[EconProf]

BobS
This news adds up to one more reason to NOT invest in San Diego, or elsewhere in CA. With a top-heavy government, a huge tax burden, and an increasingly liberal electorate, our business environment and jobs situation will only get worse. Employers and wealthy tax averse people will increasingly flee the state.
Tax-friendly states like Texas, Nevada, and Florida beckon, and have low housing costs to boot.

[EconProf]

BobS
This news adds up to one more reason to NOT invest in San Diego, or elsewhere in CA. With a top-heavy government, a huge tax burden, and an increasingly liberal electorate, our business environment and jobs situation will only get worse. Employers and wealthy tax averse people will increasingly flee the state.
Tax-friendly states like Texas, Nevada, and Florida beckon, and have low housing costs to boot.

[EconProf]

BobS
This news adds up to one more reason to NOT invest in San Diego, or elsewhere in CA. With a top-heavy government, a huge tax burden, and an increasingly liberal electorate, our business environment and jobs situation will only get worse. Employers and wealthy tax averse people will increasingly flee the state.
Tax-friendly states like Texas, Nevada, and Florida beckon, and have low housing costs to boot.

[EconProf]

BobS
This news adds up to one more reason to NOT invest in San Diego, or elsewhere in CA. With a top-heavy government, a huge tax burden, and an increasingly liberal electorate, our business environment and jobs situation will only get worse. Employers and wealthy tax averse people will increasingly flee the state.
Tax-friendly states like Texas, Nevada, and Florida beckon, and have low housing costs to boot.

[EconProf]

BobS
This news adds up to one more reason to NOT invest in San Diego, or elsewhere in CA. With a top-heavy government, a huge tax burden, and an increasingly liberal electorate, our business environment and jobs situation will only get worse. Employers and wealthy tax averse people will increasingly flee the state.
Tax-friendly states like Texas, Nevada, and Florida beckon, and have low housing costs to boot.

[EconProf]

BobS
Sounds like I agree with your friend’s political views. But I would also keep quiet about them. Have ruined or strained many relationships when the talk veers toward politics or religion.

[EconProf]

BobS
Sounds like I agree with your friend’s political views. But I would also keep quiet about them. Have ruined or strained many relationships when the talk veers toward politics or religion.

[EconProf]

BobS
Sounds like I agree with your friend’s political views. But I would also keep quiet about them. Have ruined or strained many relationships when the talk veers toward politics or religion.

[EconProf]

BobS
Sounds like I agree with your friend’s political views. But I would also keep quiet about them. Have ruined or strained many relationships when the talk veers toward politics or religion.

[EconProf]

BobS
Sounds like I agree with your friend’s political views. But I would also keep quiet about them. Have ruined or strained many relationships when the talk veers toward politics or religion.

[EconProf]

BobS
Unless there are some extraordinary circumstances with his personal finances, this is a no-brainer. He should walk away. But first, do everything he can to build his liquidity as his credit standing will crash and he will have to be on a cash basis for several years. Not a bad thing, actually.
I’d also inform the lender(s) of the realities of his situation–perhaps they will see his point of view and work out a less-damaging outcome for all concerned, but that’s not likely.

[EconProf]

BobS
Unless there are some extraordinary circumstances with his personal finances, this is a no-brainer. He should walk away. But first, do everything he can to build his liquidity as his credit standing will crash and he will have to be on a cash basis for several years. Not a bad thing, actually.
I’d also inform the lender(s) of the realities of his situation–perhaps they will see his point of view and work out a less-damaging outcome for all concerned, but that’s not likely.

[EconProf]

BobS
Unless there are some extraordinary circumstances with his personal finances, this is a no-brainer. He should walk away. But first, do everything he can to build his liquidity as his credit standing will crash and he will have to be on a cash basis for several years. Not a bad thing, actually.
I’d also inform the lender(s) of the realities of his situation–perhaps they will see his point of view and work out a less-damaging outcome for all concerned, but that’s not likely.

[EconProf]

BobS
Unless there are some extraordinary circumstances with his personal finances, this is a no-brainer. He should walk away. But first, do everything he can to build his liquidity as his credit standing will crash and he will have to be on a cash basis for several years. Not a bad thing, actually.
I’d also inform the lender(s) of the realities of his situation–perhaps they will see his point of view and work out a less-damaging outcome for all concerned, but that’s not likely.

[EconProf]

BobS
Unless there are some extraordinary circumstances with his personal finances, this is a no-brainer. He should walk away. But first, do everything he can to build his liquidity as his credit standing will crash and he will have to be on a cash basis for several years. Not a bad thing, actually.
I’d also inform the lender(s) of the realities of his situation–perhaps they will see his point of view and work out a less-damaging outcome for all concerned, but that’s not likely.

[Author]

Posts