[dbapig]

I was wondering when this topic would be brought up again…

didn’t take long…

btw, can’t wait for The Pacific.

[dbapig]

I was wondering when this topic would be brought up again…

didn’t take long…

btw, can’t wait for The Pacific.

[dbapig]

I was wondering when this topic would be brought up again…

didn’t take long…

btw, can’t wait for The Pacific.

[dbapig]

I was wondering when this topic would be brought up again…

didn’t take long…

btw, can’t wait for The Pacific.

[dbapig]

I was wondering when this topic would be brought up again…

didn’t take long…

btw, can’t wait for The Pacific.

[dbapig]

[quote=meadandale]Funny, the first amendment says nothing about the first amendment right to free speech applying to ‘humans’ as opposed to corporations.
[/quote]

By that very same reasoning, since the Constitution didn’t specify equal right is only for straights, gays/lesbians are equal to those straight and should be able to get married.

The judges just gave a ton of ammo to gay rights people.

[dbapig]

[quote=meadandale]Funny, the first amendment says nothing about the first amendment right to free speech applying to ‘humans’ as opposed to corporations.
[/quote]

By that very same reasoning, since the Constitution didn’t specify equal right is only for straights, gays/lesbians are equal to those straight and should be able to get married.

The judges just gave a ton of ammo to gay rights people.

[dbapig]

[quote=meadandale]Funny, the first amendment says nothing about the first amendment right to free speech applying to ‘humans’ as opposed to corporations.
[/quote]

By that very same reasoning, since the Constitution didn’t specify equal right is only for straights, gays/lesbians are equal to those straight and should be able to get married.

The judges just gave a ton of ammo to gay rights people.

[dbapig]

[quote=meadandale]Funny, the first amendment says nothing about the first amendment right to free speech applying to ‘humans’ as opposed to corporations.
[/quote]

By that very same reasoning, since the Constitution didn’t specify equal right is only for straights, gays/lesbians are equal to those straight and should be able to get married.

The judges just gave a ton of ammo to gay rights people.

[dbapig]

[quote=meadandale]Funny, the first amendment says nothing about the first amendment right to free speech applying to ‘humans’ as opposed to corporations.
[/quote]

By that very same reasoning, since the Constitution didn’t specify equal right is only for straights, gays/lesbians are equal to those straight and should be able to get married.

The judges just gave a ton of ammo to gay rights people.

[dbapig]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.[/quote]

I should add less conservatives are more sensitive (hence passionate) about account of sex.

I hope we pass the amendment to ban corporations funding without limit. We should slap the 5 Supreme Court justices with the amendment, like they should be.

[dbapig]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.[/quote]

I should add less conservatives are more sensitive (hence passionate) about account of sex.

I hope we pass the amendment to ban corporations funding without limit. We should slap the 5 Supreme Court justices with the amendment, like they should be.

[dbapig]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.[/quote]

I should add less conservatives are more sensitive (hence passionate) about account of sex.

I hope we pass the amendment to ban corporations funding without limit. We should slap the 5 Supreme Court justices with the amendment, like they should be.

[dbapig]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.[/quote]

I should add less conservatives are more sensitive (hence passionate) about account of sex.

I hope we pass the amendment to ban corporations funding without limit. We should slap the 5 Supreme Court justices with the amendment, like they should be.

[dbapig]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]This is a good example of something that could be handled by an amendment to the constitution.

Unfortunately, you would see opponents to this using their power gained by this ruling to campaign heavily against it.

Remember, we still have not even passed the equal rights amendment. Which seems simple by comparison.
Here are the exact words:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Now if we couldn’t get 38 states to pass this, what are the chances on a campaign finance amendment?

** Note: This message funded in part by earnings from evil corporations. opinions are those of FSD and may be reproduced without consent from anyone.[/quote]

I should add less conservatives are more sensitive (hence passionate) about account of sex.

I hope we pass the amendment to ban corporations funding without limit. We should slap the 5 Supreme Court justices with the amendment, like they should be.

[Author]

Posts