that does not make me a Bush supporter. I am dismayed to find a third term of Bush policy when so much more should have and needed to be possible.
GH
ParticipantMany would like to see printed money go away, and in some ways I agree. That said, most of you have jobs and homes paid for directly or indirectly by printed money. Without it I believe we would see unemployment in excess of 50% right now.
I understand some are on retirements etc, but even that would be terminated if the tax payers suddenly became non tax payers as they lost jobs, as is already the case in a huge way in States across the country. So the choice is for ALL of us to get used to a LOT lower income and lifestyle, where ALL debts are not paid including those owed to retirees (GASP) or we print like there was no tomorrow.
Hard choices I know, but unless we can get away from a consumption based economy in which the things we consume are made by people earning less than a dollar an hour in most cases, I see little other choice.
As for Obama, I don’t know if he is a Trojan horse, or just inept, but the idea of Obama vs the reality of Obama are two very different things. And no that does not make me a Bush supporter. I am dismayed to find a third term of Bush policy when so much more should have and needed to be possible.
GH
ParticipantIf Obama prevails, he would be the only president to provide universal health care. That’s better than nothing.
Scary eh? If the plan Obama is presenting is so GOOD for America, why is the insurance and medical industry so quiet?
GH
ParticipantIf Obama prevails, he would be the only president to provide universal health care. That’s better than nothing.
Scary eh? If the plan Obama is presenting is so GOOD for America, why is the insurance and medical industry so quiet?
GH
ParticipantIf Obama prevails, he would be the only president to provide universal health care. That’s better than nothing.
Scary eh? If the plan Obama is presenting is so GOOD for America, why is the insurance and medical industry so quiet?
GH
ParticipantIf Obama prevails, he would be the only president to provide universal health care. That’s better than nothing.
Scary eh? If the plan Obama is presenting is so GOOD for America, why is the insurance and medical industry so quiet?
GH
ParticipantIf Obama prevails, he would be the only president to provide universal health care. That’s better than nothing.
Scary eh? If the plan Obama is presenting is so GOOD for America, why is the insurance and medical industry so quiet?
December 9, 2009 at 9:07 AM in reply to: OT: 40% of unintended acceleration claims are Toyotas #492124GH
ParticipantI experienced this problem in a 2002 Camry. I was driving on the 8 up the grade back to San Diego and had the cruise control set at 70 – At some point, the car surged forward quickly getting up to over 80. I was able to correct this by dropping the car out of cruise control and applying the brake, but I know there was no floor mat involved. I would say this was a software or hardware glitch.
December 9, 2009 at 9:07 AM in reply to: OT: 40% of unintended acceleration claims are Toyotas #492290GH
ParticipantI experienced this problem in a 2002 Camry. I was driving on the 8 up the grade back to San Diego and had the cruise control set at 70 – At some point, the car surged forward quickly getting up to over 80. I was able to correct this by dropping the car out of cruise control and applying the brake, but I know there was no floor mat involved. I would say this was a software or hardware glitch.
December 9, 2009 at 9:07 AM in reply to: OT: 40% of unintended acceleration claims are Toyotas #492671GH
ParticipantI experienced this problem in a 2002 Camry. I was driving on the 8 up the grade back to San Diego and had the cruise control set at 70 – At some point, the car surged forward quickly getting up to over 80. I was able to correct this by dropping the car out of cruise control and applying the brake, but I know there was no floor mat involved. I would say this was a software or hardware glitch.
December 9, 2009 at 9:07 AM in reply to: OT: 40% of unintended acceleration claims are Toyotas #492761GH
ParticipantI experienced this problem in a 2002 Camry. I was driving on the 8 up the grade back to San Diego and had the cruise control set at 70 – At some point, the car surged forward quickly getting up to over 80. I was able to correct this by dropping the car out of cruise control and applying the brake, but I know there was no floor mat involved. I would say this was a software or hardware glitch.
-
AuthorPosts
