[Djshakes]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=Djshakes]I am unable to see youtube at work…but let me guess..this is about the founding forebearers (the liberals love quoting her as saying founding forefathers instead) and their quest to end slavery?[/quote]

Yeah, “forebearers” is not the same as “forefathers.” – and that’s really important!

The video is the the “extended” version. I actually found it painful to watch.

The part about the “eye” on the dollar bill was particularly bizarre.

So Michelle is your new gal, eh? I thought Sarah was prettier, but it’s not all about looks. Brains matter too. Christina was cute – whatever happened to her?[/quote]

I heard bits and pieces of it. Basically where Chris Matthews played snipets of her and made himself look extremely ignornant trying to flame her and proving he knows nothing about the 3/5 clause in the constitution. I didn’t care enough to watch the whole interview. I’m not a fan of politicians on either side of the isle.

Half of you are forgetting that the United States didn’t become the United States until 1776. Prior to that we were under Britain’s rule. The first English colony to import a slave was Virginia in 1619. The constitution eradicated slavery in 1865. So if you look at it from the fact that slaves were on this continent for 246 years or under United states rule for 89 years is a drop in the pot seeing as how slaves existed since the beginning of time! So if you want to ignore these facts and blatant works of our early politicians to end slavery with an amendment to the constitution which influenced other countries around the world to do the same because of semantics and a political slant because someone on the other side of the isle acknowledge it, you are an idiot. Why don’t you just spit on the flag if you want to ignore what this great country did to end slavery here and around the world. It wasn’t a coincidence slavery greatly decreased worldwide after the United States set a precedence. That is the point she was making. Yet we bog down progress with slapping matches about semantics and slight slip ups. This goes for both sides of the political spectrum. I would like to see anyone of you extremely articulate individuals be in the lime light day in day out and not slip up…especially when people are looking for it.

[Djshakes]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=Djshakes]I am unable to see youtube at work…but let me guess..this is about the founding forebearers (the liberals love quoting her as saying founding forefathers instead) and their quest to end slavery?[/quote]

Yeah, “forebearers” is not the same as “forefathers.” – and that’s really important!

The video is the the “extended” version. I actually found it painful to watch.

The part about the “eye” on the dollar bill was particularly bizarre.

So Michelle is your new gal, eh? I thought Sarah was prettier, but it’s not all about looks. Brains matter too. Christina was cute – whatever happened to her?[/quote]

I heard bits and pieces of it. Basically where Chris Matthews played snipets of her and made himself look extremely ignornant trying to flame her and proving he knows nothing about the 3/5 clause in the constitution. I didn’t care enough to watch the whole interview. I’m not a fan of politicians on either side of the isle.

Half of you are forgetting that the United States didn’t become the United States until 1776. Prior to that we were under Britain’s rule. The first English colony to import a slave was Virginia in 1619. The constitution eradicated slavery in 1865. So if you look at it from the fact that slaves were on this continent for 246 years or under United states rule for 89 years is a drop in the pot seeing as how slaves existed since the beginning of time! So if you want to ignore these facts and blatant works of our early politicians to end slavery with an amendment to the constitution which influenced other countries around the world to do the same because of semantics and a political slant because someone on the other side of the isle acknowledge it, you are an idiot. Why don’t you just spit on the flag if you want to ignore what this great country did to end slavery here and around the world. It wasn’t a coincidence slavery greatly decreased worldwide after the United States set a precedence. That is the point she was making. Yet we bog down progress with slapping matches about semantics and slight slip ups. This goes for both sides of the political spectrum. I would like to see anyone of you extremely articulate individuals be in the lime light day in day out and not slip up…especially when people are looking for it.

[Djshakes]

[quote=briansd1][quote=pri_dk]
Although 150 federal laws have been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and these rulings have spanned history such that they have occurred during almost every Presidential administration in the past 100 years, no one has ever called for the impeachment of a President for this reason.

Well, not until now.[/quote]

Obama’s Health Care law is basically a Republican plan.

http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/obamas-moderate-health-care-plan

Republicans who oppose health care reform really ought to self-examine to see why they are so viscerally opposed to anything Obama comes up with, even when he embraces Republican ideas.[/quote]

And what is the difference between republicans and democrats now days other than the title?

You consistently think conservatives are republicans.

[Djshakes]

[quote=briansd1][quote=pri_dk]
Although 150 federal laws have been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and these rulings have spanned history such that they have occurred during almost every Presidential administration in the past 100 years, no one has ever called for the impeachment of a President for this reason.

Well, not until now.[/quote]

Obama’s Health Care law is basically a Republican plan.

http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/obamas-moderate-health-care-plan

Republicans who oppose health care reform really ought to self-examine to see why they are so viscerally opposed to anything Obama comes up with, even when he embraces Republican ideas.[/quote]

And what is the difference between republicans and democrats now days other than the title?

You consistently think conservatives are republicans.

[Djshakes]

[quote=briansd1][quote=pri_dk]
Although 150 federal laws have been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and these rulings have spanned history such that they have occurred during almost every Presidential administration in the past 100 years, no one has ever called for the impeachment of a President for this reason.

Well, not until now.[/quote]

Obama’s Health Care law is basically a Republican plan.

http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/obamas-moderate-health-care-plan

Republicans who oppose health care reform really ought to self-examine to see why they are so viscerally opposed to anything Obama comes up with, even when he embraces Republican ideas.[/quote]

And what is the difference between republicans and democrats now days other than the title?

You consistently think conservatives are republicans.

[Djshakes]

[quote=briansd1][quote=pri_dk]
Although 150 federal laws have been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and these rulings have spanned history such that they have occurred during almost every Presidential administration in the past 100 years, no one has ever called for the impeachment of a President for this reason.

Well, not until now.[/quote]

Obama’s Health Care law is basically a Republican plan.

http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/obamas-moderate-health-care-plan

Republicans who oppose health care reform really ought to self-examine to see why they are so viscerally opposed to anything Obama comes up with, even when he embraces Republican ideas.[/quote]

And what is the difference between republicans and democrats now days other than the title?

You consistently think conservatives are republicans.

[Djshakes]

[quote=briansd1][quote=pri_dk]
Although 150 federal laws have been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and these rulings have spanned history such that they have occurred during almost every Presidential administration in the past 100 years, no one has ever called for the impeachment of a President for this reason.

Well, not until now.[/quote]

Obama’s Health Care law is basically a Republican plan.

http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/obamas-moderate-health-care-plan

Republicans who oppose health care reform really ought to self-examine to see why they are so viscerally opposed to anything Obama comes up with, even when he embraces Republican ideas.[/quote]

And what is the difference between republicans and democrats now days other than the title?

You consistently think conservatives are republicans.

[Djshakes]

I actually have it hanging up in my cube. LOL.

[Djshakes]

I actually have it hanging up in my cube. LOL.

[Djshakes]

I actually have it hanging up in my cube. LOL.

[Djshakes]

I actually have it hanging up in my cube. LOL.

[Djshakes]

I actually have it hanging up in my cube. LOL.

[Djshakes]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=Djshakes]I was dually certified to teach business and marketing. I taught at public school outside of Milwaukee. Courses I taught were: Accounting, Intermediate accounting, Advanced accounting, keyboarding, Computer applications 1&2, personal finance, Marketing…[/quote]

Djshakes, this is a great skillset. I don’t think “keyboarding” is taught anymore because now most 9-year-olds can do it with their thumbs, lol. And I WISH “personal finance” would be mandated as a HS graduation requirement in CA. I haven’t seen it offered. Your accounting classes are taught here at the community college level. Marketing USED to be taught in HS in the “olden days” under the acronym “DECA.” I have not seen it offered it my district.

Maybe you could get a part-time teaching gig in accounting in the eves at a cc if you find time 🙂 You won’t need a credential for this.[/quote]

Well, there is a reason WI schools are better than CA. All the money they dump into schools out here and the kids don’t even have elective choices.

[Djshakes]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=Djshakes]I was dually certified to teach business and marketing. I taught at public school outside of Milwaukee. Courses I taught were: Accounting, Intermediate accounting, Advanced accounting, keyboarding, Computer applications 1&2, personal finance, Marketing…[/quote]

Djshakes, this is a great skillset. I don’t think “keyboarding” is taught anymore because now most 9-year-olds can do it with their thumbs, lol. And I WISH “personal finance” would be mandated as a HS graduation requirement in CA. I haven’t seen it offered. Your accounting classes are taught here at the community college level. Marketing USED to be taught in HS in the “olden days” under the acronym “DECA.” I have not seen it offered it my district.

Maybe you could get a part-time teaching gig in accounting in the eves at a cc if you find time 🙂 You won’t need a credential for this.[/quote]

Well, there is a reason WI schools are better than CA. All the money they dump into schools out here and the kids don’t even have elective choices.

[Djshakes]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=Djshakes]I was dually certified to teach business and marketing. I taught at public school outside of Milwaukee. Courses I taught were: Accounting, Intermediate accounting, Advanced accounting, keyboarding, Computer applications 1&2, personal finance, Marketing…[/quote]

Djshakes, this is a great skillset. I don’t think “keyboarding” is taught anymore because now most 9-year-olds can do it with their thumbs, lol. And I WISH “personal finance” would be mandated as a HS graduation requirement in CA. I haven’t seen it offered. Your accounting classes are taught here at the community college level. Marketing USED to be taught in HS in the “olden days” under the acronym “DECA.” I have not seen it offered it my district.

Maybe you could get a part-time teaching gig in accounting in the eves at a cc if you find time 🙂 You won’t need a credential for this.[/quote]

Well, there is a reason WI schools are better than CA. All the money they dump into schools out here and the kids don’t even have elective choices.

[Author]

Posts