Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
EconProf
ParticipantI am somewhat familiar with North Park from being an investor there and glazing contractor in the neighborhood long ago. It is a cutsey house in a cutsey area that strongly appeals to a lot of people. The size fits the scaled-down living trend of many who want to shed possessions, yard-work, commuting, and want walkable neighborhoods. A lot of posters on this site don’t want to accept the verdict of the marketplace.
EconProf
ParticipantI am somewhat familiar with North Park from being an investor there and glazing contractor in the neighborhood long ago. It is a cutsey house in a cutsey area that strongly appeals to a lot of people. The size fits the scaled-down living trend of many who want to shed possessions, yard-work, commuting, and want walkable neighborhoods. A lot of posters on this site don’t want to accept the verdict of the marketplace.
EconProf
ParticipantI am somewhat familiar with North Park from being an investor there and glazing contractor in the neighborhood long ago. It is a cutsey house in a cutsey area that strongly appeals to a lot of people. The size fits the scaled-down living trend of many who want to shed possessions, yard-work, commuting, and want walkable neighborhoods. A lot of posters on this site don’t want to accept the verdict of the marketplace.
EconProf
ParticipantTo crush perfectly good, 18 MPG cars, some with less than 100k miles on them is positively sinful. The cars have lots of utility left in them, and in a world with needy people this is such a waste. 40 miles south of us poor people are pushing around real clunkers, massive polluters and unsafe gas guzzlers. There would be a net gain to the environment, to human safety, and to consumer satisfaction if our government could have exerted a modicum or creativity and traded our “clunkers” for theirs.
EconProf
ParticipantTo crush perfectly good, 18 MPG cars, some with less than 100k miles on them is positively sinful. The cars have lots of utility left in them, and in a world with needy people this is such a waste. 40 miles south of us poor people are pushing around real clunkers, massive polluters and unsafe gas guzzlers. There would be a net gain to the environment, to human safety, and to consumer satisfaction if our government could have exerted a modicum or creativity and traded our “clunkers” for theirs.
EconProf
ParticipantTo crush perfectly good, 18 MPG cars, some with less than 100k miles on them is positively sinful. The cars have lots of utility left in them, and in a world with needy people this is such a waste. 40 miles south of us poor people are pushing around real clunkers, massive polluters and unsafe gas guzzlers. There would be a net gain to the environment, to human safety, and to consumer satisfaction if our government could have exerted a modicum or creativity and traded our “clunkers” for theirs.
EconProf
ParticipantTo crush perfectly good, 18 MPG cars, some with less than 100k miles on them is positively sinful. The cars have lots of utility left in them, and in a world with needy people this is such a waste. 40 miles south of us poor people are pushing around real clunkers, massive polluters and unsafe gas guzzlers. There would be a net gain to the environment, to human safety, and to consumer satisfaction if our government could have exerted a modicum or creativity and traded our “clunkers” for theirs.
EconProf
ParticipantTo crush perfectly good, 18 MPG cars, some with less than 100k miles on them is positively sinful. The cars have lots of utility left in them, and in a world with needy people this is such a waste. 40 miles south of us poor people are pushing around real clunkers, massive polluters and unsafe gas guzzlers. There would be a net gain to the environment, to human safety, and to consumer satisfaction if our government could have exerted a modicum or creativity and traded our “clunkers” for theirs.
EconProf
Participantastephen2: Assuming you are in CA (which you have not yet cleared up as requested), you should have gotten a written answer that also spelled out the appeals process–your next step in your very reasonable challenge of the assessor’s claim.
If you are in CA, the appeal can now easily go to the hearing stage where you can make your case. Why not do that? Its free, and you stand to save a lot of money.EconProf
Participantastephen2: Assuming you are in CA (which you have not yet cleared up as requested), you should have gotten a written answer that also spelled out the appeals process–your next step in your very reasonable challenge of the assessor’s claim.
If you are in CA, the appeal can now easily go to the hearing stage where you can make your case. Why not do that? Its free, and you stand to save a lot of money.EconProf
Participantastephen2: Assuming you are in CA (which you have not yet cleared up as requested), you should have gotten a written answer that also spelled out the appeals process–your next step in your very reasonable challenge of the assessor’s claim.
If you are in CA, the appeal can now easily go to the hearing stage where you can make your case. Why not do that? Its free, and you stand to save a lot of money.EconProf
Participantastephen2: Assuming you are in CA (which you have not yet cleared up as requested), you should have gotten a written answer that also spelled out the appeals process–your next step in your very reasonable challenge of the assessor’s claim.
If you are in CA, the appeal can now easily go to the hearing stage where you can make your case. Why not do that? Its free, and you stand to save a lot of money.EconProf
Participantastephen2: Assuming you are in CA (which you have not yet cleared up as requested), you should have gotten a written answer that also spelled out the appeals process–your next step in your very reasonable challenge of the assessor’s claim.
If you are in CA, the appeal can now easily go to the hearing stage where you can make your case. Why not do that? Its free, and you stand to save a lot of money.EconProf
ParticipantDeed in Lieu of foreclosure is when the lender and borrower agree to avoid the expense and hassle of the foreclosure process and the property is given over to the lender who then presumably sells it. It actually makes a lot of sense when the value is only a little less than the mortgage, because it lessens property deterioration during the FC process, speeds everything up, and is pretty common among private TD lenders. Banks have their rules and bureaucracies, and have to do everything the hard way…don’t want to admit their mistakes, etc., so they do it less frequently.
-
AuthorPosts
