[Dukehorn]

I saw a recent Church sign (in Sulphur Springs, TX) that stated the following:

Reason is the Greatest Enemy of Faith

I think that’s utterly wrong. Reason isn’t the enemy of faith. It’s not an “either or” situation. However, for a church to espouse it as such is a danger to society. Query: Why is it OK for conservatives to claim to protect racist speech as protected by our Bill of Rights and then accept censorship of our NIH and NASA scientists by politicos? That’s what has confused me the past 8 years.

Allan, the criticisms of cooprider are legitimate. He’s the one ranting against science for being incorrect (sort of like those folks that believed that the world was flat or the sun revolved around the earth). There are plenty of folks here that are spiritual but are not dogmatic in their beliefs.

Have you been to the creationism museum in Tennessee? Have your friends at the NIH and NASA complain to you about being muzzled by this particular administration? It’s the overt anti-science element of this society that you should be criticizing. You shouldn’t be criticizing those of us who actually study and publish for being baffled by the constant harping by those with no knowledge of how scientific theory is taught and accepted in our graduate schools.

And if that’s construed as “elitism” then it begs the question what’s the point of becoming an expert in something if everyone’s “opinion” carries the same weight….

[Dukehorn]

The only reason the bubble went on for so long is probably due to fraud, lack of regulation and the artificial prop by Greenspan and some of you are blaming Schiff for not getting the right time-frame?

Please, where’s the logical reasoning???

[Dukehorn]

The only reason the bubble went on for so long is probably due to fraud, lack of regulation and the artificial prop by Greenspan and some of you are blaming Schiff for not getting the right time-frame?

Please, where’s the logical reasoning???

[Dukehorn]

The only reason the bubble went on for so long is probably due to fraud, lack of regulation and the artificial prop by Greenspan and some of you are blaming Schiff for not getting the right time-frame?

Please, where’s the logical reasoning???

[Dukehorn]

The only reason the bubble went on for so long is probably due to fraud, lack of regulation and the artificial prop by Greenspan and some of you are blaming Schiff for not getting the right time-frame?

Please, where’s the logical reasoning???

[Dukehorn]

The only reason the bubble went on for so long is probably due to fraud, lack of regulation and the artificial prop by Greenspan and some of you are blaming Schiff for not getting the right time-frame?

Please, where’s the logical reasoning???

[Dukehorn]

A lot of posters here are fantastic. They can argue intelligently and process facts. Then there are folks like Casca who are troll-baiters. I think Shadowfax did more than an adequate job explaining the duties of the President of the Harvard Law Review or what Obama’s status was as a Con Law instructor at UoC, but of course, his argument wasn’t addressed.

Frankly, I’ll treat certain posters here with respect (Allan being one of them) even if I disagree with some aspects of their politics, but the courtesy shouldn’t (nor will) be extended to the OP nor Casca.

PS Back in my managing editor days at a law journal at Duke, I frankly didn’t have time to fine-tune my own note for publication. I was too busy making sure that my staff and the authors were on the same page and that the articles were adequately proofed before I had to deal with the publishing house. My grades dropped my 3rd year while dealing with all that crap. Obama managed to pull a magna cum laude at Harvard. If he’s dumber than a box of rocks, I’m afraid to know how we’d classify a number of the posters here.

[Dukehorn]

A lot of posters here are fantastic. They can argue intelligently and process facts. Then there are folks like Casca who are troll-baiters. I think Shadowfax did more than an adequate job explaining the duties of the President of the Harvard Law Review or what Obama’s status was as a Con Law instructor at UoC, but of course, his argument wasn’t addressed.

Frankly, I’ll treat certain posters here with respect (Allan being one of them) even if I disagree with some aspects of their politics, but the courtesy shouldn’t (nor will) be extended to the OP nor Casca.

PS Back in my managing editor days at a law journal at Duke, I frankly didn’t have time to fine-tune my own note for publication. I was too busy making sure that my staff and the authors were on the same page and that the articles were adequately proofed before I had to deal with the publishing house. My grades dropped my 3rd year while dealing with all that crap. Obama managed to pull a magna cum laude at Harvard. If he’s dumber than a box of rocks, I’m afraid to know how we’d classify a number of the posters here.

[Dukehorn]

A lot of posters here are fantastic. They can argue intelligently and process facts. Then there are folks like Casca who are troll-baiters. I think Shadowfax did more than an adequate job explaining the duties of the President of the Harvard Law Review or what Obama’s status was as a Con Law instructor at UoC, but of course, his argument wasn’t addressed.

Frankly, I’ll treat certain posters here with respect (Allan being one of them) even if I disagree with some aspects of their politics, but the courtesy shouldn’t (nor will) be extended to the OP nor Casca.

PS Back in my managing editor days at a law journal at Duke, I frankly didn’t have time to fine-tune my own note for publication. I was too busy making sure that my staff and the authors were on the same page and that the articles were adequately proofed before I had to deal with the publishing house. My grades dropped my 3rd year while dealing with all that crap. Obama managed to pull a magna cum laude at Harvard. If he’s dumber than a box of rocks, I’m afraid to know how we’d classify a number of the posters here.

[Dukehorn]

A lot of posters here are fantastic. They can argue intelligently and process facts. Then there are folks like Casca who are troll-baiters. I think Shadowfax did more than an adequate job explaining the duties of the President of the Harvard Law Review or what Obama’s status was as a Con Law instructor at UoC, but of course, his argument wasn’t addressed.

Frankly, I’ll treat certain posters here with respect (Allan being one of them) even if I disagree with some aspects of their politics, but the courtesy shouldn’t (nor will) be extended to the OP nor Casca.

PS Back in my managing editor days at a law journal at Duke, I frankly didn’t have time to fine-tune my own note for publication. I was too busy making sure that my staff and the authors were on the same page and that the articles were adequately proofed before I had to deal with the publishing house. My grades dropped my 3rd year while dealing with all that crap. Obama managed to pull a magna cum laude at Harvard. If he’s dumber than a box of rocks, I’m afraid to know how we’d classify a number of the posters here.

[Dukehorn]

A lot of posters here are fantastic. They can argue intelligently and process facts. Then there are folks like Casca who are troll-baiters. I think Shadowfax did more than an adequate job explaining the duties of the President of the Harvard Law Review or what Obama’s status was as a Con Law instructor at UoC, but of course, his argument wasn’t addressed.

Frankly, I’ll treat certain posters here with respect (Allan being one of them) even if I disagree with some aspects of their politics, but the courtesy shouldn’t (nor will) be extended to the OP nor Casca.

PS Back in my managing editor days at a law journal at Duke, I frankly didn’t have time to fine-tune my own note for publication. I was too busy making sure that my staff and the authors were on the same page and that the articles were adequately proofed before I had to deal with the publishing house. My grades dropped my 3rd year while dealing with all that crap. Obama managed to pull a magna cum laude at Harvard. If he’s dumber than a box of rocks, I’m afraid to know how we’d classify a number of the posters here.

[Dukehorn]

Why bother Allan?

Casca “attempts” to use big SAT words and seems to have some self-esteem issues in relation to some of the better schools here in the States.

Just another ignorant racist that tries to hide it with a subpar vocabulary.

PS Casca, feel free to call me an Oriental since that is how archaic your word choices tend to be.

[Dukehorn]

Why bother Allan?

Casca “attempts” to use big SAT words and seems to have some self-esteem issues in relation to some of the better schools here in the States.

Just another ignorant racist that tries to hide it with a subpar vocabulary.

PS Casca, feel free to call me an Oriental since that is how archaic your word choices tend to be.

[Dukehorn]

Why bother Allan?

Casca “attempts” to use big SAT words and seems to have some self-esteem issues in relation to some of the better schools here in the States.

Just another ignorant racist that tries to hide it with a subpar vocabulary.

PS Casca, feel free to call me an Oriental since that is how archaic your word choices tend to be.

[Dukehorn]

Why bother Allan?

Casca “attempts” to use big SAT words and seems to have some self-esteem issues in relation to some of the better schools here in the States.

Just another ignorant racist that tries to hide it with a subpar vocabulary.

PS Casca, feel free to call me an Oriental since that is how archaic your word choices tend to be.

[Author]

Posts