Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
CoronitaParticipant[quote=teaboy]Thanks for the tips!
I already cut out the old back window 10 years ago and have been mostly OK since it’s mostly garaged. Rest of roof is in OK condition.
I read that installing a full new roof onto an existing frame is a 6-8 hour job, which means a couple months for me 😉
Also, I see the back window only sections for sale. But not sure how easy these pop in.
http://m.ebay.com/itm/EZ-ON-MAZDA-MIATA-1990-2005-Convertible-Soft-Top-Plastic-Window-Black-Cabrio-/251217761656?_trkparms=aid%253D222007%2526algo%253DSIC.MBE%2526ao%253D1%2526asc%253D20150519202348%2526meid%253D8a7b63503c904a88b732cc584e508741%2526pid%253D100408%2526rk%253D4%2526rkt%253D16%2526mehot%253Dpp%2526sd%253D251354727931&_trksid=p2056116.c100408.m2460Anyone know about these? I’ll try to look into these further and report back.
tb[/quote]
Ugh..just buying the rear part.might be a challenge. The zipper tooth count might be different, depending on whether your top is oem or whether what they are selling is oem. If you can remove the rear part yourself, you can find an interior shop that will sew on a new rear window. It shouldn’t cost more than $300 at most. I don’t think rocky would do this sort of work because he isn’t an interior guy
He would most likely buy an entire top and install it…but call him and maybe he does do this sort of repair or at least knows some guy that will. I haven’t found a reasonable interior shop myself for any of my cars. So if you find one, let me know.
CoronitaParticipant[quote=Rich Toscano]This is where I take my car:
A bit of a haul from Poway, but they know their Miatas as far as I can tell…[/quote]
. +1 on Rocky’s. He’s right next to Brian Goodwin. Actually if you buy your own top and bring it with your miata to the next tech day, you might find people to help you install it. Rocky is pretty good at loaning the lifts during tech days.
CoronitaParticipantI pm’d you. Check you messages.
CoronitaParticipantI’d offer to give you mine if it were in better condition, but it isn’t. What part do you need replaced? Do you need to replace entire top or just the fogged/cracked plastic window in back?
When I first got the car, the top was fine, but the back window was fogged and cracked. So I replaced the back plastic window myself for like $18 using plastic vinyl from Yardage Town and some VLP glue from ace hardware.
If you need to replace the entire top, a good top will probably run you about $200 for the top itself, and about $100 for the rain gutter and about $300-400 for labor. You can do it yourself, I don’t think it’s that difficult. The other thing you can consider is look in craiglist, because there plenty of people that convert their NA to a full fledge track car, and they usually ditch the entire softtop, so you might be able to pick up one that is good condition for like $100-150 on an existing frame/rail….Installing that would be a lot easier than trying to install a soft top on a frame itself.
I’m still looking for a hardtop so I can ditch my softtop. But I’m having a hard time spending another $1000 for a hardtop on a car that itself was $2000…
If you just need to replace the back window, here’s the $18 FLU “ghetto” way of doing it.
You’ll need:
1. Clear vinyl from Yardage Town in Clairmont (the one in Mira Mesa closed 🙁 )
2. Electric tape
3. Clear packaging tape
4. A cutting board (preferably something you won’t use for cooking again)
5. VLP glue from Ace Hardware…
Here’s a rough idea of what you need to do if you’re only interested in changing the rear plastic window…
0. Take the back part of the soft top off. There’s plenty of web instructions on how to do this…
1. Scrub the old window well.
2. Use a razor blade and carefully cut the old window out. Use a cutting board on the backside to make a clean cut..
3. Use your cut out window as a template for the new window, leaving about a 1/2 inch border around the new window. Use a pair of shears or razor to cut the new vinyl
4. Place new window on back cover of top. use electric tape on the backside of the window to create a seal between the top and the new vinyl. This does two things. a) it keeps the vinyl in place while you glue. b) it prevents glue from leaking to the other side of your top.
5.Get a piece of electric tape and tape your outer top, tracing the edge of the vinyl. The idea is you want to create a mask around the top, so any glue that seeps out doesn’t make a mess onto the rest of your top..6. Get a piece of clear packaging tape ready. You will use this tape on top of where you are gluing, sealing the vinvl with glue to the top.
7. Apply a very tiny thin amount of glue to one side of the plastic vinyl, about 1/2 inch wide…Make sure it’s thin, but well coated..
8. Place your clear packaging tape on top of the vinyl and press down and smooth the plastic vinyl to the top…use the packaging tape to create a nice/smooth seal between the vinyl and the rest of your top…
9. Use something heavy like a dictionary, some weights and put those heavy things on the vinyl so when glue dries, it creates a nice tight bond with the soft top. Make sure you spread the weight evenly across the side you are gluing..
Glue only one side at a time, and make sure one side dries before gluing the next adjacent side. This will eliminate any sort of bubbling/wrinkle in the vinyl in case the vinyl expands/contracts wile gluing (ask me how I know)..
Repeat for the remaining 3 sides after each side has dried…
It took me maybe one night to do this.
IF you remove the back and ask someone to do it, it will probably cost about $100-200..Money well spent, unless you actually enjoy doing this like I do.
CoronitaParticipantPhew…. I guess old school math did it’s job….[img_assist|nid=25497 | width=700 | height=600]
I was actually expecting since my kid is utterly careless in her work that she would have done worse on these standardized tests……Or maybe I should be a tiger parent and ask my kid why didn’t she reach the 99th percentile……Fail….
Anyway, I guess these tests aren’t as bad as people make them out to be. Math is math, and probably won’t change that much.
CoronitaParticipant[quote=joec]
I honestly think the “good” homeschooled kids are probably the best off now (assuming the parents or people doing it) know what they are doing.[/quote]I wouldn’t trust myself to completely homeschool. Plus I do like my kid being out there with a lot of other kids so they know what it’s like out with different people. That said, different people do different things and if it works homeschool, not home school its all good.
I do prefer to spend time with my kid to go over extra math and reading and writing, since I believe the problem is kids aren’t practicing enough to understand and remember the concepts. But that is just me.
September 12, 2015 at 3:26 PM in reply to: OT F-35 Program.. $1.5 Trillion. Lockheed Martin benefits ? #789333
CoronitaParticipantYeah, but the F35 is sooooo cool…
CoronitaParticipantI think the only movie I saw with the past year was the minions movie at the cinopolis in carmelv.. Yeah, I had to bring my kid along so people.didn’t think I was creepy by going alone.
CoronitaParticipant[quote=AN][quote=all][quote=flu]Out of curiosity…I am sort of curious what percentage of the people that like ccm are STEM degreed/career oriented people.[/quote]
I like the fact that common core is not 100% focused on making sure that 12 year old child can multiply one digit numbers. Imagine where your kid would be if all she had to do is meet pre-ccm standard of good enough?[/quote]WTF? 12 years old multiplying one digit? My 6 year old kid started learning simple 1s, 10s, 100s multiplication and division at the end of his 1st grade school year. You must be joking, right?[/quote]
No. Multiplication of 2 digits is implied by end of third grade. At least it was in our district. Or maybe I just wasn’t paying attention what was actually taught in school since I sort have have our own enrichment at home and at Chinese school (which in itself has issues..)
In public schools, if you are lucky the teacher will try to break the students up into different levels depending on ability. If you are unlucky, the teach won’t and the same material will be taught and your kid might end up being bored.
CoronitaParticipantI am going to hold out for a few more years. Hopefully panels will get smaller more efficient and become more like a commodity item…
CoronitaParticipant[quote=all][quote=flu]Out of curiosity…I am sort of curious what percentage of the people that like ccm are STEM degreed/career oriented people.[/quote]
I like the fact that common core is not 100% focused on making sure that 12 year old child can multiply one digit numbers. Imagine where your kid would be if all she had to do is meet pre-ccm standard of good enough?[/quote]
I don’t think there are any amount of standards that are going to help if the kid has no interest in math and/or has no discipline to practice math even if he/she doesn’t want to. I don’t think ccm is really going to make a difference to the kids that are already mathematically inclined or for the kids that have parents that care enough about their math skills, since “old” math seemed to have worked just fine for kids in those categories. And I don’t know what it will do for the other kids that have no interest in math and/or are not mathematically inclined.
CoronitaParticipant[quote=all]Flu, common core requirements make more sense as you move to slightly more complex material.
Sixth grade handbook has a problem similar to this
Person A is asked to find the least common multiple for the following pairs: (17, 41), (31, 11), (29, 37). Person A concludes that LCM(a1, a2) can be calculated as a1 x a2, for a1, a2 > 0.
Person B is given the following pairs: (8, 32), (12, 36), (9, 45). Person B concludes LCM(a1, a2) = MAX(a1, a2).
Person C is given (14, 18), (42, 10), (22, 4) and person C comes up with LCM(a1, a2) = a1 x a2 / 2.Are A, B, or C conclusions accurate? If not, what additional requirement(s) must a1 and a2 meet to make each formula accurate?
I thought it was good problem and it is very different from what no child left behind requirements were.[/quote]
I am not against all of ccm…. But questions like this seem to beat around the bush of whether a kid really knows what a least common multiple is and overcomplicates explaining what an lcm is and how one goes about finding it.
The purpose of this question is suppose to challenge whether a kid knows lcm or not. But along with it, it introduces a lot of other things that while may be fine for some of us more mathematically inclined, will utterly confuse the heck out of those that aren’t. For example, your average nonmath oriented kid is not going to feel that comfortable with fsomething like a function and variables. And now this questions overcomplicates the lcm lesson by introducing max(a1,a2), etc….and there’s a more practical consideration… When is such a “puzzle” type lcm question ever used in the real world, even in engineering and science… (It isn’t)…third.. This type of question will also make math incredibly more difficult to understand for those social-economically disadvantaged esl students by now introducing a heck of lot of English leaning language into a fundamentally easy math concept that should have been language agnostic. So… Again…I am not sure I understand the point of this type of question, except to see how well kids are at solving clever puzzle questions that have very little bearing on the real practical math use cases in the real world.
Anyway..my 4th grader figured this out, simple because her Chinese ol school math lessons taught lcm the old fashion way back when she was in 3rd grade and because she understands lcm now..simply because of practice practice practice.
CoronitaParticipantOut of curiosity…I am sort of curious what percentage of the people that like ccm are STEM degreed/career oriented people.
CoronitaParticipantCool. Should be free too.
-
AuthorPosts
