Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
EconProf
ParticipantTG: My only regret is that you may have less time for posting here. Tell us that won’t happen.
ParticipantTG: My only regret is that you may have less time for posting here. Tell us that won’t happen.
ParticipantTG: My only regret is that you may have less time for posting here. Tell us that won’t happen.
ParticipantTax burden is best measured as a % of personal income, since states vary widely in average income.
According to the Tax Foundation, CAs average tax burden, including state & local taxes is 10.5%, vs. a national average of 9.9%. That % is a remarkably tight clustering, but don’t forget that income variance state to state adds to the disparity. For instance, Connecticutt income a lot higher than Mississippi’s.
Our ranking is 6th highest among the states. We are not undertaxed.ParticipantTax burden is best measured as a % of personal income, since states vary widely in average income.
According to the Tax Foundation, CAs average tax burden, including state & local taxes is 10.5%, vs. a national average of 9.9%. That % is a remarkably tight clustering, but don’t forget that income variance state to state adds to the disparity. For instance, Connecticutt income a lot higher than Mississippi’s.
Our ranking is 6th highest among the states. We are not undertaxed.ParticipantTax burden is best measured as a % of personal income, since states vary widely in average income.
According to the Tax Foundation, CAs average tax burden, including state & local taxes is 10.5%, vs. a national average of 9.9%. That % is a remarkably tight clustering, but don’t forget that income variance state to state adds to the disparity. For instance, Connecticutt income a lot higher than Mississippi’s.
Our ranking is 6th highest among the states. We are not undertaxed.ParticipantTax burden is best measured as a % of personal income, since states vary widely in average income.
According to the Tax Foundation, CAs average tax burden, including state & local taxes is 10.5%, vs. a national average of 9.9%. That % is a remarkably tight clustering, but don’t forget that income variance state to state adds to the disparity. For instance, Connecticutt income a lot higher than Mississippi’s.
Our ranking is 6th highest among the states. We are not undertaxed.ParticipantTax burden is best measured as a % of personal income, since states vary widely in average income.
According to the Tax Foundation, CAs average tax burden, including state & local taxes is 10.5%, vs. a national average of 9.9%. That % is a remarkably tight clustering, but don’t forget that income variance state to state adds to the disparity. For instance, Connecticutt income a lot higher than Mississippi’s.
Our ranking is 6th highest among the states. We are not undertaxed.November 5, 2008 at 2:32 PM in reply to: Stock market set to rocket on prospects of Obama Presidency (up 250 points already) #299593ParticipantThe Dow closed down 486.
TheBreeze: We await your wisdom.November 5, 2008 at 2:32 PM in reply to: Stock market set to rocket on prospects of Obama Presidency (up 250 points already) #299949ParticipantThe Dow closed down 486.
TheBreeze: We await your wisdom.November 5, 2008 at 2:32 PM in reply to: Stock market set to rocket on prospects of Obama Presidency (up 250 points already) #299961ParticipantThe Dow closed down 486.
TheBreeze: We await your wisdom.November 5, 2008 at 2:32 PM in reply to: Stock market set to rocket on prospects of Obama Presidency (up 250 points already) #299975ParticipantThe Dow closed down 486.
TheBreeze: We await your wisdom.November 5, 2008 at 2:32 PM in reply to: Stock market set to rocket on prospects of Obama Presidency (up 250 points already) #300023ParticipantThe Dow closed down 486.
TheBreeze: We await your wisdom.ParticipantAccording to the folks at the relevant county office, the value as of last January is what counts, plus or minus 3 months. The language of the forms used stresses this.
This is understandable, since values have fallen at least 10% since January for most areas. The Assessor naturally wants to not be too generous in lowering assessed values, so will stick to their rules.
I found the clerks at the County Administration Building to be very helpful and courteous, by the way. That may not last, as they are about to get a tsunami of appeals. They are already way behind on processing their current backlog. -
AuthorPosts
